tip off

Christians won’t vote for atheist leaders: research

It’s politics, for God’s sake, but how much does politicians’ religiosity actually sway the Christian voter bloc? Researcher Grant Power investigates.

Tony Abbott is a Christian. Did you know that? Perhaps it slipped your notice when he condemned boat people as “un-Christian” for using the back door, or when he told the Australian Christian Lobby that “our civilisation is inconceivable without the influence of Christian faith”, or insisted that Bible classes in schools should be compulsory.

Abbott isn’t shy about his faith. And it’s not just the conservative side of politics playing the game — when Kevin Rudd was prime minister he chased votes at the ACL. Even the self-proclaimed atheist Julia Gillard won’t challenge the controversial School Chaplaincy Program.

But does it work? Do Christians vote for Christians?

Christian voters represent a significant voting bloc. The 2011 Australian Census data indicated that 61.1% of Australians identify as Christian (although this number includes people under the voting age and doesn’t differentiate between those that are regular church-goers and those that are rare attendees — and even those who identify by their religion in the census only).

In 2011, for my honours thesis, I surveyed 1109 Australian Christians to find out how they vote — and, more specifically, how the religiosity of Australia’s political leaders affects Christians’ voting intentions.

The two most important factors influencing voting intentions were not religious —  party policies and the political party were key. That is no real surprise — previous research has shown that party policies and the political party are significant factors affecting the voting intentions of the general population.

But the political party leader is the third most important factor, and is considered an important factor that influences Christians’ voting intention. This is consistent with the personalisation of Australian politics and the increasing profile of political party leaders. Think Rudd in the lead-up to the 2007 election. Or nowadays Abbott.

The religion of political party leaders is known by many in the Australian public. Political leaders regularly discuss their own religiosity within public and political discourse; John Howard and Peter Costello highlighted their Christianity to the Hillsong congregation whilst Rudd explained the ins-and-outs of his religion in The Monthly. This would suggest that the religiosity of political party leaders might be an important factor affecting the voting intention of Christians.

And the survey showed that Christians are indeed religiocentric — they possess in-group favouritism for Christian political leaders as well as a comparative bias against non-religious and non-Christian political party leaders (see graph below). The agnostics and atheists fare worst — Christians would be least inclined to support atheist and agnostic political party leaders.

This causes a problem for confirmed atheist Gillard. Christians are more inclined to vote for Abbott over Gillard. In fact, the research even suggests that Christians would be more inclined to vote for a non-Christian religious political party leader — even a Muslim, for example — than an atheist. Gillard’s religious beliefs, or lack thereof, don’t do her any favours in winning the Christian vote.

And it looks like Abbott has the right idea in spruiking his faith around the country — it turns out that religiously active and involved Christian political party leaders have greater support than nominally religious Christian political party leaders. When considering the Christian vote, maybe Abbott is a better choice than Malcolm Turnbull.

So the order of preferred leader for Christians is: active Christian leader best, nominal Christian OK, active non-Christian tolerable, and atheists at the bottom of the heap. There is clear in-group favouritism towards Christian political party leaders and an out-group bias against non-Christian and (especially) non-religious leaders.

If the polls stay at their current levels, this probably won’t be enough of a factor to make any difference to the outcome of the next election. But if the race tightens up a bit, then the Christian vote could become vitally important in deciding who is the next prime minister of Australia.

There’s another way to look at these findings — as a wake-up call to Australian Christian communities and their leadership. The research shows that Christians are prejudiced against non-Christian and non-religious political party leaders. And, in this, their voting decisions are being influenced by factors that don’t actually have much to do with their leadership ability.

*Grant Power conducted this research for his honours thesis at the University of Queensland, which he completed in 2011

17
  • 1
    Holden Back
    Posted Tuesday, 9 October 2012 at 11:50 am | Permalink

    Did you look at any lingering sectarian suspicions influencing voters? There is still some lingering doubt in the US evangelicals will vote for a Mormon presidential candidate.

  • 2
    Rosemary Stanton
    Posted Tuesday, 9 October 2012 at 1:54 pm | Permalink

    Grant
    Your graph needs to show confidence intervals to have much relevance.

  • 3
    Mark Duffett
    Posted Tuesday, 9 October 2012 at 2:21 pm | Permalink

    It’d be interesting to see research looking the other way: With atheism increasingly strident these days, are atheists less likely to vote for Christian leaders? I venture to suggest, with no evidence whatsoever, that there would be no major positive bias of atheists towards non-religious leaders, but there might well be a substantial negative bias against religious ones.

