tip off

The case to make donations to non-profit media tax deductible

A prominent journalism lobby group has asked the Gillard government to let “mum and dad” investors and corporate donors write off their donations to fledgling non-profit media organisations.

The Public Interest Journalism Foundation — an independent body whose members include several notable j-school academics — wrote to Communications Minister Stephen Conroy last week “calling for mechanisms to promote philanthropic support for public interest journalism, such as tax deductibility for not-for-profit media organisations or for journalistic investigations”.

The suggestion formed a key suggestion of the recent Finkelstein report into the media, that stated philanthropists and smaller donors should be able to shell out funds for fresh initiatives with the encouragement of the tax man.

A foundation spokesperson, Monash University lecturer and former Age investigative legend Bill Birnbauer, says the focus needs to be shifted away from saving newspapers towards subsidised investments in public interest journalism centres — 75 of which have popped up with great success in the United States.

We are in a time of incredible transition in the media and what is needed now is a recognition that meeting the information needs of communities is no longer the sole responsibility of newspapers,” he said. “The problem we face needs to be re-framed from one of ‘saving’ newspapers to finding new ways of preserving the core of quality journalism on a variety of digital platforms.”

Birnbauer told Crikey that the resulting institutions “should be treated like museums and galleries … given the lack of diversity in Australia it might prompt more voices and more outlets to be formed”.

In the US, initiatives like ProPublica have successfully emerged to conduct time-consuming, resource-heavy investigations increasingly shirked by what is left of the dead tree press. The stories — like the 2009 Pulitzer Prize-winner on the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina  — can then be syndicated across the mainstream media.

Another corking example is the California Watch website, which recently completed a multimedia-laden investigation into earthquake-prone schools that was picked up by a number of established west coast mastheads.

Birnbauer says the point is not to compete with the mainstream media, but to work with it. He says a recent example of a philanthropist-funded online venture, The Global Mail, backed by entrepreneur Graeme Wood, has failed in its mission to become a local ProPublica because of its lack of penetration and depth.

They are similar in that one rich guy is funding them but they’re completely different in what they’re producing,” he said.

Despite Australia’s population deficit, the potential for a boom in non-profit journalism could be engineered with the right tax laws.

The fact that there are now about 75 investigative non-profit reporting centres in the US is due to the fact that donations to them are tax deductible,” Birnbauer said. “Any reporting organisation created under this model in Australia would have to operate on a non-profit basis in order to attract tax deductibility. If successful, a commercial model could eventuate in future.”

While grassroots supporters may be willing to contribute micro-amounts to such a service, entrepreneurs may still be reluctant to stump up the necessary cash — Australia has one of the most disappointing per capita rates of philanthropic donation in the developed world.

Wood, a BRW Rich Lister, is an outlier in having committed $3 million a year for five years to The Global Mail, without any assistance from the taxpayer.

The Public Interest Journalism Foundation is hoping to meet with Conroy to discuss the proposal in coming months.

12
  • 1
    paddy
    Posted Wednesday, 11 July 2012 at 2:01 pm | Permalink

    Hmm…So when Gina Reinhart makes a donation to New Matilda, (or some other worthy publication) it’ll be tax deductible. Sounds like a plan!

  • 2
    Michael de Angelos
    Posted Wednesday, 11 July 2012 at 2:02 pm | Permalink

    An excellent idea and the sad fall of the print newspapers in the USA which was probably the finest media in the world is matched by the rise of so many superb on-line outlets.

    The Global Mail really deserves great success. As a luddite even I have finally managed it’s odd side to side style and actually like it.

  • 3
    Mike Smith
    Posted Wednesday, 11 July 2012 at 2:23 pm | Permalink

    Why stop at media organisations? Worthy enough they are, but there’s other worthy areas for non-profits that could benefit from the same treatment.

