tip off

Rundle: Romney sorta won the debate because Obama didn’t

Mitt Romney won the debate for the simple reason that Barack Obama lost it, our man in the US reckons. And the latest polling shows voters tend to agree.

One day after the second debate, and the results are in — everyone thinks Barack Obama won it, or at least fought Mitt Romney to a draw. Instant polling after the event also gave Obama the win, with the CNN poll showing a seven-point edge over Romney: 46% to 39%.

It’s worth noting there’s a 4% error margin on that poll — but it’s also worth noting the sample was 33/33/33% Republicans/Democrats/independents, where the Republicans are actually only about 24% of the general population. So, to use a technical statistical term, eeeeh y’know.

The figures are also borne out by the qualitative analysis, with most pundits in the Mitt moshpit known as the National Review scoring it a draw, and the Left pundits who were tearing their hair out at Obama’s initial performance have come back to suckle at the teat.

Andrew Sullivan, ex-conservative and continuing doofus, was best: having previously dubbed Obama the “black Reagan”, he declared the election lost after the first debate, now returned, practically weeping, saying it was the “Obama I always knew”.

Well, maybe. Your correspondent, perhaps on a pessimistic jag, judged the debate a sort of win for Romney, which garnered a few hits from the peanut gallery. And when you look at the event in clips, with Romney’s various turns — cross-questioning Obama like a motel cleaner suspected of stealing his cufflinks, Obama saying that Romney’s five-point plan was a “one-point plan”, moderator Candy Crowley correcting Romney as to whether Obama had spoken of a “terror attack” the day after the Benghazi attack and, last but not least, Romney’s bizarre remark that people brought him “binders of women” to choose amongst in staffing his Massachusetts executive — there were no real clips showing Obama in a similar light. So that counts as a win.

But these are all victories on the pundit principle, of performance and besting. It’s not necessarily the way people watch the debate, especially those clowns (sorry, citizens) who are yet to make up their mind, between two substantially different ethical and political approaches to the organisation of society.

There, I thought, and still think, that Romney won the debate for the simple reason that Obama lost it. Though the President took the fight to Romney right from the top, he failed to follow through — coming back to his own record. Yet Obama’s own record only passes muster by reference to what would have happened had he not done what he had. The only thing that the middling American recovery looks good beside is the potential depression, unemployment spike and auto industry collapse that would have occurred — or can be argued would have occurred — had the Republicans got their mitts on the big House again.

That’s arguing a counterfactual, and difficult to do, but essential. The great example of that is Paul Keating’s 1993 victory over John Hewson, in which the prime minister stooped to jam it up the opposition leader’s freckle. The spectacle of the Blade Runner style blasted earth that would be implemented days after Hewson landed in the Lodge was sufficient to drive a grumbling populace back to Papa.

Obama hasn’t swung that, and there’s no chance he will really try. In the absence of such, Romney’s economic plan — ze plan, ze plan — continues to impress people. The polls bear this out. A CBS poll had Romney rated as better on the economy: 65% to 34%. That’s a major lead in the area where people will be listening very carefully. In that respect, I suspect there will be no major bounce back to Obama on the basis of his overall win.

Mind you, one poll had Obama winning by 51% to 17% among undecided voters. The poll in question was taken by, erm, Xbox, via a survey on Xbox Live’s “election channel”. Say what? No, me neither. But the Italian plumber vote is sewn up, blah blah, other sad lapsed cultural references, signs off, opens beer, sigh.

23
  • 1
    ianjohnno1
    Posted Thursday, 18 October 2012 at 12:56 pm | Permalink

    …especially those clowns (sorry, citizens) who are yet to make up their mind, between two substantially different ethical and political approaches to the organisation of society.

    Could not agree more. While there is something to be said for politics as sport/entertainment, it seems strange to me that so many are “floaters”.

