tip off

Death of the bookshop: what you pay for when you buy local

Early this year, I did something I had always sworn I’d never do. On a quiet, late-night hour I set foot in IKEA, wandered its furnished labyrinth and behemoth aisles, and came away with four Billy bookcases, which my boyfriend and I spent the next day assembling and loading with the books that were overflowing from our other, less-disposable shelving.

IKEA. Now there’s a company that understands price-points, starting with the price range it believes consumers will pay for its items and then working its way backwards to create objects at those prices. As we stood before the rows of bookshelves, I noticed several signs informing customers that, due to IKEA’s buying power and recent negotiations with suppliers, the price of Billy bookcases had actually come down in the past year.

Later, we passed full-sized kitchen clocks priced at three dollars. Back at home, once we’d negotiated the Allen keys and drilled in a couple of holes the IKEA-bots had missed, we filled our entire wall with bookshelves for $300. This was the global economy at work, and I was a part of it.

The Book Depository is the global economy at work, too. Don’t get me wrong: I’m not comparing half-baked furniture with books. The similarity lies in the fact that they are both rational outcomes of a global market in which price is the defining consideration. Like IKEA, The Book Depository is incredibly efficient and, like IKEA, it is particularly efficient in terms of price — thanks, in large part, to the power of scale (The Book Depository’s managing director Kieron Smith said in 2009 that his company is “a volume-led business, and we can get very good deals with couriers as we are shipping upwards of 130,000 products per week”).

The difference is that while I’ll occasionally put up with the many things I don’t like about IKEA in order to get my furniture cheap, The Book Depository and its Amazonian siblings don’t get any of my business. Why? I care more about books than about the furniture they are stacked on.

Obviously, I have a vested interest in my consumer dollars going to local bookshops – I edit a trade journal for the Australian book industry. Without that industry, there will be no magazine. But my interest in this issue extends far beyond ensuring my next pay cheque. My job has given me an awareness of the chain of production for books that I otherwise wouldn’t have had. It’s this understanding of the trade as it currently stands — and what’s in it for me — that influences where I buy books. In this sense, I see my decision to purchase books in good local bookshops, as opposed to online UK megastores, as a self-interested one. I like those shops and the local publishers they support, and I want them to stick around.

So what do I think I’m paying for when I buy my books locally? Well, taking my bookshop of choice, Readings, I’m paying for online and in-person recommendations and reviews; the physical space the store provides to meet and browse with friends, discussing books or the ideas they provoke; an undeniable sense of community which extends beyond the realm of the book; the very act of collation that highlights books I am interested in among the thousands more around; and — through the Readings Foundation — financial support for an adult literacy program at Melbourne’s Western Suburbs Indigenous Gathering Place, educational scholarships for disadvantaged students, a tutoring program for children of migrant families from Sudan, a regional programming stream at the Emerging Writers’ Festival and several Victorian Writers’ Centre residencies (which I like thinking I might experience one day), as well as many other great projects.

My interstate ‘locals’ include the hive of literary activity that is Avid Reader in Brisbane (a bookshop that has produced several authors from its ranks of staff, all of whom have their literary ears to the ground on readers’ behalf), the beautiful Riverbend Books across the way in Bulimba, whose owner Suzy Wilson founded the Indigenous Literacy Project and hosts wonderful author events on the store’s huge deck; Gleebooks in Sydney, which fosters a sense of community around reading — where the launch of a Harry Potter book, for example, might be cause for a special steam-train ride and picnic for young fans (and where owner David Gaunt’s contribution to his community was recently recognised when he was made a member of the Order of Australia).

At these and other great bookshops around the country I encounter engaged staff, author events — and in some cases, whole writers’ festivals and book fairs (not to mention the best cards and gift-wrapping going). And that’s in addition to the books themselves.

When it comes to the books, I know my dollars are also serving me in the long term: when I buy from my local bookseller — whether the book I am buying is Australian or not — part of that money is almost always going to a local publisher. They, in turn, are ensuring both that fantastic overseas titles continue to be brought to my attention (such as Every Man in this Village is a Liar, whose author Megan Stack visited Australia for last year’s Byron Bay Writers’ Festival thanks to her Australian publisher), and that books of social and cultural import, like local writer Chloe Hooper’s The Tall Man, continue to be published.

The importance of local booksellers to small, independent publishers was demonstrated recently when the Small Press Underground Networking Community (SPUNC) worked in partnership with a local retailer (Readings) to make its members’ ebooks available to consumers. At a time when small presses are increasingly branching out in promotional strategies, reaching niche audiences through social networks — as so many pundits suggest publishers will need to do in the future — the continued necessity of bricks-and-mortar booksellers is evident in this decision to partner with Readings on their ebook venture.

I’m not saying that some of the benefits provided by Australian bookshops mentioned above are not available online from overseas; I’m saying that, given how much I value them in their current form, and given the broader gains I see along the chain of production, I choose to factor these benefits into my purchasing decisions. And I suspect many who feel the way I do about their local bookshop and local publishers might choose to shop locally rather than on overseas websites if they had the chance to ponder some of the implications of their decisions.

