tip off

Essential: for big retailers, price and service are a key problem

Younger Australians are saving more, spending less and shopping more online but it is older Australians who are fleeing major retailers, according to polling by Essential Report.

Last week Essential asked a series of questions about spending habits. The results appear to confirm several current retail trends, but age difference appears a key issue in the retreat of shoppers from major retailers.

While all voters were broadly equal in those saying they were saving more, or saving less, compared to last year (28% said saving more, 33% saving less), younger people were far more likely to say they were saving more than last year, with 41% of voters under 35 saying they were saving more compared to 29% saving less; only 19% of people over 55 said they were saving more; 40% said less. Those in full-time work tended to be saving more as well, they said.

Voters also strongly indicated they were spending more on food and groceries (60% said more, 10% said less), while spending less on clothing and electrical goods (20% more to 38% less) and entertainment (similar figures). Unsurprisingly, spending on gas and electricity was also strongly up, according to voters, but telephone and internet services spending had also increased, people said, by 38% to 11%. They also said they’re shopping less at major retail stores (10% more, 36% less) and less at major shopping centres (11%, 32%) while shopping at local shopping centres had held up, and shopping on the internet had grown (42% up, 18% less).

The shift online has been led by 18-24-year-olds, 20% of whom said they were shopping online a lot more, and 25-34-year-olds, 16% of whom said they were shopping online a lot more. Over 55s, however, were more loath to go online and 20% of seniors actually said they were shopping online a lot less.

And consistent with what we know about the direction of retail, voters identified price and service standards as areas of dissatisfaction with major retailers. The range of products available at major retailers, and the quality of goods, were both rated satisfactory by voters, with little variability across demographics: 55% said they were satisfied with range and only 14% said they weren’t; 46% said they were satisfied with quality and only 16% not.

But more voters were unhappy with prices at major retailers than happy — 34% to 30% — and 36% said they were unhappy with service levels, compared to 31% happy. Older voters in particular appear very unhappy with prices and services. Only 18% of seniors and 24% of 55-64-year-olds were happy with prices, and more than a third of both were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with them, and there were similar figures for service — in fact, 50% of seniors were unhappy with standards of service at major retailers, and 43% of 55-64-year-olds.

This has had a direct impact on shopping behaviour: 46% of seniors and 47% of 55-64-year-olds were shopping either a little or a lot less at major retailers, and were also staying away from major shopping centres as well.

Seniors and middle-aged people tend to account for much less of the overall retail spend than younger people but in this case it appears major retailers can’t win either way: younger shoppers who profess not to be overly fussed about issues such as price or service at big retailers are moving onto the internet in droves, while older shoppers, more resistant to moving online, are being turned off major retailers by poor service and high prices.

Another interesting absence from the results is any marked difference between men and women, despite the alleged difference in attitude and interest in shopping. If there’s any difference, women are a little more likely than men to have reduced their shopping at major retailers in the past year, and a little more likely to have shopped more online.

There of course are all stated preferences, rather than revealed preferences: people’s perceptions of their own consumer behaviour over the past 12 months may have been influenced by what they’ve been told by a media keen to emphasise the gloom and doom of retailing. But it appears that it’s not all about the high dollar and the internet: old-fashioned things such as quality in-store service are also a problem for our ever-complaining big retailers.

3
  • 1
    Eva Brocklehurst
    Posted Tuesday, 17 January 2012 at 1:48 pm | Permalink

    Finally, some awareness that it’s not just higher prices that’s putting off people from shopping at big retailers and shopping centres.
    It’s the forbidding monoliths that shopping centres have become in major cities - the time it takes to negotiate traffic, find a park and mill through the crowd.
    Then when you’re there you might find what you want, and perhaps get a bargain.
    However, more often than not it’s frustrating, time consuming and certainly not pleasurable.
    I’d actually rather pay a little MORE if it meant I could get what I want from the safety and comfort of my home, delivered to my door, and not have to drive somewhere.

  • 2
    Hugh (Charlie) McColl
    Posted Tuesday, 17 January 2012 at 2:37 pm | Permalink

    Funnily enough, Eva, the people who answered the (completely useless, irrelevant) poll were most likely sitting “in the safety and comfort” of their homes, making stuff up so that it could be reported alongside a dozen other useless opinion polls. Last week they would have said they liked shopping in “forbidding monoliths” because of the colour and movement or the air conditioning.
    Next week: why Anna Bligh’s hotpants are cool and how you can look cool too - without driving, parking, getting frustrated or losing your pleasure. Stay at home. Perhaps you’ll get a bargain!

  • 3
    Posted Tuesday, 17 January 2012 at 11:29 pm | Permalink

    vote main street shops not big mall landlords

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...