  • 2
    Andybob
    Posted Thursday, 18 October 2012 at 1:15 pm | Permalink

    Guy is getting the vote out going to make as big a difference this time as it did for Obama last time ? Has that tree been shaken and all the low hanging fruit is now taken into account ?

  • 3
    paddy
    Posted Thursday, 18 October 2012 at 1:58 pm | Permalink

    Well Guy, when it comes to who won or lost, it seems to me that you’ve fallen for (or been dragged into) the curse of the deadline. I think I prefer Nate Silver’s take, that it will take a few days to see just what the second debate has done to the polls.
    Meanwhile, it *did* manage to give us the “women in binders” meme and that’s no bad thing.

  • 4
    Liz45
    Posted Thursday, 18 October 2012 at 2:16 pm | Permalink

    This morning a Professor from Wollongong University was interviewed on ABC 97.3 and he added the most important fact - the lies that Romney is premising his statements with! His ‘math’ just don’t add up? He also mentioned that Obama’s support could be higher than posted? Perhaps Obama could’ve challenged him on more of these ‘incorrect policies’? When Romney asserted his ability to employ more people, he should’ve been challenged with his comment, that he likes sacking people? Such compassion for the unemployed? His taxes? His refusal to be accountable re his yearly incomes for the past 10 years or so? Why is that?What does he have to hide? Claims by him of Obama fostering companies in China, but wasn’t made to tell us how much of his investments are in China? Talks with a forked tongue in my view!

    I watched the debate all the way through, and I kept on ‘talking’ to Romney about his so-called plans for the economy. He’s voted against much of what he now asserts while in front of the people. His running mate’s view of how he’ll ‘fix’ the economy has been disputed by people with heaps more knowledge/experience than I have. It’s more of the Republican’s war cry - tax cuts for the rich, and their distorted view of the ‘trickle down’ effect, which is bs, and most middle income and poor people know it - in all capitalist countries, not just the US.

    Look at the so-called ‘remedies’ for countries like Spain, Greece etc. No tough restrictions on the rich, only the poor. Extreme hardship leading to huge increases in the suicide numbers. People starving including children, while the so-called ‘Leaders’ are still being driven around in their Mercedes? None of them look like they’ve had to tighten their belt? No weight loss that I can see? Still living OK in the top paddock? It’s obscene!

    The Republicans will only cause further harm to those on the lower rungs of the economic ladder. Romney has already let us know what his opinion is of anyone on social security etc. Every accusation against Obama re the economy was caused on George W’s watch? The wealthy were allowed to commit crimes in order to feather their own nests. Monies, trillions of them, taken from the ‘ordinary folk’ to bail out the wealthy? THEN, when things started looking up, they were going to engage in the same behaviour/s? They were lucky not to have been lynched - such was the anger among the masses. Wonderful capitalism - bail out the crooks and greedy, and make the ‘little people’ pay. It’s called ‘socialising the losses and privatising the profits’?

    Who started the two wars, that took trillions away from health and education for example. Romney’s pathetic example of his so-called positive attitude to women was a joke - except I wasn’t laughing! One thing extreme right wing politicians have anywhere in the world, is their attitude to women - patronising, churlish, inhibiting and sexist, misogynist even - that is, an ingrained negative view re the rights of women, from the cradle onwards. Romney’s “binder full of women” didn’t impress me. At the same time, he’d vote against ‘Obama Care’ even though it’s the same as what he introduced as Governor? Why is that? To make the misogynist Republicans in Congress etc happy, and to appease the Tea Party followers.

    When they berate the Democratic Party for ‘big government’ it doesn’t include the sexual health and reproductive lives of women. No way! Some even go so far as to insist on women being ‘raped’ by an invasive vaginal ultrasound prior to having a termination. How can anyone who believes in the US Constitution have anything to do with such a gross view!If you believe that women are only chattells, play things, sexual toys even, it’s easy! I shakes me head! Freedom of speech, perhaps? More like ‘free if you agree speech’,(certainly was that way under Bush - I don’t think the PATRIOT Act has been repealed, has it?) the right to bear arms, too right! But the right to control your own personal space - your own body, NO? Hypocrites!

