tip off

Inside the Vatican, West Wing meets The Da Vinci code

Pope Benedict’s resignation is about much more than declining health. This is a Machiavellian power struggle more riveting than any soap opera, writes Vatican watcher Michael Hewitt-Gleeson.

The commentary on the Pope’s resignation seems to be largely ill-informed, naive or perhaps both. One newspaper’s online cover story even featured a 12-second video of lightning striking St Peter’s in Rome shortly after the Pope’s announcement. The point being …?

As more than 1000 years of well-documented history shows, in the salons of the Vatican, it is always about their infamous libido dominandi, their insatiable lust for power. Think The West Wing meets The Da Vinci Code meets The Borgias. Where power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. There is secrecy and blackmail, power and survival, s-x and r-pe, bribery and murder — contrasted with brilliance, virtuosity, bravery, humanity and love. What a story!

This is high human Machiavellian drama played out by sophisticated princes (there are no princesses), pampered and refined in sumptuous Baroque gem-encrusted costumery, gold-plated chalices, priceless art collections and all the trappings of fabulous wealth. Canberra politics seems to lack a certain lustre by comparison.

In modern history, since Mussolini gave Pope Pius XII the Vatican (some buildings and gardens and even a stunning marble-encrusted private railway station), it has operated as a sovereign state with its own elected sovereign, its government, its laws, its famous Swiss army, its infamous bank and its international diplomatic corps with which Australia swaps residential diplomats.

The key insight, that few commentators seem to understand, is that there are two separate and historically rival entities in the Vatican: The Holy See and The Roman Curia. The Holy See is the office of the Pope. The Roman Curia is the government ministries and the bureaucracy which also controls the cash. Think of the deep rivalry between the White House and Capitol Hill in The West Wing and you begin to get the idea.

If you connect the recent dots, there’s a power struggle going on (as usual) between the Roman Curia and the Holy See. The Curia is led by Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone who is backed by the Salesians (the fastest growing order in the church and on an ascending path for consolidating its power). Bertone is Secretary of State and also the Camerlengo which means he controls the Curia and will run the church when the Pope becomes too old or too ill to do his job. He would then, in effect, be the de facto pope. Papal doctors could keep an ailing pope alive for ten years which means that Bertone could run the church for a decade before the pope finally dies and there is an election. This is a very tempting and powerful proposition to an ambitious Roman prince. Bertone is the Pope’s nemesis in the Vatican.

Pope Benedict (who as Cardinal Ratzinger himself ran the church when pope John Paul II was too old) knows exactly what this means and has been trying to thwart Bertone’s stalking grab for power. The recent Vatileaks episode was evidence of all this. It was all about the Pope’s loyal butler trying to stave off Bertone and trying to protect his master, but Bertone got him anyway.

So we are left with an aging Pope, a virtual prisoner of The Holy See, running out of personal protectors, who has only one move left to keep The Holy See from the hands of Bertone and the Roman Curia. He can put the future of the church back into the hands of the College of Cardinals … by resigning! Checkmate.

A clever, courageous, strategic and game-changing move from an old and embattled man to protect his Chair of Peter from those who would covet its power.”

Benedict has warned his Vatican nemesis of this for at least a couple of years. Rome’s diplomatic corps was abuzz with this in 2010. Former Australian ambassador to The Holy See, Tim Fischer, has referred to the fact of rumours of resignation in his own recent commentaries.

Maybe Bertone and co thought the Pontiff was bluffing. Anyway, he’s made his move. A clever, courageous, strategic and game-changing move from an old and embattled man to protect his Chair of Peter from those who would covet its power.

Everything now depends on the new pope. Bertone won’t get it but will be trying to get “his man” elected. We can assume that Ratzinger will be trying to get one of his men to succeed him. That’s where George Pell of Australia might have a chance as he is one of the Pope’s loyal men. But there are other powerful factions who now have a chance, too. Brazil is one of the biggest Catholic countries, a rich and powerful country with a growing economy and the site of the next Olympic Games. Africa or Asia are also growth areas for the church. The Italians haven’t had a pope for a while and Berlusconi can not only buy an election but he can probably buy a papacy. It wouldn’t be the first time The Holy See has been bought by a political leader.

Or, even an outlier. A “good” pope; in the tradition of a John XXIII. Imagine if the cardinals elected a pope with an impeccable scandal-free record in the handling of child r-pe. One who had the gravitas and the vision to heal the church of its current crimes. This could capture the imagination, not only of the “people of God”, but also of the entire world which has watched this sordid episode in long-suffering dismay.

In this new game-change there will be lots of potential opportunities and unexpected consequences. For example, after the election there will be a big new problem: two popes.

This means the church is vulnerable to a split. For example, if ultra-conservatives don’t like the new man (especially a “good pope”) they can refuse to recognise him and say they still believe Benedict is the real pope. And vice versa. This has happened many times before in history.

Forget The Bold and the Beautiful and stay tuned. It’s a fascinating and unfolding story urbi et orbi with something for everyone.