  • 4
    Bryannai Baillieu
    Posted Wednesday, 11 July 2012 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

    I’m not sure it’s such a good idea - the tax deductibility sounds like a sop to keep a few journalists quiet rather than a plan to grow an industry. I really can’t see Mum & Dad investors putting money into media when there is always property to buy and get a nice tax break via negative gearing.
    I can see a few wealthy individuals funding their pet nutbags - “The Daily Bolter” anyone?
    And us paying them to do it via tax breaks.

    It also means that the government can yet again sidestep the real issues - foreign ownership (Murdoch) and the overall lack of competition in the market. These are issues which affect a large number of industries and one way Labor could differentiate themselves from the Noalition is to grow some t-ts and address the problem.

  • 5
    Phaser Norton
    Posted Wednesday, 11 July 2012 at 4:56 pm | Permalink

    It is sad enough that these people have taxpayer-funded jobs. And it is no surprise that they want more tax benefits for their soap boxes. Just look at the insipid, ineffectual media in countries where it’s government funded. Like France.
    It’s waste past time for everyone to realise that quality work needs to be supported by people willing to pay. It works for plenty of products. And it should work perfectly well for news. Every other argument is a cover for saying that people want to be paid for their opinion.

  • 6
    Mike Smith
    Posted Wednesday, 11 July 2012 at 5:02 pm | Permalink

    <resists urge to feed trolls>

  • 7
    Captain Planet
    Posted Wednesday, 11 July 2012 at 11:29 pm | Permalink

    I think this is one of the most dangerous ideas I’ve heard in a while.

    Consider the future, 5 years from now….

    Gina Reinhart and Twiggy Forrest have joined forces with BHPBilliton, Xstrata and Rio Tinto. They collectively funnel several hundred billion dollars a year into “not for profit” media organisations which, funnily enough, promulgate their views and manipulate public opinion to support their corporate agendas. He who pays the piper, calls the tune. … meanwhile the Australian Taxpayer is generously allowing this blatant expenditure on propoganda to be considered a tax deduction, thus forgoing many tens of billions of dollars of tax revenue.

    Bad Idea.

  • 8
    Mike Smith
    Posted Thursday, 12 July 2012 at 12:53 am | Permalink

    Hence my earlier suggestion about not stopping at media organisations. I was hoping that opening the argument to any non-profits[1] would show the dangers.

    [1] A good example would be car makers, a typical non-profit organisation.

  • 9
    JamesH
    Posted Thursday, 12 July 2012 at 10:37 am | Permalink

    Indeed Mike Smith - another example, judging from the amount of tax it pays, Fortescue Mining has never made a profit, and the same could be said of many multinationals with branch offices here…

  • 10
    Suzanne Blake
    Posted Thursday, 12 July 2012 at 11:11 am | Permalink

    No way, then we will have the Green paper, with Communist rants

  • 11
    Gocomsys
    Posted Thursday, 12 July 2012 at 1:03 pm | Permalink

    CAPTAIN PLANET Posted Wednesday, 11 July 2012 at 11:29 pm
    Agree.

    Warning: We are currently facing a dangerous concerted effort to undermine our democracy.

    At present the ALP (Alternative Liberal Party) supported by the Greens and the Independents have workable policies, the LNP does not.
    Changing current party leaders does NOT change this fact.
    Re-installing (mea culpa) Rudd and (fake email) Turnbull will NOT change the fundamentals.
    Politics is not a beauty contest. It is about policies NOT personalities.

    The MSM doesn’t get it. They have been manipulating public opinion for too long. A public interest test needs to be implemented. See also this article: (use copy and paste) independentaustralia.net/2012/philosophy/democracy/media-bosses-must-stop-meddling-in-our-democracy/

    NB. Troll comments duly ignored.

  • 12
    Owen Gary
    Posted Thursday, 12 July 2012 at 1:38 pm | Permalink

    Another “wooden horse of Troy” with a belly full of worms.
    You can see where this is heading, more subjugation of the masses by the ultra rich & a tax break at the end of it, where is our society heading???

Womens Agenda

loading...

Leading Company

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...