    I don’t like what Obama is doing re foreign affairs, or should I say, war mongering and deliberate assassinations of ‘enemies’, particularly in Pakistan at the moment, but on domestic issues, they run rings around the Republicans re the whole country, certainly poor people and education! Hilary Clinton’s outrage over the attempted assassination of that very brave young woman almost made me puke? Every Tuesday, according to reports, Obama chooses who’ll ‘get it’ that week via drones? The 1.6 million dead in Iraq, and the almost 50,000 in Afghanistan - that’s the first time I’ve even seen a figure re Afghanistan. It’s probably way out - probably a lot more! No grief for them though!

    The ordinary American person doesn’t seem very militant to me. They appear to put up with a lot without any protests or rallies etc. Perhaps we just don’t hear about them! They need to take more interest and start making some demands - such as free and fair elections! That’d be a good place to start! My understanding and from the ‘How Bush Won Florida’ experience is that the political parties/leaders have too much involvement with the electoral process. While that remains, it’s hard to take this seriously!

  • 5
    zut alors
    Posted Thursday, 18 October 2012 at 3:03 pm | Permalink

    Lemme see if I’ve got this right: if you’re a woman but you’re not in a binder Uncle Mitt won’t let you into cabinet. Anyway, I think that’s what he said.

  • 6
    michael r james
    Posted Thursday, 18 October 2012 at 3:20 pm | Permalink

    I suspect there will be no major bounce back to Obama on the basis of his overall win..”

    Well, we in the peanut gallery* might quibble over that statement. Obama is still leading in at least 8 of 12 critical “decider” states (and the rest are too close to call; most are technically too close to call but the electoral math(s) requires Romney to win most of those, and he’s not even clearly winning Virginia …).

    So BO only had to halt the slide which was not some giant momentum as some deluded Republicans convinced themselves of. It was a pretty modest overall improvement but even less in the states that will decide the election. If Obama’s figures even just hold, let alone show some slight improvement, in several of those critical states, Romney is screwed. We have to wait another week for trustworthy poll results but I will be surprised if BO hasn’t held the line.

    Then there is the third debate on MR’s weakest area. It’s not a slam dunk because if BO takes the diffident professor line again (and who could discount that?) he will score an own goal again. But he has already, with Candy’s aid, largely shot down the GOPs nonsense on the Libyan consulate.

    *(but actually I suspect Guy is the one hoovering up those copious free peanuts in all those American bars!)

  • 7
    michael r james
    Posted Thursday, 18 October 2012 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    About the X-boxers and the “get out the vote” campaigns: yes, they still matter hugely. As does the vote early campaign because of the demographics. They young X-boxers will vote Dem if only the sods can be engaged away from their games for a millisecond or two, so it was brilliant to use the X-box in that way. Bill Gates is reluctantly working for BO!

    Every election cycle brings some new advantage to the Dems. Four years of new voters which favour the Dems. Four years of the relentless transformation of certain states by the immigrant, especially Hispanic vote. Florida is already a purple state while even Arizona is trending that way in this election (in crucial Senate elections) and ultimately it will be Texas’ fate too. As discussed way back at the beginning of the convention season the Tea-Party GOP is losing their votes.
    …………………..
    By the way, Guy, you must be seeing the same repeated excerpts from the debate: those same 3 wins by BO which are magnified by the media. The spitting fury of the GOP and Fox brigade about Candy Crowley and the calling the debate a draw even by the conservative media, tells you all you need to know.

  • 8
    CHRISTOPHER DUNNE
    Posted Thursday, 18 October 2012 at 3:34 pm | Permalink

    Intrade money went on Obama immediately after the debate, putting him up to 65% from 60% for the win. (And it’s exactly there as I type.)

    Just sayin’.