*Michael Hewitt-Gleeson is the founder and principal of the School of Thinking and has studied theology and Vatican affairs for 30 years

17
  • 1
    GF50
    Posted Thursday, 14 February 2013 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    Thankyou, so the plot thickens! like any form of politics money corrupts, ethics/morality/humanity, an easy conclusion when I have no belief in the Christian myth so no need to function with cognitive dissonance.

  • 2
    Posted Thursday, 14 February 2013 at 1:46 pm | Permalink

    I add my thanx for this piece which I likewise found most informative.

  • 3
    Steve777
    Posted Thursday, 14 February 2013 at 2:55 pm | Permalink

    Thank you for a very interesting and informative post. I hope a ‘Good Pope’ gets up.

  • 4
    Harry1951
    Posted Thursday, 14 February 2013 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    Enlightening! I am an ex-Catholic and now an agnostic, but I would be appalled if Pell became Pope.That said there are probably others who might be worse.
    Hoping the church and religion generally sinks into irrelevance.

  • 5
    gapot
    Posted Thursday, 14 February 2013 at 3:27 pm | Permalink

    If the government in Italy can tax the church with its vast wealth why is our government unable to even talk about it. We not only give the church tax free status our government pays for their services in education and health care at full price.

  • 6
    puddleduck
    Posted Thursday, 14 February 2013 at 4:01 pm | Permalink

    Fascinating. Thank you for this brilliant, informative piece. Best thing I’ve read in crikey apart from Guy R for a while now.

    I’d LOVE to see a Good Pope elected. Not sure the Cardinals are up to the task.

  • 7
    mikeb
    Posted Thursday, 14 February 2013 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

    Wow that was a good read. Why isn’t this discussed elsewhere or have I just missed it? Dan Brown couldn’t think up a better story (but he’s probably working on it as we type).
    Hope the next Pope is a strong leader.

  • 8
    Posted Thursday, 14 February 2013 at 4:30 pm | Permalink

    MICHAEL H-G: Congratulations for being the scribe who has written the best comment on Benedict’s retirement that I’ve read. I’ve a couple of questions for you.

    ”” He can put the future of the church back into the hands of the College of Cardinals … by resigning! Checkmate.”“

    Has the Church got a future in it’s present form?

    Have any of the papal candidates got the pizzazz and the vision to take the Vatican into a two thousand year quantum leap into the present?

    ”That’s where George Pell of Australia might have a chance as he is one of the Pope’s loyal men.”“

    By failing to keep the lid on the sodomising priests paedophilia scandal, surely George Pell’s name will not be snow-white? As it were.

  • 9
    Andybob
    Posted Thursday, 14 February 2013 at 4:30 pm | Permalink

    Excellent piece. One way we might tell that we have a good Pope is if Benedict came out of seclusion to lead a movement against him.

  • 10
    AR
    Posted Thursday, 14 February 2013 at 4:57 pm | Permalink

    It may be interesting to see a decent person as Pope but how could that happen given that the catchment is composed of creatures who’ve smarmed, slimed and slithered their way into position?
    Good riddance to Ratzinger, the 8th level of hell awaits you & your ilk.

  • 11
    Hamis Hill
    Posted Thursday, 14 February 2013 at 5:09 pm | Permalink

    What a great workout for the grey matter.
    No dumbing down here!
    Bravo!
    More, more!

  • 12
    PaulM
    Posted Thursday, 14 February 2013 at 8:08 pm | Permalink

    ..and I suppose you think Barack Obama wasn’t born in Hawaii!!

    Utterly fanciful.

  • 13
    John64
    Posted Thursday, 14 February 2013 at 9:41 pm | Permalink

    It’s the pointy hat what does it. Them all wants to wears the pointy hat.

  • 14
    robo
    Posted Friday, 15 February 2013 at 10:27 am | Permalink

    As a cynical agnostic I thought it didn’t matter a damn who called himself infallible – I was much more concerned with the proliferation of militant Muslims.

    Still concerned with the MMs but having read this insightful article, it’s clear that the identity of anyone who influences the superstitions of so many people does matter.

    Can’t expect the most good, but I can hope for the least bad.

  • 15
    sebster
    Posted Friday, 15 February 2013 at 4:55 pm | Permalink

    Oh good grief. Care factor - zilch. The church is in any event on a downward spiral into irrelevancy. The piece was, however, very well-written…

  • 16
    Hermo
    Posted Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 2:40 pm | Permalink

    This is real journalism. Well done Crikey for publishing articles worth reading instead of the usual clichéd and predictable dross found out in the traditional media. Thank you for not treating your audience as if we are stupid.

  • 17
    Mike Flanagan
    Posted Monday, 18 February 2013 at 10:39 am | Permalink

    Although the above article is to be commended one has to wonder how much impact the moving on of Bennie boy is driven by his acceptance of the science of Climate Change.
    He has been a lone voice in the chuches’ leadership that has adressed mans’ impact on the climate.
    I suggest there are a considerable number of deniers of the empirical physics, as exemmplified by Pells understanding of science through the justinian philosophy of law, who might welcome Bennie’s passing of the baton.

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...