  • 4
    SusieQ
    Posted Tuesday, 9 October 2012 at 2:46 pm | Permalink

    As an atheist, I find the final paragraph most interesting in this story.
    In terms of voting, unless someone is putting forward an overtly religious set of policies, then their religion is not the primary thing I am concerned about. I am concerned about policies and whether a particular party meets my expectations. Lets face it, political parties in Australia generally have a range of religious beliefs within them - I bet there are a few athiests amongst the Liberal party, for example. If Christians want to be so narrow-minded, then thats their problem.

  • 5
    Michael Bell
    Posted Tuesday, 9 October 2012 at 3:22 pm | Permalink

    The results have no meaning beyond comparing two groups of Christians: nothing can be said about how these voter preferences compare to the preferences of the population as a whole, and there is no information about the relative importance of the leaders’ religiosity compared to other factors.

    The article also perpetuates the myth that the Australian Christian Lobby is representative of Australian Christians. It most definitely is not.

  • 6
    mikeb
    Posted Tuesday, 9 October 2012 at 3:45 pm | Permalink

    As a Christian I am only interested in comparing the actions of politicians rather than what they profess to believe. Abbott might be a professed Christian but some of his actions are a long way from what Jesus would encourage. Judge people on what they do - not on what they say.

  • 7
    The Old Bill
    Posted Tuesday, 9 October 2012 at 4:33 pm | Permalink

    I distrust anyone who needs to talk to an imaginary friend before making a decision.
    I suppose that means I can’t vote for Tony either.

  • 8
    soilmates
    Posted Tuesday, 9 October 2012 at 4:37 pm | Permalink

    Grant, would like to have seen a disclosure on your own religious position, might have had an influence (subliminal, of course)on your interpretations.

  • 9
    David Hand
    Posted Tuesday, 9 October 2012 at 4:48 pm | Permalink

    I think Christian political activism is a symptom of its decline, a sort of rearguard action as it retreats from a place of dominance. I make this point with regard to centuries. 100 years ago, it was unthinkable for leaders in society not to be Christian. You didn’t have christian political movements because all mainstream political movements were Christian and communism was consigned to the fringe because of its atheism .

    Australia is now firmly post-christian where most people identify as christian for traditional and family reasons. This is why any overt christian political activism by Tony Abbott would be electoral death and why he won’t go there.

  • 10
    CML
    Posted Tuesday, 9 October 2012 at 5:04 pm | Permalink

    Would someone like to tell these “fairies at the bottom of the garden” Christian lot, that this is a SECULAR country, with a SECULAR constitution? They can act out their fantasies OUTSIDE of government, and leave the rest of us in peace!!!!!
    No religion should have an influence on the government of this country. Surely there is an argument to be made that such interference is unconstitional?
    The last time these Christians influenced government in a big way we got funding for religious and so-called independent schools. Now all religious types are attached to the “funding” tube of the Feds. That worked out well, NOT!

  • 11
    Mark Duffett
    Posted Tuesday, 9 October 2012 at 5:47 pm | Permalink

    A SECULAR constitution’, really, CML? How does that square with “humbly relying on the blessing of Almighty God” in its very first sentence?

    See also David Hand, who is spot on re historic context.

    But thanks for being evidence for my contention.

  • 12
    Martin Turner
    Posted Tuesday, 9 October 2012 at 6:11 pm | Permalink

    Old Bill, that’s Old Hat.

  • 13
    Pedantic, Balwyn
    Posted Tuesday, 9 October 2012 at 6:49 pm | Permalink

    Most of the Catholics I know reckon Tony is a very poor example of a Christian and will vote for Ms Gillard. Atheist or not she demonstrates a more Christian attitude towards all voters, men and women!

  • 14
    Harper Colin
    Posted Tuesday, 9 October 2012 at 7:38 pm | Permalink

    I would vote for any politician who represents the interests of their electorate and not the interests of their minders, the Corporatocracy better known as the Illu Minati.

  • 15
    Matt Hardin
    Posted Wednesday, 10 October 2012 at 1:47 pm | Permalink

    One aspect unrelated to the actual content of this piece is the fact that an honours student is sharing his research with a broader audience. Fantastic! There should be more of it! Congratulations Grant.

    Is there a link to your whole thesis? It might help answer some of the questions being raised here.

  • 16
    Jeremy Apps
    Posted Wednesday, 10 October 2012 at 4:08 pm | Permalink

    I echo Mark Duffett’s thoughts.

    On a side note, I would argue against the generally held fallacy that Christian attitudes somehow equate with moral ones.

  • 17
    Aaron F
    Posted Friday, 12 October 2012 at 5:34 pm | Permalink

    This agrees with the suspicion I have had for some time, based on what religious colleagues say. Vote for the more Christian leader / party. Usually the conservative party, which is pro wealthy at the expensive of the poor, more likely to be pro-capital punishment, and don’t believe in universal healthcare (Medicare), just like Jesus would have been.

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...