Facebook Google Menu Linkedin lock Pinterest Search Twitter



Oct 22, 2012

Labor's obsession with surplus prompts a genuine mini-budget

The government has unveiled a raft of savings measures as part of its MYEFO, with revenue falling yet again. There's more savings than usual from this government -- and a few tricks thrown in.

User login status :


The government’s Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook was released this morning and, despite a further round of savings and tax increases totalling over $16 billion over four years, the government has had to shave its surplus for this year to a mere $1.1 billion and reduced its forecast surpluses over the forward estimates to cope with a further downgrade in tax revenue.

Treasury has downgraded its forecasts for GDP, employment growth and inflation for this financial year and next, with economic growth predicted to be 3% for both years (down from the budget forecast of 3.25% this year) but expects unemployment to remain as forecast in May.

To meet the revenue shortfall of $4 billion forecast for this year, the government announced a series of savings initiatives, including:

  • Changes to the calculation and indexation of the private health insurance rebate, saving $700 million over forward estimates (FEs)
  • Removal of the private health insurance rebate from lifetime health cover ($386 million over FEs)
  • Increases in visa application charges, with over $500 million over FEs
  • Changes to the treatment of fringe benefits ($445 million over FEs)
  • A change to the treatment of lost superannuation accounts that will deliver an immediate windfall of over $550 million
  • An increase in the tax levy on self-managed superannuation funds worth $319 million over FEs
  • Savings from redirected grants programs, including pushing back some spending into later years
  • Reduction in the Baby Bonus to $3000 for second and later children, saving $500 million over FEs from next financial year.

Against those savings, the government has had to spend $4.2 billion on its new dental scheme, starting next financial year, additional health spending in Tasmania ($325 million), an extra $490 million on its response to the Houston panel report and more on Afghanistan (an extra US$100 million in support for the Afghan government).

The biggest cuts to revenue have come from lower company tax ($2 billion this year), and a $1 billion annual fall (or around one-third!) in MRRT revenue due to declining commodity prices (and perhaps the reality check of the first instalments coming from the big miners). However, the states have had a little luck, with Treasury forecasting around a billion extra dollars in GST revenue over FEs.

While economic growth is generally forecast to be a little softer, for the first time in a while Treasury has lifted its expectations of the crucial housing sector, with growth next year expected to reach 4%, offset by lower-than-forecast levels of non-dwelling construction; forecasts of overall government spending across the economy have also been revised down. Our terms of trade are expected to decline 8% this year rather than 5.75%, and next year has been revised down as well. Treasury has revised down its forecasts for the growth in our region, with China and Japan revised down in growth forecasts, along with India.

Beyond the big savings that will garner attention, the government has presented a long list of additional small savings measures that wouldn’t be out of place in a budget statement. This is a genuine mini-budget, and with more real savings than usual for this government, which has tended to gloss over the difference between actual spending cuts and tax rises. There are, as always, a few tricks, including pushing still more spending into 2013-14. But for all the efforts among some in the commentariat to mount a campaign against its profligacy in areas like the NDIS and Gonski, the fiscal discipline of this government, now into its fifth year, remains strong.

The broader issue, however, is whether this obsession with surplus remains appropriate given the economy is now seen as softer than previously by both Treasury and the RBA. The government has handed full responsibility for maintaining jobs and economic growth to the RBA board, and indeed boasted about it. No longer are fiscal and monetary policy working in tandem, as Wayne Swan once boasted; rather the government emphasises the contractionary nature of its fiscal policy as the basis for further loosening of monetary policy.

Bernard Keane — Politics Editor

Bernard Keane

Politics Editor

Bernard Keane is Crikey’s political editor. Before that he was Crikey’s Canberra press gallery correspondent, covering politics, national security and economics.

Get a free trial to post comments
More from Bernard Keane


We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola


Leave a comment

47 thoughts on “Labor’s obsession with surplus prompts a genuine mini-budget

  1. Hamis Hill

    Jimmy, having owned a couple of homes on a mortgage I found myself surprised to have not calculated the total cost over the twenty year repayment period.
    (Just happy to be no longer paying exorbitant rent)
    But perhaps other people were more concerned with speculating, (obsessing?) upon the increase in the value of their homes over the long run.
    As it averaged out the increased value of the property just about equaled the total amount paid in capital and interest for the home.
    It follows that when house prices do not rise to cover the total cost of interest and original capital then the real cost, over the life of the loan, will be much more than the final value of the home.
    People might think twice about taking on such a losing bargain.
    But, again, the “Market” ie the new buyers, willing to pay for the whole expense of the home to the original buyers have to get the money from somewhere, and the banks provide the money by way of new loans.
    In short you might think you are buying a $500,000 house but you are paying perhaps $2.5 million over the life of the loan.
    Fine if there is someone out there willing to take it off your hands for this amount.
    So the Capital Gains balance the interest payments.
    So what? except that the asset does not change but its price is mightily “inflated” which with everything else is supposed to be bad.
    But the personal pain to the Debt Junkies (it has to be a form of addiction)in the absence of capital gain is very real and measurable.
    The ordinary person would have to be very insensitive to ignore the cost of 60% of their disposable income going to the mortgage at the expense of all the other things they might wish to invest in, like a savings account, without enjoying the compensation of ever increasing house prices.
    Take away the ever increasing house prices, as has happened during the post GFC Labor governments, and the sentiment (promoted and selectively directed by the conservatives to this critical middle class voting group of battling aspirationals) that everything has gone to hell is pretty hard for them to ignore.
    Reducing interest rates take some of the pain away but not enough to allow those so affected to even look at the great economic figures.
    A question for Barnaby Joyce might be could Aussies afford to invest in their own mines and Cubbies Stations if they did not owe a startling $1.3 TRILLION on their mortgages?
    This is only a dillema for Labor, who actually care about the nation and its economy, for the speculation in housing is deeply entrenched and deeply emotionally linked to the very identity and social standing of the debt addicts.
    The conservatives only pander to the victims of their Golden Era where house prices rose four times and became the only topic of conversation.
    We are living in the economic aftermath of Howard’s housing incontinence and his battling aspirationals have been rendered beyond reason by their pain and disappointment.
    Perhaps they should not be allowed to vote because they may be just about to take the rest of the economy with them to an inevitable Abbott Recession slash and burn hell.

Leave a comment