<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How could they all get it so wrong?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:30:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EKDV</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-227814</link>
		<dc:creator>EKDV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 05:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329719#comment-227814</guid>
		<description>If you enjoy a good dose of schadenfreude, go to Facebook, look up Mitt Romney&#039;s page and hit Refresh every ten seconds and watch the number of Likes drop like flies. It&#039;s hypnotic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you enjoy a good dose of schadenfreude, go to Facebook, look up Mitt Romney&#8217;s page and hit Refresh every ten seconds and watch the number of Likes drop like flies. It&#8217;s hypnotic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holden Back</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-227745</link>
		<dc:creator>Holden Back</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 22:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329719#comment-227745</guid>
		<description>Pundit is derived from &lt;i&gt;pandit&lt;/i&gt;, Sanskrit for knowledgeable.  OED definition of pundit is, partly &quot;someone who makes knowledgeable or authoritative pronouncements&quot;.


So technically, these people aren&#039;t pundits anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pundit is derived from <i>pandit</i>, Sanskrit for knowledgeable.  OED definition of pundit is, partly &#8220;someone who makes knowledgeable or authoritative pronouncements&#8221;.</p>
<p>So technically, these people aren&#8217;t pundits anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHRISTOPHER DUNNE</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-227739</link>
		<dc:creator>CHRISTOPHER DUNNE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329719#comment-227739</guid>
		<description>The GOP was for &#039;anyone but Mitt&#039;, and then the entire nation was for &#039;not Mitt&#039; too.

Who couldn&#039;t see this coming? Apart from the world&#039;s smartest CEO and his cronies, that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GOP was for &#8216;anyone but Mitt&#8217;, and then the entire nation was for &#8216;not Mitt&#8217; too.</p>
<p>Who couldn&#8217;t see this coming? Apart from the world&#8217;s smartest CEO and his cronies, that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacKinnon Jenny</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-227731</link>
		<dc:creator>MacKinnon Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 23:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329719#comment-227731</guid>
		<description>Nice one. That is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one. That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael r james</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-227725</link>
		<dc:creator>michael r james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 05:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329719#comment-227725</guid>
		<description>OK, can&#039;t help myself citing some more Rosenbaum (for Crikey readers): more on the Bruce hypothesis:

[The question of sincerity and why Bruce made the difference—OK, a key difference—in the final outcome brings us to the Romney and Snooki connection and the self-tanning controversy. It will be little noted nor long remembered, as some previous president once wrote, that Mitt Romney—when asked, long before Sandy, who was his favorite pop culture icon (between Snooki and Honey Boo Boo)—claimed that he really liked Snooki (“so energetic”), making it seem as if he were a regular, Jersey Shore-watching guy.
.
I’m serious. Has there ever been a more transparent and contemptible lie? Sure, it’s a minor point. But it’s contemptible because it displays (like the 47 percent line) Romney’s contempt for the “little people.” Throw them a name from their vulgar culture and they’ll eat it up on the food-stamp lines.
.
He thinks ordinary people are so stupid they’d actually believe he and his wife and maybe his “dancing horse” (as Snoop Dogg, among others, memorably called the steed) sit down together to watch Snooki and the Sitch. Give me an effen&#039; break.
.
The nature of this inauthenticity, this shallowness, is so deep it’s almost fathomless. Couple that with another forgotten pre-Sandy campaign controversy: Does Romney use self-tanner, as this Jezebel roundup suggests? Or is it just “full makeup,” as this Times story euphemizes?
.
I don’t begrudge Snooki her self-tanning. But a presidential candidate who needs to be so heavily made up can be said to be, on some fundamental or at least metaphorical level, “made up.”
.
And I think that’s where Bruce’s championing of Obama comes in.
For just enough of those voters, the doubting ones, the election of the president became a choice not between Obama and Romney but between Bruce and Romney. You know who won.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, can&#8217;t help myself citing some more Rosenbaum (for Crikey readers): more on the Bruce hypothesis:</p>
<blockquote><p>The question of sincerity and why Bruce made the difference—OK, a key difference—in the final outcome brings us to the Romney and Snooki connection and the self-tanning controversy. It will be little noted nor long remembered, as some previous president once wrote, that Mitt Romney—when asked, long before Sandy, who was his favorite pop culture icon (between Snooki and Honey Boo Boo)—claimed that he really liked Snooki (“so energetic”), making it seem as if he were a regular, Jersey Shore-watching guy.<br />
.<br />
I’m serious. Has there ever been a more transparent and contemptible lie? Sure, it’s a minor point. But it’s contemptible because it displays (like the 47 percent line) Romney’s contempt for the “little people.” Throw them a name from their vulgar culture and they’ll eat it up on the food-stamp lines.<br />
.<br />
He thinks ordinary people are so stupid they’d actually believe he and his wife and maybe his “dancing horse” (as Snoop Dogg, among others, memorably called the steed) sit down together to watch Snooki and the Sitch. Give me an effen&#8217; break.<br />
.<br />
The nature of this inauthenticity, this shallowness, is so deep it’s almost fathomless. Couple that with another forgotten pre-Sandy campaign controversy: Does Romney use self-tanner, as this Jezebel roundup suggests? Or is it just “full makeup,” as this Times story euphemizes?<br />
.<br />
I don’t begrudge Snooki her self-tanning. But a presidential candidate who needs to be so heavily made up can be said to be, on some fundamental or at least metaphorical level, “made up.”<br />
.<br />
And I think that’s where Bruce’s championing of Obama comes in.<br />
For just enough of those voters, the doubting ones, the election of the president became a choice not between Obama and Romney but between Bruce and Romney. You know who won.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael r james</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-227724</link>
		<dc:creator>michael r james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 05:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329719#comment-227724</guid>
		<description>Further to previous post, and in response to Guy&#039;s question of how the Repubs could get it so wrong? Obviously they are not Bruce fans, and Chris Christie (and of course BO); Rosenbaum: (I can&#039;t imagine there will ever be a NJ politician to claim they not Bruce fans but Christie appears to be genuinely OTT!)

