Facebook Google Menu Linkedin lock Pinterest Search Twitter

Advertisement

VIC

Nov 17, 2011

Liberals exposed as kingmakers in bitter chicken spat

A shadowy astroturf group led by two Liberal Party operatives has emerged to bend public opinion in the bitter Baiada poultry workplace dispute.

Share

A shadowy astroturf group led by two Liberal Party operatives has emerged to bend public opinion in the bitter Baiada Poultry workplace dispute.

A press release was distributed yesterday on behalf of a so-called “People Power Group” comprising “non-union” employees of the chicken processor, which is locked in a stand-off with its unionised workforce over wages and conditions.

The NUW has erected a picket line around the company’s Laverton North plant, which has been shutdown since last Wednesday.

While it didn’t refer to any individual by name, the release spruiking a “peaceful” counter-protest at Julia Gillard’s Altona office included the mobile phone number and personal email address of one-time Liberal Higgins hopeful Jason Aldworth.

Yesterday afternoon, Aldworth arrived at the PM’s digs accompanied by former Maribyrnong Liberal candidate Hamish Jones, who was disendorsed in 2007 for branding then-state Labor transport minister Lynne Kosky a “bitch” and a “f-ckwit” on his personal blog.

The duo oversaw the delivery of “poster-sized” petition to the Prime Minister. About 25 protesters waved placards daubed with phrases like “I want to go to work”, which looked to have been cheaply produced at Officeworks.

When they arrived they were confronted by NUW members, 220 of whom are on strike.

However, Crikey understands many “People Power” members were reluctant to protest and had to have their arm twisted by Aldworth to confront their fellow employees. Some are believed to be supervisors, Baiada contractors or disenfranchised ex-Meatworkers still smarting from a previous demarcation dispute with the union.

Victoria Police attacked the picket line on Friday night following a Supreme Court injunction preventing NUW officials, but not members of the community, from blocking access to the site. The dispute has attracted wall-to-wall media coverage with the Sunday Herald Sun devoting its front page to the clash.

Baiada was represented in court by HR Nicholls Society favourite Stuart Wood and Tanya Cirkovic, who did her articles at Kroger & Kroger in the late ’80s and worked with Peter Costello on the Dollar Sweets case. Senior Liberals including Eric Abetz are believed to be keen to turn the dispute into a talismanic attack on Labor’s Fair Work legislation.

Aldworth – a former employee of Michael Kroger’s investment bank JT Campbell – was Liberal state vice-president and is currently a director of the controversial Civic Group, the lobbying outlet formed following his defection from CPR Communications alongside ex-John Pandazopoulos staffer Brett Miller and former ALP state secretary Andres Puig. He was slated to replace Costello in Higgins before Kelly O’Dwyer intervened.

Aldworth declined to be quoted on the record this morning, however Crikey understands he being paid directly by Baiada management to engineer the anti-union message.

His offsider Jones has on several occasions employed tactics similar to those on display yesterday.

In the now infamous 2003 DVD State of the Union, documenting the struggle for control of the Melbourne University Student Union, Jones is exposed rorting the club affiliation process to setup a front-group called “Free Beer” to mislead supporters of the popular More Beer to channel support to the ruling Liberal and Labor Right clique.

He was slated to run against Bill Shorten in Maribyrnong in 2007 but was disendorsed after he insulted Kosky on his blog Ranting and Rambling.

Aldworth’s Civic Group was exposed last year when it emerged as the brains behind the “Alliance of Australian Retailers”, a Big Tobacco-funded front astroturf operation purporting to represent small business owners protesting the federal government’s plain packaging legislation.

Baiada is run by BRW Rich-Lister John Camilleri with his family boasting a total wealth of $495 million (up from $372 million last year). In 2009, the company pulled off the landmark acquisition of Bartter-Steggles, leaving the firm with a massive 35% of the Australian poultry market.

A spokesperson for the company did not respond to requests for comment this morning.

NUW state secretary Tim Kennedy said that Baiada’s competitors were planning a fresh kill to keep chicken supplies moving and that he “hoped the company would come back with serious ideas to settle this dispute.”

Andrew Crook —

Andrew Crook

Former Crikey Senior Journalist

Get a free trial to post comments
More from Andrew Crook

Advertisement

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola

6 comments

Leave a comment

6 thoughts on “Liberals exposed as kingmakers in bitter chicken spat

  1. Lord Barry Bonkton

    The guy with the Man Boobs and camera looks like he was on Australia’s Biggest loser.

  2. geomac

    MAC4U
    Two different situations and size of participants. Parliament house which has its press gallery always at the ready and the publicised protest. A section of the protesters broke the law and probably to attract media attention. Compare that to a small picket line that has barely raised a few inches of column space and no concerns about safety. Along comes the goon to intimidate the line by nudging them with a car and the tv crew is there to record it. They were not there the day before or the day after. One illegal action by protesters is quite different from peaceful workers being provoked by a security thug to create a reaction for the camera. Why focus on what happened when its better to muddy the water with something else unrelated ?

  3. Mac4U

    GEOMAC…you can also assume that the TV crew were the same that were at Canberra’s Parliament House when the unionists smashed down the front doors!!! … another set up!!!

  4. geomac

    The incident where a security guy nudges the workers line with his car had to be a set up. Tv camera there to capture the response of the workers o the provocation . Was the camera crew there the day before or even hours before the set up. You can safely assume they were there in time to capture what they hoped would be anger at a bouncer type stooge pushing his car into the line. If bosses can,t or won,t use genuine negotiation imagine how brutal they would have used workchoices. No wonder the public were repulsed by that draconian IR law. As seen with Qantas the bosses still have the upper hand in disputes yet still squeal like stuck pigs.

  5. puddleduck

    They aren’t the only workers being abused by Baida. Everyone’s forgotten about the chickens, who pay with their lives.

    The ACCC is taking Baida to court for misleading conduct, in claiming the chickens unfortunate enough to fall into their clutches are “free to roam: – here’s the ACCC media release:
    http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/1006465

    If you eat chicken, you owe it to yourself, and the birds, to read this:
    “The modern phenomenon of “cheap chicken” comes at enormous costs to the welfare of the animals involved.”
    http://www.animalsaustralia.org/factsheets/broiler_chickens.php

  6. John Bennetts

    It’s hard to believe that, so far, there are no comments.

    This article has disclosed exactly the type of undercover flag-of-convenience work that too often appears as management’s response to reasoned union action.

    After refusing to negotiate fairly or in good faith, the script reads straight to provoking legal action, initiation of court action whenever the workers’ representatives do anything, act the bully and stand behind a row of hired bullies.

    Bullies in the court, using as tools bulk supplies of money and the services of gun for hire lawyers.
    Bullies in the public arena – in this case, failed and discredited stooges from a political party not yet comfortable with losing not one federal election but two in recent years, a party which has demonstrated unthinking, policy-free blind opposition to everything on knee-jerk almost religious grounds.

    A party which bases its claims of legitimacy on an assumption that, since they were born to rule, these two election results must have been wrong and should be set aside, with more and more elections until the electors get it right.

    It’s no surprise, then, when there is trouble at the docks or the chicken processing works or Dollar Sweets or wherever the number of workers is greater than a couple of hundred, that management with born-to-rule attitudes are seen to be receiving clandestine support from the Liberal Party of Australia’s dirt team.

    Thanks for placing these goings-on on the public record.

Leave a comment