Crikey



Wasting billions in the run-up to the ‘growth cliff’

Gee ma, what was it like before the resources boom started? You know, in the olden days?

Well son, business invested in a range of industries because they saw growth prospects were good, or they took risks and invested in new areas in an attempt to pioneer the way.

But then we fell of the growth cliff?”

That’s right, son. We fell off it in 2017, just like that nice Michael Chaney warned us.”

We’ve been here before, so many times: a senior business figure uses the AFR or The Australian to talk palpable nonsense about the economy, unchallenged by any basic scepticism on the part of the relevant journalist or editors. Yes, we’re tired of pointing out how wrong they are, but we’re not going to stop. This garbage cannot stand unchallenged.

Today is Michael Chaney, who chairs Woodside and the National Australia Bank (and used to run Wesfarmers), who reckons “Australia is likely to fall off a ‘growth cliff’ when the resources investment boom ends in the next few years because the economy is not becoming more productive.

Economic growth was likely to slow to less than 2.5% after 2015 because of burdens on business, including overlapping state and federal environmental regulations, and Labor’s industrial relations system, which made the workplace less ­flexible, along with other problems,” Chaney is quoted as saying.

No mention of rising labour productivity, or restrained real wages growth under the Fair Work Act. No mention of actual facts.

The AFR and Chaney have again missed the contribution business makes to economic growth and productivity. They would have you believe that business is all-wise, that it makes no mistakes and every investment decision is based on thousands of person-hour testing, studies and manipulation crunching of discounted cash flows and feasibility studies.

That means Chaney’s bank and his other company, Woodside, have crunched the numbers intensively on rising costs for the new $40 billion LNG project the company wants to build, and factored in what the additional competition for scarce resources, such as labour, concrete, steel, etc will do to the feasiblity of the project. They would have asked themselves, for example, “how will the fact that every other resources company in the country is going hell-for-leather trying to develop projects do to the demand for skilled labour for such projects?” Given Chevron is competing for the same resources in building the Gorgon and Wheatstone project, Woodside obviously carefully determined that impact.

No?

These are investment decisions being made by boards and managements in the full knowledge (we hope) that there will be competition for scarce resources, which will force up costs, especially in the remote northwest of WA and offshore. BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto and Fortescue Metals are leading the charge to expand the WA iron ore industry in the same region, which adds further pressure to costs.

It’s not as if the government isn’t bending over backwards to assist the resources industry on this score — virtually throwing open our borders to skilled temporary labour while pumping money into training.

But let’s put those niggles to one side and focus on some other investment decisions. Overnight the huge US investment group, Blackstone bought the failed Top Ryde shopping centre for $A340 million, or less than half its $A720 million or so cost. Blackstone had also bought a loan from Suncorp over a Sydney office building for a 46% discount to face value, and last year acquired the Valad property group at a bargain basement price of $A207 million. The group had a couple of billion of real estate assets in Australia and the UK. Blackstone also bought paid $9.4 billion to Centro Properties for nearly 600 US shopping malls in March. Remember the losses in the various Centro companies total more than $A12 billion since 2007-08.

How is this relevant? They were all funded via loans, equity and other funds (derivatives etc) by banks and investors here and offshore.And they resulted in losses for the investors and financiers, money that could have been used more productively elsewhere. Australian banks and investors seem to have elevated their capacity to lose money in commercial property into some sort of black art form. Dud investments in all sorts of commercial property helped worsen the recession of the early 1990s and pushed Westpac and the ANZ to the brink of collapse. In the GFC, billions were lost in loans to ABC, Babcock and Brown and its various arms, Allco and Tricom, plus Valad, Mirvac, GPT, Citi Pacific, Centro, and other property groups.

Page 1 of 2 | Next page

Tags: , , ,

Categories: Companies, Economy, Journalism, Markets

5 Responses

Comments page: 1 |
  1. Well said!
    What about the waste in salaries Chaney and others have received in the past few years and their outrage at the government’s new two shareholder strikes and you are out rule?
    Hypocricy writ large!
    AFR and The Oz’s contribution to productivity is definitely in the minus range.

    by Daly on Nov 19, 2012 at 1:29 pm

  2. A national growth cliff you guys GLENN DYER AND BERNARD KEANE write about. And where are all those our elected representatives who are paid by us to look after our best interest? what are they still doing about preventing australians from falling off this fiscal cliff? Am I wrong to point out the government and world banking arrangements in place, are fiscally unhealthy to the grass roots community like me. Edward James

    by Edward James on Nov 19, 2012 at 3:17 pm

  3. Ever so well said, chaps.

    by Lance Boyle on Nov 19, 2012 at 4:09 pm

  4. How is it possible that we’ve managed to somehow turn the conversation about productivity to be about workers being greedy when company managers keep making losses and get rewarded for failure through ever higher and higher salaries and bonuses…

    by Maksimovic on Nov 19, 2012 at 6:29 pm

  5. Maksimovic consider how government keeps track of what is ready to be sent overseas.

    by Edward James on Nov 19, 2012 at 6:32 pm

« | »