[Several more days are then devoted to analyzing what it all meant. Some exit polls show that 40 percent of voters felt that Obama’s hurricane response—or what they saw of it—was an important factor in their vote.
This, by the way, is the &lt;b&gt;Chris Christie who claims to have attended 100 Bruce Springsteen concerts &lt;/b&gt; (which is a little sad you have to admit—it’s true I have mixed feelings about the fat guv). He’s an emotional guy whose sense of urgency about the plight his coast faced must have been shot through, somehow, with a Springsteenian sense of the perilous beauty and tragic aura of the devastated boardwalk towns. And then we learn that &lt;b&gt;Obama got Bruce Springsteen—who’d previously been standoffish with the GOP gov—to call Chris Christie from Air Force One. &lt;/b&gt; After which a jubilant Christie confessed that when Bruce had hugged him during a brief meeting at a Sandy telethon—before Bruce went back on the road with Obama—Christie had gone home and wept! Bruce was Chris Christie’s Sandy. (Which must have led to more teeth-grinding at Romney HQ: What was Bruce doing on Air Force One?)]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further to previous post, and in response to Guy&#8217;s question of how the Repubs could get it so wrong? Obviously they are not Bruce fans, and Chris Christie (and of course BO); Rosenbaum: (I can&#8217;t imagine there will ever be a NJ politician to claim they not Bruce fans but Christie appears to be genuinely OTT!)</p>
<blockquote><p>Several more days are then devoted to analyzing what it all meant. Some exit polls show that 40 percent of voters felt that Obama’s hurricane response—or what they saw of it—was an important factor in their vote.<br />
This, by the way, is the <b>Chris Christie who claims to have attended 100 Bruce Springsteen concerts </b> (which is a little sad you have to admit—it’s true I have mixed feelings about the fat guv). He’s an emotional guy whose sense of urgency about the plight his coast faced must have been shot through, somehow, with a Springsteenian sense of the perilous beauty and tragic aura of the devastated boardwalk towns. And then we learn that <b>Obama got Bruce Springsteen—who’d previously been standoffish with the GOP gov—to call Chris Christie from Air Force One. </b> After which a jubilant Christie confessed that when Bruce had hugged him during a brief meeting at a Sandy telethon—before Bruce went back on the road with Obama—Christie had gone home and wept! Bruce was Chris Christie’s Sandy. (Which must have led to more teeth-grinding at Romney HQ: What was Bruce doing on Air Force One?)</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael r james</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-227723</link>
		<dc:creator>michael r james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 05:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329719#comment-227723</guid>
		<description>Hey GR, Slate finally caught up:

[((slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/the_spectator/2012/11/bruce_springsteen_elected_barack_obama_the_strange_confluence_of_sandy_snooki.html))
How Bruce Springsteen Elected Barack Obama
Sandy, Snooki, Christie, Bruce, and Barack.
By Ron Rosenbaum &#124; Posted Friday, Nov. 9, 2012
.
Sandy—the elusive, iconic Jersey girl—appears on Bruce’s album, The Wild, the Innocent &amp; the E Street Shuffle. “Fourth of July …” is a song that evokes in a strained but heartfelt way the poignant and seamy, the doomed wild and innocent romanticism of the old Jersey shore.
If you listen—it doesn&#039;t quite come across in cold type—you can hear the beautiful desperation that would run throughout Springsteen&#039;s best work:
.
Sandy (the song) has even got a dangerous fortune teller on its boardwalk:
“Did you hear the cops finally busted Madame Marie for tellin’ fortunes better than they do?” (A prefiguration of Nate Silver?)]
.....................
Rosenbaum is probably my generation. That was my coming of age era and so those first three albums were imprinted on me forever. Yeah, even/especially the verbose Dylanesque first two. By the time the later ones came around I was too distracted by all the usual to pay as much attention. Funny thing is, 2 decades later one of my doctoral students in Oxford was a big Bruce fan but was surprised when --in response to him playing the 80s works over and over-- I played those early albums on our lab ghetto blaster (Well, Wild &amp; Innocent; everyone knows Born to Run).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey GR, Slate finally caught up:</p>
<blockquote><p>((slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/the_spectator/2012/11/bruce_springsteen_elected_barack_obama_the_strange_confluence_of_sandy_snooki.html))<br />
How Bruce Springsteen Elected Barack Obama<br />
Sandy, Snooki, Christie, Bruce, and Barack.<br />
By Ron Rosenbaum | Posted Friday, Nov. 9, 2012<br />
.<br />
Sandy—the elusive, iconic Jersey girl—appears on Bruce’s album, The Wild, the Innocent &amp; the E Street Shuffle. “Fourth of July …” is a song that evokes in a strained but heartfelt way the poignant and seamy, the doomed wild and innocent romanticism of the old Jersey shore.<br />
If you listen—it doesn&#8217;t quite come across in cold type—you can hear the beautiful desperation that would run throughout Springsteen&#8217;s best work:<br />
.<br />
Sandy (the song) has even got a dangerous fortune teller on its boardwalk:<br />
“Did you hear the cops finally busted Madame Marie for tellin’ fortunes better than they do?” (A prefiguration of Nate Silver?)</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;<br />
Rosenbaum is probably my generation. That was my coming of age era and so those first three albums were imprinted on me forever. Yeah, even/especially the verbose Dylanesque first two. By the time the later ones came around I was too distracted by all the usual to pay as much attention. Funny thing is, 2 decades later one of my doctoral students in Oxford was a big Bruce fan but was surprised when&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;in response to him playing the 80s works over and over&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;I played those early albums on our lab ghetto blaster (Well, Wild &amp; Innocent; everyone knows Born to Run).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari Sharp</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-227710</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari Sharp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 18:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329719#comment-227710</guid>
		<description>Thrilled to see pundits are being held to account for their inaccurate predictions. Should happen in politics, economics, and plenty of other contexts.

