Comments on: If Forbes can’t find powerful women, who can? http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/12/06/if-forbes-cant-find-powerful-women-who-can/ now with extra source Tue, 21 May 2013 12:38:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Patriot http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/12/06/if-forbes-cant-find-powerful-women-who-can/comment-page-1/#comment-231064 Patriot Thu, 06 Dec 2012 06:11:21 +0000 http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=336231#comment-231064 <blockquote><i>"How about redefining the meaning of powerful and influential. Can’t be that hard."</i></blockquote> Sure, why not. They just changed the meaning of <i>misogyny</i>. So go right ahead - redefine power for us, ladies. It's an open challenge. Can't be that hard.

“How about redefining the meaning of powerful and influential. Can’t be that hard.”

Sure, why not. They just changed the meaning of misogyny. So go right ahead - redefine power for us, ladies. It’s an open challenge. Can’t be that hard.

]]> By: Cyndi http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/12/06/if-forbes-cant-find-powerful-women-who-can/comment-page-1/#comment-231022 Cyndi Thu, 06 Dec 2012 02:59:41 +0000 http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=336231#comment-231022 Similarly, the last issue of The (Sydney) Magazine published its 100 most powerful (influential or whatever) people and could only come up with 33 women, most of whom work in the arts or other female-friendly professions. How about redefining the meaning of powerful and influential. Can't be that hard. Similarly, the last issue of The (Sydney) Magazine published its 100 most powerful (influential or whatever) people and could only come up with 33 women, most of whom work in the arts or other female-friendly professions.

How about redefining the meaning of powerful and influential. Can’t be that hard.

]]>