tip off

The minister, the speech and the troubled arts department

Queensland Arts Minister Ros Bates has fired her top bureaucrat, deputy director general Shane Rowlands, blaming her for a speech she plagiarised from a Labor opponent. But Bates was in the chamber when the speech she copied was first read out.

Rowlands has taken the fall for a speech that Bates delivered to Queensland Parliament on May 17, in which she recycled whole paragraphs of a speech from the former Labor arts minister Rachel Nolan.

The speech was introducing a bill, the Queensland Art Gallery Amendment Bill. But while the content of the bill was dull enough (it was an administrative amendment which dealt with the Queensland Art Gallery’s board of trustees), the speech accompanying it has now played a role in the downfall of the head of Arts Queensland. Bates gave the speech after apparently relying on advice from the department, which, logically enough, presented her with the same advice it had presented to Nolan in November.

I am pleased to introduce a bill which enables the board to establish a committee to carry on the crucial activities of the foundation for the benefit of the community,” Nolan said on November 29. “The foundation was originally formed in 1979 for the purpose of assisting the board to maintain, improve and develop the state collection of works of art and the facilities and operations of the Queensland Art Gallery.”

On May 17, Bates got to her feet and said “this bill enables the Art Gallery board of trustees to establish a committee to carry on the crucial activities of the foundation for the benefit of the community. The foundation was originally formed in 1979 for the purpose of assisting the board to maintain, improve and develop the state collection of works of art and the facilities and operations of the Queensland Art Gallery.” And so on.

As is immediately apparent on a comparison of the Hansards, Bates and her staff simply failed to vet the speech presented to her.

Bates blamed the department. The day after the embarrassing gaffe came to light in local newspapers, Rowlands was dismissed.

In Parliament this week, Bates has claimed the sacking was initiated by Rowlands’ immediate superior, the director general of the Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts, Philip Reed. But what exactly was Rowlands sacked for? Providing the minister with advice over a bill is the job of the department. Given that the bill was identical to the one presented by Labor, it makes sense that the advice was also the same. It’s hardly the department’s fault if the minister reads out that advice and is embarrassed by the consequences.

Of course, the more cynical might observe that ministerial embarrassment is always the department’s fault. But the Westminster system is not supposed to work like that: it is in fact the minister who is meant to be accountable to Parliament. When the new cabinet was sworn in at the beginning of April, Premier Campbell Newman promised the return of “proper Westminster accountability … to Queensland”.

No matter: Rowlands is gone.

Opposition arts spokeswoman Jackie Trad is fresh to Parliament after winning Anna Bligh’s old seat of South Brisbane. “The fact that this has happen the day after a story broke about the minister plagiarising a speech delivered by the former Labor arts minister is deeply concerning,” she wrote in an email. “If the public servant has been sacked for this reason then what this amounts to is a monumental dummy spit from a Minister who is clearly out of her depth.”

Labor’s Trad points out that Bates was in the chamber in November when Nolan read out the speech, and should have remembered. “Less than six months ago Ros Bates sat in the Parliament while the former Labor minister delivered this speech and introduced the original bill,” Trad writes. “Ros Bates as a minister is provided with significant tax-payer funded resources including staff at her beck and call. She is responsible for ensuring that her speeches in Parliament contain her vision, her priorities and her own words.

The public service is responsible for providing factually correct information, not political speeches.”

Rowlands, the deputy director general, was well-regarded in arts circles and had a background as a policy maker, academic and writer. Arts Queensland’s website doesn’t appear to have caught up with the news either: as of this morning, you could still see Rowlands’ biography on Arts Queensland’s website. She is believed to be considering appealing the decision.

A source inside Arts Queensland told Crikey that Rowlands was a popular figure inside the department and that staff were “shocked and dismayed” by the dismissal. Crikey understands there is considerable turnover in the ranks of the department: a number of Labor-sympathising staff have already quit, and all temporary contracts are not being renewed.

We get to have cake every week,” the source said, owing to the number of staff departing.

Crikey approached Ros Bates and Phillip Reed for comment, but so far none has been received.

15
  • 1
    ithurtstosneeze
    Posted Friday, 1 June 2012 at 12:51 pm | Permalink

    Pretty cruel outcome for what’s otherwise a storm in the china stemming from a ‘gotcha’ stunt.

    The speech was materially identical. So what?

    The bill was a routine procedural thing aimed at clearing away some quango’s administrative cobwebs, not a reintroduction of capital punishment. It didn’t warrant a statement of ‘vision’ by way of introduction, but a bare outline of facts, which is what it got.

    Mild shame the speech was same as the predecessor’s, but short of reframing in the passive voice, swapping in some synonyms, or presenting it via improv theatre, it really couldn’t - and didn’t need to - read any differently.

    You’d hope the briefing officers made it abundantly clear the accompanying speaking notes were recycled. The Minister could then have prefaced her comments accordingly. So someone’s dropped the ball, but even still, on the Richter scale of embarrassment, it’s pretty mild - akin to a muffled burp in polite company, when by the fallout you’d think she’d gone in to the House and, egged on by the Department, reprised this dude:
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/mar/17/kony-2012-meltdown-stress-wife

    The better response surely would have been to blow off the original reportage (which the Minister at least was reported as having done), not reach for the pitchforks.