And track record should then be a key determinant of whether we should bother listening to them next time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thrilled to see pundits are being held to account for their inaccurate predictions. Should happen in politics, economics, and plenty of other contexts.</p>
<p>And track record should then be a key determinant of whether we should bother listening to them next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattsui</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-227707</link>
		<dc:creator>mattsui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 13:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329719#comment-227707</guid>
		<description>So, it&#039;s all over.... and no zombie apocalypse?
Thanks, GR. Looking forward to 2016.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, it&#8217;s all over&#8230;. and no zombie apocalypse?<br />
Thanks, GR. Looking forward to 2016.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham R</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-227706</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 12:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329719#comment-227706</guid>
		<description>Free-form Interview Poems. That&#039;s just beautiful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free-form Interview Poems. That&#8217;s just beautiful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Hilliger</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-227681</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Hilliger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 07:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329719#comment-227681</guid>
		<description>It seems that Fux News and their - the spin stops here - and their portrayal and feature of a collection of right wing loons with their views has actually helped Obama to his magnificent win.  I believe Obama should thank Fux News for their assistance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that Fux News and their - the spin stops here - and their portrayal and feature of a collection of right wing loons with their views has actually helped Obama to his magnificent win.  I believe Obama should thank Fux News for their assistance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-227678</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 07:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329719#comment-227678</guid>
		<description>There is a lovely bit in the book &quot;Winnie the Pooh&quot; about Wol, who was known as the wisest one In the Forest,  &quot;because he could spell Tuesday, even though he couldn&#039;t spell it properly&quot;.  Just like the Republican pundits like Fred Barnes, &quot;deferred to for his expert analysis&quot;, even though that analysis is completely wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a lovely bit in the book &#8220;Winnie the Pooh&#8221; about Wol, who was known as the wisest one In the Forest,  &#8220;because he could spell Tuesday, even though he couldn&#8217;t spell it properly&#8221;.  Just like the Republican pundits like Fred Barnes, &#8220;deferred to for his expert analysis&#8221;, even though that analysis is completely wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: illywhacker</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-227676</link>
		<dc:creator>illywhacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 07:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329719#comment-227676</guid>
		<description>Whenever I need a good laugh I re-read this piece: https://theconversation.edu.au/the-next-president-of-the-united-states-will-be-rick-perry-2831</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever I need a good laugh I re-read this piece: <a href="https://theconversation.edu.au/the-next-president-of-the-united-states-will-be-rick-perry-2831" rel="nofollow">https://theconversation.edu.au/the-next-president-of-the-united-states-will-be-rick-perry-2831</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tonyfunnywalker</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-227670</link>
		<dc:creator>tonyfunnywalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 06:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329719#comment-227670</guid>
		<description>The resemblance to News Ltd and the Liberal party is extraordinary. Abbott and News Ltd have played the same game assuming a short tenure at the Lodge. They did not have to work on policy but having long lunch with their mates and doing many good but insignificant things while the attack dogs did their dirty work. In a previous blogg I wrote about the fact that they were playing the game assuming it was won at the first bounce. It cost Obama the House, Gillard only had to contend with Rudd and the Polls.
Obama defined the &quot; genius&quot; Gillard is defying Alan Jones. At this stage the Liberals need a &quot; hail Mary&quot; or 2 to win the next election and changing Abbott for Turnbull is too little to late.  Gillard is kicking goals from outside 50 and even reversals are now counted as &quot; behinds&quot; and the scoreboard is kept ticking over. Even Kevin is prepared to handball a few as he wants to keep his seat and return to to the front bench.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The resemblance to News Ltd and the Liberal party is extraordinary. Abbott and News Ltd have played the same game assuming a short tenure at the Lodge. They did not have to work on policy but having long lunch with their mates and doing many good but insignificant things while the attack dogs did their dirty work. In a previous blogg I wrote about the fact that they were playing the game assuming it was won at the first bounce. It cost Obama the House, Gillard only had to contend with Rudd and the Polls.<br />
Obama defined the &#8221; genius&#8221; Gillard is defying Alan Jones. At this stage the Liberals need a &#8221; hail Mary&#8221; or 2 to win the next election and changing Abbott for Turnbull is too little to late.  Gillard is kicking goals from outside 50 and even reversals are now counted as &#8221; behinds&#8221; and the scoreboard is kept ticking over. Even Kevin is prepared to handball a few as he wants to keep his seat and return to to the front bench.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zut alors</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-227655</link>
		<dc:creator>zut alors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 05:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329719#comment-227655</guid>
		<description>Emmett Tyrell: &#039;Next week President Obama goes into retirement. I hope he will consider Hawaii.&#039; 

