tip off

Facebookie: social betting next big thing in gambling

You can’t bet real money online, but you can play simulated casino games on your smartphone for “fun”. If the law changes, researchers are concerned it may have impacts on how we gamble online.

Smartphones: they can do just about anything. But it’s their potential to act as casinos, bookmakers and even the humble bingo caller that’s got gambling researchers betting on trouble.

For the moment it’s pretty hard to gamble real money online — bookies, of course, are legal, but current legislation forbids online casinos from operating in Australia. That means games like blackjack, roulette and poker are technically not available to local internet players — although savvy operators can find their way to an overseas casino.

The ban also extends to mobile smartphones. But that hasn’t halted the surge in gambling-themed games being offered in the iTunes and Android application stores. Slotomania, Bingo Bash and Poker by Zynga are just some of the gambling games to rise to the top of the download charts.

Social media too has seen huge growth in “free” betting games, with games such as DoubleDown Casino, Mirrorball Slots and Bingo Blitz boasting millions of players on Facebook.

Sally Gainsbury, a postdoctoral research fellow at Southern Cross University’s Centre for Gambling Education and Research, has been surveying people who gamble using the internet, mobile phones and digital TV. She reckons social media and smartphones are a major growth area.

Gainsbury says many of these games offer a “freemium” experience, meaning the app is free but players can fork out real money for extended features, bonus levels and more fake coins to play with. ”It really is a training, or priming, for real money gambling , which can then obviously end up with serious problems for when people spend more money than they can afford,” she said.

In Slotomania, for example, a new player starts off with 200 coins, which can disappear not long after signing up. To keep you playing Slotomania offers the chance to buy more coins with real money. The most popular in-app Slotomania purchase on iTunes is 18,000 coins, which costs $10.49. Essentially it’s paying to gamble for “fun”, without the opportunity of a pay-off.

Charles Livingstone, from the School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine at Monash University, is concerned games like Slotomania may be played by kids. He says kids with access to their parent’s credit card could get hooked on the game and easily buy the in-app purchases.

Slotomania — which was the top grossing iTunes app of 2012 — says it’s intended for players over 21, but is actually rated for ages 12+ in the iTunes app store with “frequent/intense simulated gambling”.

Should a 12-year-old be playing a slot machine, would you allow 12-year-olds into a casino? This is crazy stuff,” Livingstone told Crikey. “To all intents and purposes, it is gambling. The fact that you don’t win money is neither here nor there because it costs you money to keep using it.”

Gainsbury also has concerns with the unrealistic odds offered by these games, which may be more skewed in favour of the player than real-life gambling. People who win big on Facebook may not do so well at the local RSL.

They’re actually manipulated to encourage people to win, so that they enjoy the games,” Gainsbury told Crikey. “They’re supposed to be fun and entertaining, but they really misrepresent what gambling actually involves.”

Despite the regulatory issues, the global race to cash in on smartphone and social media gambling has already begun. According to Juniper Research, global annual betting through mobile handsets and tablets will top $100 billion by 2017, up from just under $20 billion last year.

In the UK, Facebook has teamed with online casino giant 888 (its poker game is fronted by Shane Warne) to offer real-money gambling on the social media network. That move follows the launch of Facebook’s first real-money betting game Bingo Friendzy in August, which offers bingo and slot machine gambling to those in the UK.

There are moves in the US to also allow online social casino games, with app market leader Zynga (Farmville and Mafia Wars) applying for a gambling license in Nevada. Crucially, all have cited the importance of the social aspect of these games as the reason for their interest.

Gainsbury doesn’t think Australians will be able to gamble real cash on Facebook or smartphones any time soon. But if there is a move to legalise, companies already offering simulated casino games are in the box seat. ”For a young person if they’re used to playing a free play game with a particular operator you’re much more likely to go on and play the real-money game with the same operator,” she said.

