<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook buys Instagram&#8217;s buzz in lead-up to share float</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/04/10/facebook-buys-instagram/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/04/10/facebook-buys-instagram/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:44:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/04/10/facebook-buys-instagram/comment-page-1/#comment-193219</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 04:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=284375#comment-193219</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a lot to pay for buzz.

I think Techcruch has the real reason - negate a competitor who has been growing extremely fast and threatening one of Facebook&#039;s major drawcards..photo sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a lot to pay for buzz.</p>
<p>I think Techcruch has the real reason - negate a competitor who has been growing extremely fast and threatening one of Facebook&#8217;s major drawcards..photo sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 489/498 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2013-05-21 18:03:06 -->