I imagine The Donald&#039;s response would be &quot;Why Hawaii? He&#039;s never been there!!&quot;

These are buoyant times, Mr Rundle, relish every minute. And remember not to dehydrate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emmett Tyrell: &#8216;Next week President Obama goes into retirement. I hope he will consider Hawaii.&#8217; </p>
<p>I imagine The Donald&#8217;s response would be &#8220;Why Hawaii? He&#8217;s never been there!!&#8221;</p>
<p>These are buoyant times, Mr Rundle, relish every minute. And remember not to dehydrate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ianjohnno1</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-227650</link>
		<dc:creator>ianjohnno1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 04:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329719#comment-227650</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;...a Cheshire Cat with fluid retention problems&lt;/i&gt;.
What a beautiful image to retain in memory of the event.
Bottoms up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8230;a Cheshire Cat with fluid retention problems</i>.<br />
What a beautiful image to retain in memory of the event.<br />
Bottoms up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alderson Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-227638</link>
		<dc:creator>Alderson Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 04:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329719#comment-227638</guid>
		<description>You forgot to mention the House of Representatives. Don&#039;t the Republicans have the numbers in that? And aren&#039;t both places designed to block whatever is passed by the other? That the American system is based on stopping progress instead of promoting it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot to mention the House of Representatives. Don&#8217;t the Republicans have the numbers in that? And aren&#8217;t both places designed to block whatever is passed by the other? That the American system is based on stopping progress instead of promoting it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clytie</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-227634</link>
		<dc:creator>Clytie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 04:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329719#comment-227634</guid>
		<description>No wonder Republicans were so shocked by this loss. They&#039;d had a Reality Distortion Field extended around them. Their (thought) leaders have been hyping them up for weeks. Now they feel betrayed.

&quot;We hope our candidate will win, but mathematical polling shows X,&quot; would have been much more honest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No wonder Republicans were so shocked by this loss. They&#8217;d had a Reality Distortion Field extended around them. Their (thought) leaders have been hyping them up for weeks. Now they feel betrayed.</p>
<p><span class="dquo">&#8220;</span>We hope our candidate will win, but mathematical polling shows X,&#8221; would have been much more honest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CL de Footscray</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-227631</link>
		<dc:creator>CL de Footscray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 03:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329719#comment-227631</guid>
		<description>This is terrific stuff. Only HST could do it as well, but he&#039;d probably be too whacked to meet deadline. Thanks Guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is terrific stuff. Only HST could do it as well, but he&#8217;d probably be too whacked to meet deadline. Thanks Guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-227626</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 03:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329719#comment-227626</guid>
		<description>Ah Schadenfruede...can&#039;t get enough of it..particularly when it concerns the gallery of freaks and deadheads that comprise the Republicans. Bring on Abbott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah Schadenfruede&#8230;can&#8217;t get enough of it..particularly when it concerns the gallery of freaks and deadheads that comprise the Republicans. Bring on Abbott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ulysses butterfly</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-227623</link>
		<dc:creator>ulysses butterfly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 03:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329719#comment-227623</guid>
		<description>Shoulda been higher in the ezine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shoulda been higher in the ezine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paddy</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-227618</link>
		<dc:creator>paddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 03:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329719#comment-227618</guid>
		<description>LOL I just hope you had as much fun writing that, as I had reading it Guy. 
Whoever says schadenfreude is a bitter draught is wrong? 
It&#039;s bloody delicious! 
Cheers and enjoy the scotch. You&#039;ve more than earned it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL I just hope you had as much fun writing that, as I had reading it Guy.<br />
Whoever says schadenfreude is a bitter draught is wrong?<br />
It&#8217;s bloody delicious!<br />
Cheers and enjoy the scotch. You&#8217;ve more than earned it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cross Byron Douglas</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/11/09/rundle-how-could-they-all-get-it-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-227613</link>
		<dc:creator>Cross Byron Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 03:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=329719#comment-227613</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the Storm Sandy Devotional Guy.   I have been waiting for it from someone all week.   David McComb would have been thrilled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the Storm Sandy Devotional Guy.   I have been waiting for it from someone all week.   David McComb would have been thrilled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1305/1314 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2013-06-20 00:00:51 -->