Facebook Google Menu Linkedin lock Pinterest Search Twitter

Advertisement

TV & Radio

Sep 19, 2011

Leaks shows local footy costs cash-strapped ABC $22 per viewer

The cash-strapped ABC is spending a massive $22 per viewer each week of the season to bring Tasmanian football to a tiny audience of about 3000, reveal figures leaked to Crikey.

Share

The cash-strapped ABC is spending a massive $22 per viewer each week of the season to bring Tasmanian football to a tiny audience of about 3000, reveal figures leaked to Crikey.

Responding to the leak, the Community and Public Sector Union has accused ABC management of collusion and selectively leaking commercial in confidence data to private sector producers. In a letter released to Crikey, the CPSU has called for ABC managing director Mark Scott to hold a leaks inquiry and take disciplinary action.

The revelations are part of the continuing white-hot battle within the national broadcaster over the correct balance between in-house and outsourcing of television production.

Within the ABC it is a current joke that it might be cheaper to shout each Tassie football fan a taxi and a ticket to the game rather than to send the expensive outside-broadcast van and staff each week.  The more so since audiences for local football are declining by 30% a year.

These figures are regarded as a scandal by some in ABC management. They are part of a bunch that have been leaked, and that reveal the true cost of the ABC maintaining outside-broadcast vans and production crews, which in turn cuts into the money available for commissioning new television entertainment content.

In total, on a Saturday afternoon six fully crewed ABC outside-broadcast vans cover local football in every state, but the average total audience is just 135,000, and falling fast.

The figures have become available in the lead-up to week Monday’s public hearing of the Senate committee in to recent ABC programming decisions, which was established after the recent axing of locally produced programs, including Art Nation, and resulting staff redundancies.

The Senate hearing is shaping to be a battle royal, with appearances not only by ABC management and union representatives, but also by the people  behind some of Australia’s leading independent production houses.

Nasty allegations will fly in all directions. Whether light is generated as well as heat remains to be seen.

In comments to Crikey, the ABC section secretary of the CPSU, Graeme Thomson, claims that if TV budgets have been selectively leaked to some producers, it will give them a competitive advantage. “They would be able to adjust their pitch for commissioning and extract more money out of the ABC. Their bargaining power would increase if they knew exactly how much money the ABC had up their sleeve.”

Meanwhile, Nick Murray, of private production house Cordell Jigsaw, has accused the ABC’s chief operating officer, David Pendleton, of “running an empire of staff and facilities which is not responsive to the actual needs of ABC TV. The ABC should not have these large fixed cost in-house facilities. No other network in Australia has this level of in house facilities”.

The leaked figures show that nationwide, the cost of covering local football is $2.63 per viewer per episode, or $469,000 per episode. This compares to the average cost of television entertainment, which is 23 cents per viewer and $196,000 per episode, with an average audience of 962,000.

Meanwhile factual television content — documentaries and the like — costs 29 cents per episode per viewer, or $94,000 per episode, for an average audience of 489,000.

The background to these figures is a bitter battle within the ABC between head of television Kim Dalton, and Pendleton.

Dalton has argued for more control over the resources spent on television content, many of which are presently tied up in fixed costs represented by the staff and facilities under Pendleton’s control.

The high fixed costs have resulted in reductions of 30-40% in the amount of money available to commission new entertainment programs in the past four years, independent producers claim.

Due to increased government funding being largely tied to production of Australian drama, and the high level of fixed costs, entertainment is one of the few areas of discretionary spending where cuts can be made.

Cost pressures on the ABC are also resulting from the increased cost of buying in programs, caused by increased competition from commercial digital multichannels, and declining sales of DVDs.

The internal battle has resulted in Scott’s announcement in August of an internal strategy to determine the balance between in-house and outsourced production over the next few years.

Those who favour retaining in-house production argue that the capacity it represents is vital for a national broadcaster. Thomson said in comments to Crikey that outside-broadcast vans were used most regularly to cover sport, but were also used for significant regional events such as Anzac Day marches.

He said: “The attack that is being launched by the so called independent producers is all about trying to get their hands on the money that underpins regional multicam coverage … Take away sport and you then also lose coverage of the rest.”

But these comments caused what could only be described as an explosive reaction from Murray, who pointed out that Anzac Day comes only once a year. “That is unbelievable bullshit … all they are trying to do is protect their jobs, and those jobs would exist in the private sector if they were not at the ABC.”

The CPSU, Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance and groups such as the Friends of the ABC have been conducting a campaign against ABC outsourcing of production — which was given some comfort by Communications Minister Stephen Conroy in his comments around the time of the recent program cancellations.

Recently Dalton has been encouraging companies in the private sector to fight back against the union campaign.

These competing points of view have come to light in the submissions to the Senate inquiry, which are available here.

Independent producers argue that the Australian public does not distinguish between internally or externally produced programs, seeing them all as simply “ABC programs”. They say that external programs are the most popular with viewers, and employ large numbers of Australian staff and crew.

“ABC TV management needs the flexibility to manage its budget freely to deliver the Australian public the best programs, regardless of whether they are produced internally or externally,” says a submission signed by Cordell Jigsaw, Princess Pictures, Zapruder’s Other Films, Giant Dwarf and Token Artists.

Shows produced by these companies include The Election Chaser, We Can Be Heroes, Summer Heights High, Angry Boys, Hungry Beast, and The Gruen Transfer. Other programs created for the ABC by the independent sector include Kath and Kim, the Ita Buttrose biopic Paper Giants and new drama The Slap.

