<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coalition not a good economic manager</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/02/06/coalition-not-a-good-economic-manager/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/02/06/coalition-not-a-good-economic-manager/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 02:46:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: klewso</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/02/06/coalition-not-a-good-economic-manager/comment-page-1/#comment-236737</link>
		<dc:creator>klewso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=346914#comment-236737</guid>
		<description>Murdoch has also started &quot;that ball rolling&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murdoch has also started &#8220;that ball rolling&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klewso</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2013/02/06/coalition-not-a-good-economic-manager/comment-page-1/#comment-236736</link>
		<dc:creator>klewso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=346914#comment-236736</guid>
		<description>&quot;Howard&quot; might have been pretty weak and overhyped when you look closely at their &quot;achievements&quot;, but they had Murdoch handling their PR, writing popular history. 
That dominant media institution, with their market share of edited views, weren&#039;t going to do that sort of scrutiny to &quot;Murdoch&#039;s Limited News Party of choice&quot;, because in doing so would draw negative publicity to and spoil their electoral chances - at least not &#039;til it came down to &quot;Howard v Rudd&quot; and their own credibility, when not even they could save Howard&#039;s bacon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="dquo">&#8220;</span>Howard&#8221; might have been pretty weak and overhyped when you look closely at their &#8220;achievements&#8221;, but they had Murdoch handling their PR, writing popular history.<br />
That dominant media institution, with their market share of edited views, weren&#8217;t going to do that sort of scrutiny to &#8220;Murdoch&#8217;s Limited News Party of choice&#8221;, because in doing so would draw negative publicity to and spoil their electoral chances - at least not &#8216;til it came down to &#8220;Howard v Rudd&#8221; and their own credibility, when not even they could save Howard&#8217;s bacon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 526/535 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2013-05-26 13:37:55 -->