Like looking for local produce at the supermarket or choosing locally-designed and made clothing, I’m shopping for my books with an awareness of the bigger picture. The phrase ‘ethical consumption’ surfaces with regard to a range of other goods, and in the simplest sense it should apply here. I’m not talking about human rights, animal rights, the ethics of life-and-death, but that very simple, individual question of whether my book-buying habits are compatible with my broader life values. Whether my decisions and actions are contributing to the kind of world I’d like to create — or to something else entirely.

To me, the assumption that so long as prices are getting lower the consumer must be benefiting is a pretty naive one. Something that is often assumed when modelling economic behaviour is that an individual has ‘perfect information’ on the outcomes of their purchasing decision. While few would argue anyone can ever have truly perfect knowledge of such outcomes, it doesn’t hurt to try to add to the data.

In the United States (where the number of independent bricks-and-mortar booksellers has reportedly dropped from around 6000 in the 1990s to just over 2000 at present), remaining booksellers have a whole campaign built around this — it’s called IndieBound, a movement that identifies local independent shops (booksellers or otherwise) and thanks customers for shopping in them, using a number of mediums to highlight the wider benefits of their purchasing decisions.

Indiebound was officially launched in Australia at the Australian Booksellers Association conference over the weekend.

Some will try to tell you that it’s impossible for Australia’s book industry to do any better on prices. It’s not true. There are aspects of the local and international book industries that are incredibly inefficient — the supply chain for non-Australian titles being one example. Too often, local publishers or distributors hold exclusive rights to overseas-generated titles but do not hold stock, preferring to import from overseas. As these publishers wait to receive enough local orders to fill a pallet (and thus save on freight), local orders from booksellers can take weeks to fulfil. Such inefficiencies present a complex challenge, but not an insurmountable one.

When the government announced in 2009, following a report from the Productivity Commission, that it wasn’t going to change Australia’s laws regarding the parallel importation of books (that is, it would uphold the status quo which says a bookseller cannot import a title if there is a local supplier for that book) it made its stance clear: “If books cannot be made available in a timely fashion and at a competitive price, customers will opt for online sales and ebooks.” Put simply: the government didn’t need to change legislation to ensure competition, ebooks and the web were already doing that for them.

Last Christmas, almost half of Australian booksellers my publication surveyed reported sales had dropped compared to the same time the previous year. Many of them also reported customers in-store talking to each other about The Book Depository, or seeing browsers take photographs of the books and their ISBNs — in order, presumably, to go and buy them elsewhere online. And while some in the industry blame the group’s woes on poor management, there’s no denying that REDgroup Retail’s demise has highlighted some of the pressures facing all local booksellers.

Certainly, publishers and booksellers will have to lift their game. Any bookshop without an online sales facility and an excellent online search function is condemning themselves to oblivion; those bricks-and-mortar shops that do provide online sales report increases in that area year after year, while exclusively online booksellers here (who, by definition, funnel all their efforts into online business) are reporting exponential growth — with sales up 800 per cent, in one case. Shops that have survived without knowledgeable, egalitarian and friendly customer service (and yes, some have) won’t for much longer.

Booksellers who have entered the game because they romanticised a life surrounded by books and eschew necessary business management considerations will go, if they haven’t already; the rest will need to focus on their points-of-difference in a way they never have before. These stores will also have to get better at thanking their customers. If a result of community discussion of this topic is that a customer makes the decision to buy local, they should be genuinely and regularly thanked for it at every point in the transaction, whether it’s in-store or online (as IndieBound encourages US bookshops to do).

Publishers, on the other hand, face the enormous challenge of shifting a century-old and rapidly outmoded business model while simultaneously trying to stay afloat — not unlike attempting to steer a slow-moving ship around an iceberg. They will be mixing print-on-demand and short-run printing into a business model that was built around the initial multiple-thousand-copy print run necessitated by traditional print technology.

The supply-chain earthquake that ebooks will cause aside, the tide of consumers who don’t care if their bookshop disappears, replaced by an IKEA-sized book factory on the other side of the world, will be enough to force the local industry to change. So have no fear: the book industry will adjust itself. At the same time, those of us who care about more than price should buy with our eyes open, knowing that with our purchases we are also, in part, choosing the kind of local bookish community that is left at the end of that process.

Inevitably, there will be winners and losers. Because even though the industry as a whole will become more efficient, not all the factors cited by the local book trade as reasons for Australia’s prices can be solved. The issue of basic wages, the challenges posed by a small population, the high cost of retail and office space: these factors won’t disappear. Which means, if price is genuinely all we care about, most of our bookshops will.

Instead of subscribing to a position that says price will be the only deciding factor in who wins, I’d like to recognise that I have a role to play in choosing who I’d like the winners to be. I would like to be one of them. I would win by getting to keep my local bookstore, which brings me much happiness, great local publishing and, ultimately, economic benefit. I would like the losers to be the Ikeas of the bookselling world, the ones that offer nothing above and beyond price and convenience. And so I shop accordingly. When it comes to books, anyway.

