Crikey



Rundle: the Brooks go to jail, and Murdoch’s problems get worse

Six people, including former News International head Rebekah Brooks, have been arrested in Britain, on a variety of charges arising from the News International phone-hacking scandal. Brooks is charged with “attempting to pervert the course of justice”.

Brooks is already on bail having been charged with “suspicion of conspiring to intercept communications and on suspicion of corruption allegations” in July last year. The arrests yesterday are more serious — “perversion of the course of justice’ is a life-sentence crime.

The arrests were made early Tuesday morning, and hit the morning radio and TV news — despite no names being mentioned, news of a “43-year-old woman from Oxfordshire” made it instantly clear who it was to millions following the case with glee.

Also arrested was Brooks’ husband, Charlie, a racehorse trainer, and shires Hooray Henry, who, in his column in the Telegraph (yes, of course he has a column in the Telegraph), remarked that “the happiest moment of my year is about three hours before the first race at Cheltenham on Tuesday queuing … for my … first pint of Guinness of the meeting” … Yeah, not so much this year. This morning he was in chokey, trying to work out whether he and his wife should share a lawyer or not.

Four other people have been arrested, including Mark Hanna, head of security at News International.

The most recent charges appear to stem not from the act of phone hacking itself, but from wholesale attempts to destroy large amounts of evidence in the form of emails, as civil suits against phone hacking began in 2009.

Following the initial revelations concerning the phone hacking by News of the World royal reporter Clive Goodman in 2006, the case had lain dormant for nearly three years, until reports surfaced of the systemic nature of the hacking.

Since 2009, there have been increasingly desperate attempts to maintain the original defence that Goodman was a “rogue reporter” — a process aided by the determination of the police not to pursue the case at any cost.

Unsurprisingly, as subsequent revelations have shown that News Corp, through its red-top tabloids, had been paying literally millions of pounds to police for tips, favours and phone numbers.

Once the full collusion of the police was demonstrated and a separate series of investigations inaugurated — one of which, Weeting, nabbed Brooks and Co this morning — there was no chance of avoiding anything at all.

That has now become News Corp’s main problem, because it’s now clear that for the past three years or more, it has been running a wholesale data destruction program, not merely deleting emails, but destroying the actual computers that reporters had been using at the time.

That, together with Brooks’ remarks to a parliamentary committee several years ago, to the effect that News “had paid police for information in the past” — may be enough to land her and others in deep trouble.

Today’s arrests are bad news not merely for those fingered, but for la famiglia Murdoch. The whole scandal has proceeded so far by lower levels of the grand conspiracy collapsing, and implicating higher executives — as with News’ former legal supremo dobbing in James Murdoch, on the “for Neville” email, which demonstrated that Murdoch jnr had knowledge of systemic hacking, and denied such when speaking to Parliament.

Brooks has been among the most loyal of Murdoch’s minions, but she is now in serious trouble, with the prospect of a felony charge and conviction looming. Would the temptation to distribute the blame by blaming the family prove all too tempting? Former NotW editor Andy Coulson — who will almost certainly face charges — is desperately suing News to try and get payment for his legal fees restored.

Otherwise, he’ll be going up against the plod using the Basildon court duty solicitor. Like all participants, perhaps the most draining thing he’s facing is that these matters will drag on for years, overshadowing every area of his life.

The whole issue has become enormously complicated by the fact that the whole thing has been brought to public attention by the Leveson inquiry, which has been running in parallel to the police inquiries. Without the lash of Leveson, the police wouldn’t have been compelled to actually make any sort of investigation.

Yet the fact that it’s been a forum where people can make any sort of allegations they liked — with Brooks being called among other things the “criminal-in-chief”, — may paradoxically give Brooks and other grounds to say that they could not possibly receive a fair trial.

That was underscored yesterday when Met PR flack Dick Federocio, gave evidence, denying that he had fixed the tendering process to allow a former News of the World hack to get a plumb PR job at the Yard.

Page 1 of 2 | Next page

Tags: , , ,

Categories: Companies, Europe, MEDIA

7 Responses

Comments page: 1 |
  1. Media licensees must, of course, be fit and proper persons.
    ‘Fit’ meaning able to walk unassisted to the committee table and tell lies without the aid of a breathing apparatus and ‘proper’ meaning able to avoid overpaying the police so as not to unduly inflate the price of bribery.

    by Andybob on Mar 14, 2012 at 7:36 pm

  2. It’s 8.58pm..and not one comment save for mine on this amaaaaaaaaaaazing development

    by Kevin Herbert on Mar 14, 2012 at 9:00 pm

  3. I don’t want to defend the indefensible. But your Guy who writes so brilliantly on US politics and culture may be mistaking some legal basics. According to the Grauniad, Brooks is yet to be charged with anything: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/mar/13/rebekah-brooks-and-husband-arrested-phone-hacking

    Arrested on ‘suspicion’ is not yet ‘charged’ in the sense of formally accused, to face committal.

    Still, let the glacier of justice slowly grind …

    by Graeme Orr on Mar 14, 2012 at 11:14 pm

  4. 2 hours 50 minutes later: Brooks is finished. What could she do? They don’t want Murdoch - he’d get off. His power is gone. He can barely stay credible in a backwater like Australia. Brooks - gone.

    by sickofitall on Mar 14, 2012 at 11:48 pm

  5. Kevin,
    Stunned into silence?

    by Puff, the Magic Dragon. on Mar 15, 2012 at 12:19 am

  6. Doesn’t it make you wonder about the Federal police and the NSW police and News Ltd in Australia? How do we know there are no payments for information going on here? Did we all learn nothing from Fitzgerald? How do we know that some political leaks are not from phone taps? During the Fitzgerald inquiry the complicity of the media in government corruption was pointed out by the commissioner. Some of these facts are conveniently forgotten. Perhaps the Murdochs learned a lot of their craft at home.

    by sottile6 on Mar 15, 2012 at 1:37 am

  7. @ Kevin I read about this early Tuesday in an Irish Newspaper, because I expected more information there. Brooks husband is identified as a good friend of the Prime Minister of Britain. @ Sottile6 I have not forgotton Fitzgerald though back then I had no real interest in governance and political sins against the peoples. I am sick of the blow by blow instalments! I have no doubt much of what went on in Britian with NoTW was mirrored in some way here. My own experience is enough for me to know our media and politicians fall a long way short of the often promoted ideal. What is the comfortable arrangements which result in certain media interest with the capacity to influence being given drops and ride alongs. While independents are simply ignored by police media. There is enough grist for the political mill in Australia where abuse of power and influence peddling is alive and well. Edward James

    by Edward James on Mar 15, 2012 at 5:37 am

« | »