tip off

Closing the gap? PM left ‘disappointed’ on Aboriginal welfare

Julia Gillard presented the latest report card on indigenous disadvantage today, revealing school kids are struggling, while Aboriginal employment drops. Amber Jamieson and Callum Denness report.

Prime Minister Julia Gillard has formally expressed “personal disappointment” that part of Labor’s quest to close the gap on indigenous disadvantage appears to be failing.

Gillard delivered her annual “closing the gap” update to Parliament this morning, revealing a mixed bag of results which include a widening gap between the reading and maths skills of indigenous and non-indigenous school kids.

Five of the key eight indicators for reading and numeracy “will need considerable” work, said Gillard, as she presented the Closing the Gap Prime Minister’s Report 2013. Of particular concern are reading levels of year 3 indigenous students, which have actually decreased in 2012 after improving between 2008-2011.

It’s the government’s own hyped National Assessment Program Literacy and Numeracy results that reveal these troubling figures. After five years of NAPLAN testing, only four of the eight literacy and numeracy indicators (writing can’t be compared as the test has recently changed and data is unavailable) have shown an improvement.

Only one of these — year 3 reading — has proven statistically significant, yet ironically year 3 reading levels dropped 2% in 2012. Year 9 reading levels in 2012 again dropped below the 2008 benchmark (as they also did in 2009 and 2010).

Meanwhile, of the four indicators that have decreased, two of them — year 3 and year 7 numeracy — are statistically significant. The poorest NAPLAN results show that only 48.8% of year 9 indigenous students meet national minimum standards.

I cannot conceal that these literacy and numeracy results are a source of personal disappointment. Last year’s optimism gives way this year to a starker realism,” said Gillard.

But the government can claim one win: it is on track to achieve its target that 95% of all indigenous four-year-olds in remote communities have access to early childhood education by 2013. It will be the first closing the gap target to be reached.

But it’s a complicated win: last year there was no data available to establish exactly how that target was going. This year data from the National Early Childhood Education and Care Collection shows that in August 2011, 91% of indigenous four-year-olds were enrolled in preschool programs. Latest data shows the government is on track to meet its 95% aim this year.

As the report notes, enrolment is not the same as attendance. One of the 2013 priorities for the Northern Territory’s Stronger Futures program is attendance.

Here’s how the six Closing the Gap targets — agreed to by federal, state and territory leaders in 2008 — are progressing …

Target: closing the life expectancy gap within a generation

Currently estimated at 11.5 years for indigenous males and 9.7 years for females, closing the life expectancy gap between indigenous and non indigenous Australians remains one of the hardest goals to achieve and report — they’re only updated every five years. Mortality rates, tracked on an annual basis, show a decline of 12% between 1998-2011, and 5% between 2006-2011 although non-indigenous mortality rates have also declined over the same period, meaning little progress on closing the gap. The report says this target won’t be met until 2031.

Target: halve the gap in mortality rates for indigenous children under five by 2018

During the period 1998-2011, mortality rates declined at a rate of 29%, outpacing the decline in non-indigenous mortality rates. This decline is “in the range” to meet the 2018 target, and Gillard said today the target is “within sight”.

Target: ensure access to early childhood education for all indigenous four-year-olds in remote communities by 2018

The report says this target will be met by 2013. The benchmark for the target is 95% enrolment for indigenous children in remote communities. The report from last year claimed data was not available to assess the progress of this target but new data shows the government is on track to achieve it.

Target: halve the gap in reading, writing and numeracy achievements for indigenous children by 2018

Using NAPLAN testing data, the report shows that progress on this target has been mixed. Only three out of eight literacy and numeracy outcomes for indigenous  students are on trajectory to meet the target. The data also shows that indigenous students in metropolitan areas achieve higher literacy and numeracy outcomes than their rural counterparts: only 20.3% of students in very remote areas achieved at or above national minimum standards compared to 76% in metro areas.

Target: halve the gap for indigenous students in year 12 (or equivalent) attainment rates by 2020

Progress on this target is ahead of schedule, according to today’s report. The year 12 or equivalent attainment gap between indigenous and non-indigenous Australians closed by 4.3% points, as attainment rates among indigenous students grew at a faster rate than non-indigenous students. To meet this target however, “continued rapid improvements will be needed” from 2011-16, says the report.

Target: halve the gap in employment outcomes between indigenous and other Australians by 2018

The 2011 census statistics showed that the gap in total employment outcomes widened since the 2006 census by 2.2 percentage points, characterised by a decrease in the proportion of indigenous Australians aged 16-64 in employment against a slight rise by non-indigenous Australians. The total employment rates for indigenous Australians decreased from 48% in 2006 to 46.2 % in 2011 compared to a 0.5% rise in the non-indigenous employment rate.