  • 9
    SusieQ
    Posted Thursday, 18 October 2012 at 3:46 pm | Permalink

    Its not only ‘women in binders’ it was ‘If we must have women in the workforce….’ - If??? This is also a man, who has Governor of Mass, apparently,voted against allowing rape victims access to free contraception - how can any woman vote for this man?

  • 10
    jimD
    Posted Thursday, 18 October 2012 at 4:39 pm | Permalink

    Don’t agree with you this time, Guy, on the required Obama strategy. Do you really think that that dumb electorate - especially the really dumb swinging voter contingent - is going to be able to follow a counterfactual on the economy? Especially if the first time they hear it is in a one minute grab during a debate. I would agree that the Obama team do need to package up the counterfactual into baby-steps, and then run an ad avalanche on those. Maybe, only maybe, if it is given that intensity of exposure, say ten percent of them might get it. That might be enough. But Obama was right to concentrate on undermining Romney’s credibility in the debate.

  • 11
    Andrea
    Posted Thursday, 18 October 2012 at 4:59 pm | Permalink

    Guy, I think you are just getting too cute with your analysis. I prefer to read those who really know what they’re talking about, like Nate Silver of the New York Times. As a dual American/Australian citizen who lives half the year in Sydney, half in Massachusetts, I find Australian coverage of the US elections pretty pathetic.

  • 12
    zut alors
    Posted Thursday, 18 October 2012 at 5:01 pm | Permalink

    Predictably, Jon Stewart’s critique of the debate was most amusing. Go online and have a laugh.

  • 13
    Posted Thursday, 18 October 2012 at 5:30 pm | Permalink

    stay off the juice GR - this world needs you in good shape for the US elections, say like Cleaver Green on a good day. Irredeemable but very very good.

  • 14
    Posted Thursday, 18 October 2012 at 5:46 pm | Permalink

    on the binders thing, one presumes after that John Edwards inspired movie Ides of March, that Mitt is shown binders of resumes and photos of pneumatic executive staff rather than be distracted with personal interviews, not to imply anything but you can’t be too careful with the political career and all. As the movie script says ‘you can start a war … but you can’t &%#$@ the interns’.

  • 15
    Kevin Herbert
    Posted Thursday, 18 October 2012 at 7:50 pm | Permalink

    Liz 45:

    The United States of America in its illegal, undeclared war against Vietnam:
    - murdered more than 3 million civilians
    -dropped more bombs on this relatively small country than were dropped in ther whole of the European theatre in WW2
    -caused generational, widespread birth defects due to its reckless use of chemical defoliants
    -reneged on the $8 billion reparations it faithfully agreed to pay at the Paris Peaqce Conference to end the war
    -kept Vietnam out of the IMF developmental funding cycle until the 1990’s to punish it for humiliating the US armed forces

    The GR8 Satan is an evil empire has been controlled by the MIC since 1945, and over the past 25 years, a foreign government’s DC lobby group.

    And now, both Obama & Romney, are war mongering against Iran, to feed the MIC monster that President Eisenhower warned the US citizenry about in 1960.

    And to think that this DC assembly of human scum is our principal ally.

  • 16
    AR
    Posted Thursday, 18 October 2012 at 8:54 pm | Permalink

    Whiney adlosecent Vs the programmed Plutocrat. I must agree with Rundle, who is as desperate a partisan as I am disdainful, that because BO didn’t wipe the floor and piss on the remants to wash them away, then he lost and the Mittbot blanded & bullshitted & smarmed through, to what passes for the consciousness of the great moronic masses.

  • 17
    MJPC
    Posted Friday, 19 October 2012 at 8:00 am | Permalink

    Liz45, thank you for your analysis of where Obama should have attacked, but unfortunately didn’t. Who knows what his ideas were in not addressing Romney’s lack of compassion and hypocracy.
    KH, all valid points although I don’t believe Obama want’s his government involved in another disaster in the Middle East, that an attack on Iran would be. Of course, if Romney and his lunatic right get in, I am certain he will stand by their ernstwhile ally Israel and launch strikes, which will be another unmitigated disaster for the whole world.
    Agreed, the MIC has to be fed. All those aircraft carriers (an offensive weapons system) have to be employed somewhere.