The Interactive Gaming Act is currently under review, with one likely change being the approval of online poker. The interim report has noted the issues surrounding social media and smartphone gambling, as well as the “free-to-play” simulation games.

The regulation is completely out of step with the current reality on internet gambling,” said Gainsbury. “It was created in 2001, which is just a lifetime ago in terms of where internet gambling was then.”

Gainsbury, who sent a submission to the review, believes there isn’t a lot of political will to move on online gambling. She thinks the government was spooked by the politically damaging pokies campaign, and doesn’t want to pick any more fights with powerful lobby groups.

Livingstone says games like Slotomania are pretty much unregulated — the sudden convergence of gambling and social media could cause major problems.

The danger in my mind is it becomes very difficult, particularly for young people, to discriminate between what is simply a bit of fun and something that can end up costing quite a lot of money,” he said. ”In a sense this is grooming them for real-world gambling where they will lose a lot more money, a lot more quickly than they think.”

7
  • 1
    Posted Friday, 11 January 2013 at 5:09 pm | Permalink

    I don’t wish to be uncharitable, but, if people have so little to do with their time than to play some of the gambling games mentioned, they don’t deserve to live.

  • 2
    andrew
    Posted Friday, 11 January 2013 at 6:42 pm | Permalink

    The same could be said for people who write stupid comments.

    Yes you.

    I wouldn’t agree. I’m above such nonsense.

  • 3
    sparky
    Posted Friday, 11 January 2013 at 7:30 pm | Permalink

    In game betting games are much more subtle. My grandson is playing a game, Far Cry, which has a Poker section to get money to buy (guns by the looks). Marketing Jesuit style.

  • 4
    Posted Sunday, 13 January 2013 at 2:04 pm | Permalink

    ANDREW: Yes, it was stupid, and not worthy of your attention.

  • 5
    Hamis Hill
    Posted Wednesday, 16 January 2013 at 5:13 pm | Permalink

    As the father of economics, Adam Smith pointed out, in an “Old ” economy like the China of two hundred years ago, the profitable money making niches had all, long since been occupied, leaving gambling as the only avenue to escape the doom of generations of grinding poverty.
    So it may not be that such people in present day Australia do not deserve to live but that, given their dim prospects, they hardly qualify for being alive at all.
    I blame Howard for killing the Australian economy with his $trillion mortgage debt, and creating a nation of desperate gamblers, which they certainly will be if they vote for his underling Abbott.
    In which case they will be dead, buried and cremated, by their own losing hand.
    Voting for a loser will do that won’t it?
    Its a Mug’s Game, mate!

  • 6
    Posted Thursday, 17 January 2013 at 5:16 pm | Permalink

    You left out alcohol. As for the unfortunate people living in grinding poverty, it will get worse. Thanks to big business, ditto the various religions, our birth rate makes us conceive like rabbits.

    Big business sees a bigger population as a way out of, or avoiding fiscal depressions. In fact a couple living in grinding poverty who produce seven children, only multiplies the problem seven times over.

    If the leader of the opposition gets into power it will probably double the amount of gaming venues. After all, it is the Church’s interests to have a malleable population.

  • 7
    Posted Wednesday, 30 January 2013 at 5:01 pm | Permalink

    Is there no limit on the amount of political control being levied in the name of our children? Cowie makes the point that internet games will cause children to become gamblers. Like other pre-internet children I used to collect cards. This was done by swapping, or at times, buying cards from another collector. Why is it that I have an allergy to gambling? Nor did I become a captain of industry.

    It is almost par for the course for people to “care about children” when what they really want is to control our lives. The censorship brigade wish to ban all internet comment, sex and knowledge-because of our children. The government loves this argument because a ban such as this would give them a supine electorate. In Victoria you’re fined for swearing-because of the children? Video games present an unparalleled field of opportunity for our children to become addicted to gambling. This rather than the continual barrage of sporting bets on TV? Next thing we know we will stopping our children from learning to swim-IN CASE THEY DROWN!

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...