8
  • 1
    Jon Hunt
    Posted Wednesday, 6 February 2013 at 1:21 pm | Permalink

    Once again evidence that the Government does not know how to ‘close the gap’. How long will it take before someone, hopefully in government, realises that these problems are as a consequence of the treatment of Aboriginal people since ‘invasion’. More of the same will only perpetuate these problems. Ignoring advice such as this as they have done will not help.

  • 2
    Christopher Nagle
    Posted Wednesday, 6 February 2013 at 2:37 pm | Permalink

    Now that we have said our sorries to indigenous society, perhaps they could start saying a few sorries of their own, particularly to their children for letting them down by not giving them firm parameters, high expectations and a low tolerance for failure. Other ethnic groups in multicultural Australia with histories every bit as tragic as anything that has ever happened to indigenous Australia manage to take advantage of the opportunities our education system offers. Maybe some of our indigenous brothers and sisters need to see the opportunities ahead of their sorrows and take advantage of what is their to be had, like their migrant and refugee counterparts. Maybe it is time they took some responsibility for dispelling so called racist stereotypes with some creditable performance that enabled them to take their proper place in Australian society.

    I’m not just ‘disappointed’ with these education statistics. I’m pissed off, as much with humanist do gooders as much as indigenous communities. The message of all rights and no responsibility or accountability is one that has hit indigenous society much harder than the rest of us, for they had few defences against life without borders or moral compass than the rest of us, although we too have suffered.

    The awful picture of parts of indigenous society painted by the ‘Little Children Are Sacred Report’ is us in twenty years if we do not do something to bring back disciplined and morally compassed parenting and mentoring to our young. The lousy educational results are completely consistent with the kind of existential and social sub chaos that the report unveiled.

    If the stolen generation report, ‘Bringiing Them Home’ ten years earlier helped focus the collective mind on a pretty grim settler/indigenous history, then the question now needs to be asked, what did we bring them home to? I’ve seen humpytown encampments outside Roebourne that I wouldn’t leave a dog in let alone a human child. And I refuse to accept that those settlements are just a function of disadvantage and dispossession. That is just a miserable lousy excuse for tolerating failure, incompetence and lack of any sort of personal responsibility in a society that just isn’t that hard to get on in, whatever your race, ethnicity or religion.

  • 3
    shepherdmarilyn
    Posted Wednesday, 6 February 2013 at 3:04 pm | Permalink

    Agreed Jon, we continue to treat aboriginal people like the flora and fauna as they did before 1967.

    They are not provided with the same services as everyone else is entitled to because we want their land for mining.

  • 4
    Myka Phillips
    Posted Wednesday, 6 February 2013 at 7:25 pm | Permalink

    It’s a bit rich for some people to assume that Indigenous people are taking no responsibility for their lives, Christopher. Disadvantage, in any community, Indigenous or not is incredibly hard to reverse and especially cannot be changed with the click of the finger. The lack of opportunity provided to Indigenous people, especially in remote settings is disheartening, it’s not as easy for the children to gain an education when the local school is located a long distance away or get a job when you are racially stereotyped as ‘irresponsible’, the same goes with health.

    It’s so easy for people, like yourself and the government to pass off responsibility to Indigenous people. The government only seem to care about them when the election is around the corner or when the media actually find a story about Indigenous disadvantage newsworthy (.. which is hardly ever). It’s also easy for the Government to try and push this ‘responsibility’ to Indigenous communities when they enforce various policies, such as welfare quarantining, taking all their basic rights away and their ability to take responsibility..

    How are Indigenous people supposed to take control over their lives when the government love so much to take control of it? Maybe all the attempted and failed government strategies and policies have something to do with the ability for people to take responsibility?

  • 5
    SBH
    Posted Wednesday, 6 February 2013 at 10:13 pm | Permalink

    bring back disciplined and morally compassed parenting” really says it all Chris

    I’ll spare you the dirty little ideological cliche but when you attribute behaviours to a group of people because of their race - there’s really only one word for it

  • 6
    David Hand
    Posted Wednesday, 6 February 2013 at 11:35 pm | Permalink

    Myka,
    Indigenous people could take control of their lives by making sure their children go to school.

  • 7
    yeah, eh
    Posted Thursday, 7 February 2013 at 7:35 am | Permalink

    Christopher Nagle and David Hand - Doh! If only they’d thought of that earlier.

  • 8
    Jon Hunt
    Posted Thursday, 7 February 2013 at 3:49 pm | Permalink

    I think its a bit much to blame them for their problems (as often seems to occur) when their problems did not exist a few hundred years ago. So whose fault is it then?

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...