Programs produced in-house at the ABC include Q&A, Media Watch, First Tuesday Book Club, Collectors, Can We Help, New Inventors, Gardening Australia, Auctions, Giggle and Hoot, Good Game, Changi, Message Stick, Poh’s Kitchen, Catalyst, Compass, Play School and The Cook & the Chef.

Some programs that are internally made still use contract production staff. Spicks and Specks, for example, uses the same contract production staff and writers who work on programs for the independent production sector.

Other submissions to the  Senate inquiry argue that the distinction between internal and external production is a false one. For example, Dr Tony Moore, of the National Centre for Australian Studies at Monash University, argues that the ABC has failed to recruit talent widely enough, that its drama is dull and safe, and that in all this the in-house outsourcing dispute is a “false divide”.

Says Moore: “I have admiration for the work of both in-house ABC program makers and the independents. It’s an artificial divide as so many independent producers are ex-ABC staff who reckon they get a better deal this way. It is often the case that, free from managerial interference and compromise, contracted production teams led by cultural entrepreneurs like Chris Lilley, The Chaser or Zapruder’s Other Productions Andrew Denton are able to break more aesthetic rules, cut red tape, and negotiate more creative autonomy, especially in comedy and documentary. These partnerships are to be applauded as they enable the ABC to intersect with the wider Australian creative community than exists in its own silo. This reality harmonises with the vision of the ABC as a ‘town square’ rather than a factory.”

In its submission, the CPSU  argues that the outsourcing of programs by ABC television is “transforming the ABC” and limits its ability to deliver its charter responsibilities, particularly to specialist audiences.

The CPSU submission calls for a full review of the direction of the ABC, and claims it “no longer has a clear vision of where it is headed or its role or purpose”.

“The recent decisions to axe programs are part of an ongoing process over the past five years to systematically destroy the ABC’s ability to generate its own programs. The significant public investment in its infrastructure is being wasted. The CPSU argues that the drive to outsource production is not cost effective. The ABC has been a highly efficient production house.”

The CPSU submission directly fingers Dalton as the foe of in-house production.

“The current TV management group acts as though it is a commissioning arm of Screen Australia.”

Meanwhile in a personal submission, ABC broadcaster and former staff elected director Quentin Dempster also attacks Dalton as the agent of outsourcing, and claims that the co-production model means the ABC no longer has a capacity to generate its own intellectual property or make its own documentaries or natural history programs.

Dempster and the CPSU call for detailed disclosure of the ABC’s internal commissioning budgets.

Dempster argues that unless the parliamentary inquiry gets to the bottom of the facts, ABC management will “dodge its commitment” to a mixed internal and external production model, making only news and current affairs in house. “This should not be allowed to occur without a full public debate of the implications for the future of the ABC as a cultural, broadcasting and now ‘cybercasting’ institution meant to underpin sectoral diversity.”

Margaret Simons —

Margaret Simons

Journalist, author and director of the Centre for Advanced Journalism

Get a free trial to post comments
More from Margaret Simons

Advertisement

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola

10 comments

Leave a comment

10 thoughts on “Leaks shows local footy costs cash-strapped ABC $22 per viewer

  1. Fran Barlow

    I’d need a lot more than $22 to watch Tasmanian football each week, though I might perhaps watch the test pattern for about that ( I could read a good book while it was on). Perhaps that’s the answer.

    Here’s a thought though — why not put something on other than sport?. Crazy I know …

  2. Peter Ormonde

    Stephen…

    Even better, combining deerhunting with footie would really pull a crowd – albeit at a distance.

    I am appalled that Suzanne Blake would allow those loathsome public servants to pollute the noble game of bowls with their interminable taxpayer subsidised commentaries. Now packs of white leghorns packing sniper rifles and axes – everyone would be watching that!

    Let’s put the biff back into bowls!

  3. Stephen

    Yeah, I agree with Tedesco, show us some real football why don’tcha? What is ‘Tasmanian football’ anyway, they might as well film Tasmanian logchops or deerhunts. (What a relief that SBS showed us the Daegu IAAF world titles live.)

  4. Roberto Tedesco

    Time for the ABC to gear up to show A-league football live.

  5. eric

    Leave the local State footy like the VFL alone.The ABC squanders a lot more on useless shows and it isnt there to compete with the commercial channels.

  6. michael crook

    Its quite simple really, the ABC is there to provide a service. Private producers are there to make a profit. The two are irreconcilable. Prior to Alston/Shiers the ABC managed to provide a service, a very very good service, but with successive chips away at the corporation moving the funding to the private sector, it no longer does this. I am not the only to view this as major tragedy.

    One needs only to look at news and current affairs where the commercial media seem to provide most of the source reporting, in all of its overblown bias, and ABC presenters, masquerading as journalists, seem happy to toe the commercial line.

    I did formally complain a couple of years ago that the advertising of commercial media entities was a blatant breach of the ABC charter, but alas my complaint was not successful.

  7. Scott

    Remember that these are our tax dollars at work. We are spending $22 a viewer to showcase Tasmanian footy to the world.
    But I am not surprised. This is what you get when there is no motivation for value creation in an organisation; you get bloated staff levels, inefficiencies and waste.
    In my opinion, ABC should have been sold off long ago. If not that, at the very least, they should outsource their non-core functions and production capacity.

  8. Suzanne Blake

    And the ABC want to drop lawn bowls (Saturday 5pm) , where 500,000 watch a week.

  9. Mark Duffett

    Even $22/week during the season amounts to way less than a pay TV sports subcription. And the only way I’d contemplate one of those would be if it covered local footy.

  10. paddy

    An outstanding piece of informative journalism Margaret.
    I’m actually far better informed about the ABC’s inner workings after reading that.
    Well done.

Leave a comment