Back off Andrea Yu: view from China

Poor Andrea Hodgkinson. Let the record show, your honour, that her crimes consist of asking questions at a press conference under an assumed name; of being Australian; and of responding too honestly to her various interviewers.

The first of those heinous deeds has already been committed by this correspondent. The second as well, actually. The last will hopefully never arise — that is the point of a pseudonym. It may not be why she chose to present herself as Andrea — or Andi  — Yu, but it is her right to do so.

For those of you who don’t work in the media and have yet to be exposed to this latest round of lint carefully extracted from navels, Andrea Yu is the biggest thing to have come out of the just-concluded Communist Party of China’s 18th National Congress.

Held about every five years, the Congress is a preordained pantomime that brings the internet and much traffic to a halt as China’s new leaders are sworn in. They are selected rather than elected, months and months before the Congress itself — the phrase “leader-in-waiting“ has marched like a weary herald before the name of new President Xi Jinping for most of this year, and will continue to do so until March 2013 when he officially takes power.

This air of predetermination sends newspaper editors and journalists wishing and hoping and praying for a surprise, but China dispensed with most of the dramatics long before the Congress. Bo Xilai, the former Chongqing Party chief who was earmarked for power before a spectacular fall from grace, has turned into a uniquely Chinese bogeyman. “You heard of the big guy called Bo?” asks one local, covering her mouth with a scarf in case of watching eyes or cameras. “Cause too much trouble, and you might meet him.”

The Congress was at least noteworthy for cementing the ascendancy of the princelings, the children of influential Chinese officials who have been weaned on power and retained their taste for it. Xi, for example, is the son of a revolutionary leader and economic reformer, and he has managed the rare feat of simultaneously being chosen to lead the Communist party and the country’s military.

And while there have been calls for increased political and economic openness, particularly from China’s increasingly influential (and knowledgeable) base of social media users, the Congress hasn’t really changed very much about the lives of the vast majority of China’s populace.

Unfortunately, this makes for equally unexciting coverage. Which is where our new friend Andrea comes in.

In the Great Hall of the People, which squats elegantly at the western edge of Tiananmen Square, saying that it is uncommon for foreign journalists to feature heavily at press conferences is a bit like saying that it is unusual for snow to feature prominently in the Sahara. Yu was given four questions at at least two press conferences with party officials —  a briefing that included officials from the National Development and Reform Commission, and a news conference with Jiang Weixin, minister and secretary of the CPC Leadership Group of the Ministry of Housing And Urban-Rural Development. Foreign eyebrows were jolted skywards, and the googling began.

Sample question from Yu: “Please tell us what policies and plans the Chinese government will be implementing in cooperation with Australia.”

Yu said she was representing Global CAMG Media International. Some digging from the ABC revealed that the company is in fact Beijing-owned, and her soft questions were essentially a way for China to control the English-language coverage of the event.

Page 1 of 2 | Next page

Tags: , ,

Categories: Asia-Pacific, MEDIA

12 Responses

Comments page: 1 |
  1. If these critics want to slag off at “Yu”, why haven’t they been practicing on the “clever Dix” in our domesticated media, lap-dogs with lipstick?

    by klewso on Nov 16, 2012 at 2:23 pm

  2. An extraordinary article, and an extraordinary defence of deceitful, dishonest conduct by someone purporting to be a journalist. Tellingly, no discussion - let alone criticism - of the direct and/or indirect employers of this poor patsy either. The closest our correspondant comes to this issue is ludicrously supposing that Ms Hodgkinson could be covertly working towards circumventing a propaganda machine posing as a journalistic outlet from the inside. Surely there are more deserving targets for our pity or sympathy than this defence of the indefensible?

    by O'Connor Mark on Nov 16, 2012 at 2:49 pm

  3. Who is Kway Teow?

    by Fegus Ryan on Nov 16, 2012 at 3:09 pm

  4. Well done Andrea, a young Journo learning the ropes. A better example of her work is here:

    Sad that at an event as managed as the CCP Congress so many experienced Journo’s see Andrea’s rise to prominence as the big story.

    by Brendan McNally on Nov 16, 2012 at 3:32 pm

  5. A pseudonymous journalist writing about another (possibly) pseudonymous journalist who has been the subject of scrutiny by other journalists. It sounds a little bit incestuous…

    I think the critism of Andrea is a bit over the top. Many journalists ask questions to satisfy the demands of their employers rather than asking the toughest or most important questions. It’s a pity there wasn’t a bit more attention paid to which journalists asked what questions and why at every media event. It would shed quite a lot of light on how the media works around the world, not just in China.

    by David R on Nov 16, 2012 at 3:40 pm

  6. Shock horror, PR person impersonates actual journalist.

    World ……….. ending ………… now!

    There are plenty of working journalists in Australia who ask questions every bit as dorothy dixer to our pollies under the guise of actual news.

    And there is the entire right wing media propaganda unit who ask the most benign questions of TA et al while berating the Prime Minister for turning up late to a radio show.

    I think only journalists think there is a clear line between journalism and PR these days, and I doubt any of them would defend ALL of their supposedly bone fide colleagues.

    Storm - teacup.

    by Dogs breakfast on Nov 16, 2012 at 4:04 pm

  7. Dogs “PR person impersonates actual journalist”? Was she auditioning for a Limited News job?

    by klewso on Nov 16, 2012 at 7:54 pm

  8. The title “Back off…., view from China” says it all about Kway Teow’s allegiance: he is repeating the unconscious or ‘unsolicited’ expression of the ‘establishment’s’ view. That establishment is the communist party in China, and the world must challenge the chinese communist party, because it at times exemplifies corrupt antics, dishonesty, and by any standard: criminality.

    by craig z on Nov 18, 2012 at 10:37 am

  9. nicely put fat fried noodle. I thought she sounded in an invidious position in her ABC interview and handled it with some aplomb and even dignity.

    by SBH on Nov 18, 2012 at 12:33 pm

  10. Thanks for providing a breath of fresh air and a bit of sanity in a rather nasty environment. I too feel a lot of sympathy for her, and wish more of the criticisms from professional journalists were directed at the CCP themselves, instead of a young girl from Melbourne.

    The only point I’d like to correct you on is that Andrea Yu isn’t a pseudonym.

    by Georgina W on Nov 19, 2012 at 1:06 pm

  11. The writer should be stir-fried for this effort…..

    by Andrew Davison on Nov 19, 2012 at 6:22 pm

  12. Factual Correction: Andrea Yu is not a pseudonym, it’s her legal married name.

    by Jane Ben on Nov 19, 2012 at 6:54 pm

« | »