  • 2
    Hackett Terry
    Posted Friday, 1 June 2012 at 1:15 pm | Permalink

    Look, the Newman Government was elected with such a majority the people of Queensland have given it carte blanche to do what ever it wants.. so stop complaining…… majority , and this case an almost 100% majority rule…. until the people of Queensland elect another party .. if ever ha ha ha … just shut up all you wingers…

  • 3
    Andrew Chalmers
    Posted Friday, 1 June 2012 at 1:23 pm | Permalink

    Oh poor Bates. Leave the poor woman alone. She’s only been in the job a few months and her teen-ankle staffers probably don’t know that they need to write the speeches for the minister yet.

    God knows the advisor to the (relatively) new NSW arts minister still has training wheels on. It takes time to know how to play with the big kids.

  • 4
    arnold ziffel
    Posted Friday, 1 June 2012 at 1:31 pm | Permalink

    It’s laughable that they just recycled the same text.
    In NSW government we were dealing with new Ministers last year, and it didn’t take much effort to amend things here and there.

  • 5
    PK93
    Posted Friday, 1 June 2012 at 2:15 pm | Permalink

    Hackett Terry, are you parody or self-parody?

  • 6
    peter w
    Posted Friday, 1 June 2012 at 3:29 pm | Permalink

    well in the Queensland Public Service we can look forward to what Newman did to the Brisbane City Council, increasing ordinary hours from 36 1/4 to 38 hours , dropping Super payments from 12% to 9% , Newman will work to gut the Public Service and sell it off to private interests. Also the selling of Govt Buildings to private interests and renting back the floor space just does not work or add up for that mattter, it just goes to show Newman is like the rest of them , a liar , and caught out telling them , Queensland deserves what it gets

  • 7
    Lord Barry Bonkton
    Posted Friday, 1 June 2012 at 6:50 pm | Permalink

    We in Qld want a new election before they sell everything and break any more promises Mr New-liar and we want it Now !

  • 8
    Clements Simon
    Posted Friday, 1 June 2012 at 7:39 pm | Permalink

    So Ros Bates is incompetent. At least she is known for something now that will not be forgotten,
    gross incompetence.

  • 9
    John64
    Posted Friday, 1 June 2012 at 8:58 pm | Permalink

    I want some cake.

  • 10
    Liamj
    Posted Friday, 1 June 2012 at 10:13 pm | Permalink

    What precious flowers they must grow in Qld LNP, that a mildly ironic accident should result in an unjust sacking rather than a rueful chuckle at their own slipup.

  • 11
    Godfrey Dennis
    Posted Friday, 1 June 2012 at 10:33 pm | Permalink

    As a seasoned ministerial speechwriter, including at one stage for a Queensland Government department, I can tell you that all departmental line areas have standard wording drawn from policy statements. The speechwriter, who is not an expert in every aspect of departmental policy, often has to rely on the information provided by these line areas. At the risk of making the minister autonomically repetitive, it is undesirable to follow such identical wording from speech to speech. The art is to reflect the facts to sound like a speech and not merely a mouthing of standard formulae. More than undesirable, it is a big mistake to cut and paste copy between ministers, more particularly in relation to opposing political parties. I do not know if the former Deputy Director-General Shane Rowlands is, or is not, experienced as a speechwriter, but generally speaking in the public sector it is a critical error to rely on administrators and policy gurus to write speeches. They tend to cut and paste. They want to feel safe from any challenge. As in all pursuits, including ministerial speechwriting, one has to learn to be a high-wire walker!

  • 12
    Posted Saturday, 2 June 2012 at 4:18 pm | Permalink

    In my experience it is routine for the department to prepare ‘speech notes’ to the minister, or more precisely, to the minister’s office. As Godfrey writes, departmental briefs tend to be cut and paste and ‘boilerplate’ - very safe drafting. So for a minister to read out ‘speech notes’ is unwise. But isn’t also plagiarism? Wasn’t the minister claiming authorship of material that they didn’t write?

  • 13
    bluepoppy
    Posted Saturday, 2 June 2012 at 6:23 pm | Permalink

    “The public service is responsible for providing factually correct information, not political speeches.”

    Ha Ha Ha. Let me just pick myself up from the floor from laughing. When did that happen?

    This is scapegoatism of the first degree.

  • 14
    SBH
    Posted Sunday, 3 June 2012 at 9:00 pm | Permalink

    Gavin, that’s now changed in Victoria where public servants write the whole speech and revisions, did one last week. But then again Victoria’s not a great example as Ted hasn’t even got around to writing enabling letters for ministers yet.

  • 15
    Posted Sunday, 3 June 2012 at 9:05 pm | Permalink

    Thanx SBH

    I still think that’s plagiarism unless your authorship was acknowledged.

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...