  • 18
    mary singh
    Posted Friday, 19 October 2012 at 9:19 am | Permalink

    Obama will lose the Election because he is a bad President. President Charvez of Venezuela said that he would vote Obamas way if he was a American citizen.Obama has failed the American people with His Socialistic /Dictatorship style of Goverment .It does not sit well with them.He has trounced all over The Constitution with his executive orders.Obamas dismal jobs record on has left millions of of Americans struggling to find work.Obama lied to the American people about the Bengazi attack.Obama is a total failure at being Presidential and needs to go…Obamas failure on Foreign Policy has embolden our Enemys. The whole middle East is ablaze while he contines to play golf or partys with the Hollywood Socialites.

  • 19
    Liz45
    Posted Friday, 19 October 2012 at 3:48 pm | Permalink

    @Kevin Hubert - The US still hasn’t admitted to using Agent Orange let alone taking responsibility for the unbelievable death and misery caused by this substance. Shameful.

    I had high hopes prior to Obama’s election but, like many, it was business as usual - worse even! I certainly won’t get up to watch his inauguration if he’s re-elected.

    My understanding of the whole bs against Iran (not that I’m a supporter, I just don’t like the hysteria and hypocrisy of the US etc) started over a speech that the President gave where he allegedly said that Israel should be wiped off the map. I’ve read an article where the full interpretation of that speech was translated, and he didn’t say that at all. What he did was quote someone else who’d said something similar - but not that autocratic or ‘severe’?

    It’s suited the West ever since to go along with the claims that he allegedly made in his speech. Even Bob Carr and others have alluded to this assertion, which is awful, but he didn’t say it! I’m sure the article could be found if people have the desire to. I don’t know why the President of Iran hasn’t put the record straight. I don’t like him, I don’t like his autocratic ways etc, attitudes to women, but he’s no worse than Putin, or many other dictators who we suck up to - Saudi Arabia and the like!

    I read a really good book called ‘American Torture’ written by an American called, Michael??? which discusses the US’s history of using torture from after WW2 until Hicks, Habib and so on. Most revealing. It states that at least 30,000 Vietnamese were murdered by the CIA and military during the Vietnam War - that’s apart from the several million who died. It also gives an insight into the US use of same in Central America and other places that we are aware of. Why the US has the gall to boast of their ‘freedom and democracy’ values is beyond me - they should be cowering with shame!

    @mary singh - What a load of rubbish! Who are our ‘enemys’ (sic)? The word you’re looking for is ‘enemies’? Obama a “Socialist/Dictatorship”? Are you serious? Hugo Chavez has just been re-elected by 55% of the population. Many Western leaders would love that to boast about. When it comes to the economy, Obama inherited a basket case, all done by the Bush Administration. When it comes to trouncing the Constitution, you can’t go past George W? Remember the PATRIOT Act? I suggest you watch, Unconstitutional’The War against Civil Liberties’ and ‘How Bush Won Florida’? Both are on the net at http://www.freedocumentaries.org

    Then you could have a look at the environmental protections etc that Chaney instigated that allowed Coal Seam Gas companies to do untold damage, and it’s still going on. The two illegal wars started by Bush And Co? Guantanamo Bay; Abu Graib; the detention of children and the torture of same in both Iraq and Afghanistan!

    President Chavez, in complete contradiction to the dictatorial attitudes/behaviours of the ‘world’s biggest democracy’ has turned the economy around; enabled the poor to get an education; women seeing a doctor to care for them during their pregnancy; making oil companies and others pay their back taxes or kicked them out; is providing housing for the low income people (gradually - takes time); providing supermarkets for the lowest income people at a reduced cost; WITH the people, the Constitution has been re-written and then after several progressive ballots, the people voted overwhelmingly to accept the final draft. Women in their 70’s going to Uni? Community meetings; some businesses taken over and operated by the workers in a free, democratic and productive manner - many are doing well! And the list goes on!

