<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Refugees, education, ASIO: what else needs a royal commission?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/28/refugees-education-asio-what-else-needs-a-royal-commission/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/28/refugees-education-asio-what-else-needs-a-royal-commission/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:02:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve777</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/28/refugees-education-asio-what-else-needs-a-royal-commission/comment-page-1/#comment-230019</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve777</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 05:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=334325#comment-230019</guid>
		<description>I used to think that a system like the USA, with separation of the legislative and executive branches of Government, might be the way to go. Obviously we would retain the advantages of our system, including preferential voting, compulsory voting and an independent AEC. I noted how USA legislators were more independent and that votes in the House and Senate were not foregone conclusions. 

However, we now see US politics infected with the same type of hyper-partisanism that has bedevilled our system of government for the best part of a century. It seems to be more about how the business (game) of politics is played rather than a result of our Westminster system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to think that a system like the USA, with separation of the legislative and executive branches of Government, might be the way to go. Obviously we would retain the advantages of our system, including preferential voting, compulsory voting and an independent AEC. I noted how USA legislators were more independent and that votes in the House and Senate were not foregone conclusions. </p>
<p>However, we now see US politics infected with the same type of hyper-partisanism that has bedevilled our system of government for the best part of a century. It seems to be more about how the business (game) of politics is played rather than a result of our Westminster system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/28/refugees-education-asio-what-else-needs-a-royal-commission/comment-page-1/#comment-230007</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 04:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=334325#comment-230007</guid>
		<description>Like the &quot;War on Everything&quot; we need a &quot;Royal Commission on Everything&quot;

No, not really.  More like nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the &#8220;War on Everything&#8221; we need a &#8220;Royal Commission on Everything&#8221;</p>
<p>No, not really.  More like nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 526/535 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2013-05-25 03:06:55 -->