<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: High consumption taxes? Not in Australia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/02/19/high-consumption-taxes-not-in-australia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/02/19/high-consumption-taxes-not-in-australia/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 11:49:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: drsmithy</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/02/19/high-consumption-taxes-not-in-australia/comment-page-1/#comment-238314</link>
		<dc:creator>drsmithy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=349718#comment-238314</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;There’s presumably a good explanation from Apple for that.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m sure it&#039;s the same explanation BMW, Audi and Mercedes have for putting a 40%+ premium on their cars here - because they can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>There’s presumably a good explanation from Apple for that.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s the same explanation BMW, Audi and Mercedes have for putting a 40%+ premium on their cars here - because they can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 489/498 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2013-05-21 21:56:14 -->