    Incidentally, unlike the US, Venezuela has had each election overseen by reputable people from other countries, and it’s been confirmed, that the elections were free and fair! Jimmy Carter oversaw these elections a few times!

    I think the Middle East is “ablaze” because after decades of oppression (overseen and endorsed by past US Presidents, not just the current one) the people said “enough”? Both the US, Britain were the countries that sold weapons to dictators who they endorsed. The US has sold/given weapons to Israel to use against the Palestinians for decades. It’s the past US presidents who propped up the awful cruelty of past despotic Presidents of Middle Eastern countries - I include Iraq in this as well. In fact, both George W and Clinton entertained the Taliban prior to them being ‘out of favour’? Similar to their relationship with Saddam Hussein! Lots of US and British government people received lots of pressies from Saddam over the years! We averted our gaze because it suited the ‘big picture’? Just as we do the same in many African countries. As long as the US can remove their resources, they don’t mind how the citizens suffer! Un-important to the ‘national interest’?

  • 20
    Kevin Herbert
    Posted Friday, 19 October 2012 at 4:47 pm | Permalink

    Liz 45:

    Here’s the interview with the Israeli deputy PM who admits that President Ahmadinejad has never said that Israel should be wiped off the map:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZmffEQmKr8&feature=bf_next&list=PL5B91347A299567AA

    Also, I have the following post where it is proved that Ahmadinejad has never denied the Holocaust:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykd-syzZ4ZY

    DFAT don’t know these facts of course..cos the US State Department hasn’t mentioned it to them.

    You won’t ber surpised to know that when I send this irrfutable evidence to the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies, Albert Dadon, Kevin Rudd & Julia Gillard..I don’t get a response.

  • 21
    Liz45
    Posted Friday, 19 October 2012 at 11:45 pm | Permalink

    @Kevin Herbert - Thank you Kevin. I’ll look at these tomorrow - too late now! I appreciate this. And I agree with you about not getting a response - shame on them! There’s plenty of REAL aspects of the Iranian leadership, human rights issues etc to be concerned about, why fabricate such accusations that aren’t true?

    Lateline tonight had an interview with Israeli experienced ex intelligence people (two) and they’re not happy with the Israeli govt’s ‘beefing up the danger of Iran’? Even members of his own govt aren’t happy. Interesting development?

  • 22
    Liz45
    Posted Friday, 19 October 2012 at 11:45 pm | Permalink

    G’night!

  • 23
    Liz45
    Posted Thursday, 25 October 2012 at 5:43 pm | Permalink

    @Kevin - Just got around to watching these posts. thanks again! Most enlightening! Pity he doesn’t speak English - it would be better, but they’re good interviews aren’t they?Why are our journalists so lazy as to not investigate these assertions themselves? Like how they just follow US on Hugo Chavez and his recent election as President! By 55% of the vote! Our pollies would only dream of such a record! The people have gone to the polls, I think 10 times? in 12 or so years? And yet msm keeps on attacking Chavez for his so-called autocratic ways? Most frustrating indeed! I wish I could speak Spanish (get 3 of my grandkids to teach me?)and had the money, I’d have gone to Venezuela just to witness the huge rallies, the excitement and all the good things that country has achieved since Chavez was elected President! Amazing accomplishments - WITH the people! They’ve been involved all the way - from re-writing their Constitution to cutting poverty by huge amounts; growth in their economy, much better than ours for instance! Still more to do, but from accounts of Aussies who’ve been there, it’s an inspiration to see it in action! I wish I could go! Just once would be good!

    Just one stat! Over 200,000 dwellings have been built since Chavez won that first election. And there’s more to come! Imagine if we had a govt that placed such emphasis on the homeless!

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...