When I was a toddler my father was a carpenter, making furniture on commission. I remember playing in the wood shavings of the converted stable in Flemington that he used as a workshop. The other day he visited our home, and when he saw our new shelves he stood, momentarily, in that kind of reverie people experience when some part of their former life returns unbidden, like a curious surprise. He ran his hands along the melamine, and began telling us how he used to measure up spaces like our wall, built shelves like our shelves – though out of actual wood and with none of those little IKEA holes.

With his big carpenter hands resting on one of the shelves, he calculated what something like this bookcase would have cost to make back then. Of course, he said, even then he never really made any money, because things had already begun to change. Today, even if we had asked my father to make those exact crappy shelves for us without charging for labour, he wouldn’t have been able to beat IKEA’s price. Such is the bulk-buying power available in the contemporary global market.

One day, the continuing growth in ebooks suggests, I may well choose to have most of my library on my computer rather than my wall. Recommendations and reviews and conversation about books might have moved entirely online, along with most of the books themselves. If that happens, I’ll be considering a whole new set of values and factors in making my book-purchasing decisions. But for now, I’ll continue to spend my money on the thing I value most — which is having wonderful bookshops here in my small part of a very big world.

Matthia Dempsey is a writer, reviewer and editor-in-chief of Bookseller+Publisher magazine.

This is an extract of ‘Meaning-of-life Type Stuff: The Survival of Australian Bookshops’, which appears in Issue Five of Kill Your Darlings. Purchase the issue here.

36
  • 1
    RamaStar
    Posted Wednesday, 27 July 2011 at 2:51 pm | Permalink

    there’s no denying that REDgroup Retail’s demise has highlighted some of the pressures facing all local booksellers.”

    I think REDgroup’s demise highlight the pressure all local retailers are facing, not just the book/publishing industry.
    It also highlight how it’s not a good idea to debt leverage a company up the wooza, and have it run by poor management/private equity firms.

    But Matthia, thank you for your piece it was nice to read some positivity about the book industry, there is far too much negativity at the moment, and too many uninformed individuals talking about ‘price’ and the death of publishing/book industry.

    You’ve pointed out rightly so many good points about the local industry the one I liked the most is reference to the publishing industry “They, in turn, are ensuring both that fantastic [local and] overseas titles continue to be brought to my attention… and that books of social and cultural import… continue to be published.”

    This argument I think applies the same to parallel importation rights. Without these laws, we would see a reduction in the amount of local content published.

    Your point
    “assumption that so long as prices are getting lower the consumer must be benefiting is a pretty naive one. Something that is often assumed when modelling economic behaviour is that an individual has ‘perfect information’ on the outcomes of their purchasing decision.”
    Is also excellent. Something again that is so often overlooked, especially by those that carp on about buying online overseas.

  • 2
    Tristan Morgan
    Posted Wednesday, 27 July 2011 at 2:59 pm | Permalink

    I would be more inclined to purchase my books locally if I could be somewhat confident that what I wanted would be in stock, and if ordered would arrive sooner than the Book Depository equivalent.

    It would also help if I could justify $99 for a book that is $40 online, with free shipping!

  • 3
    Michael James
    Posted Wednesday, 27 July 2011 at 3:05 pm | Permalink

    Same here Tristan!

    My local specialty military history bookshop (the only one in Sydney now Napoleons has closed after years of poor management) charges $120-190 for books that I obtain via Amazon for $60 plus postage.

    That is if the book is in stock, which more often than not it is not.

    Amazon is happy to tell me it is not in stock and will send me an automated email stating when it arrives, which is a damn sight more than I expect (or get) from Battlebridge Books in Parramatta.

    I triy to support them, I really do, but it’s very hard to do so I can get two or more books for the price of one locally.

    I am not an endowment fund for badly managed bookshops, rather I spend my money where I get best value for it.

  • 4
    calyptorhynchus
    Posted Wednesday, 27 July 2011 at 3:16 pm | Permalink

    Matthia

    You make bookshops sound like the Swedish welfare state!

    Seriously, in my areas of interest there is zero chance that bookshops will stock the titles I’m interested in (most aren’t even in print) and it’s obviously easier to order online.

    As for the information provided for people less sure of what they want I’m still not convinced. I’m familiar with Readings and Gleebooks &c and I haven’t found their shelves are stocked with well-chosen titles and the best books in each area. Nor have I found their staff very knowledgeable either. Both bookshops, and other, ‘specialist’ bookshops I have visited, seem to be overstocked with ‘litteratainment’ and other subpar publications.

    I think with bookshops the physical bookshop is on the way out.

  • 5
    RamaStar
    Posted Wednesday, 27 July 2011 at 3:21 pm | Permalink

    It’s interesting to note that at least two comments so far have talked about their unique taste in books and not being able to find it in mainstream bookshops. And that therefore bookshops are suffering because they’re buying these sorts of books online.

    Because you cannot find an obscure book, does not mean that trade, non-fiction and children books are not well stocked and bookshop do not do well out of these.

    Bookstores are hardly going to be on the ‘way out’ because they don’t stock [inset random book here].

  • 6
    Ilona
    Posted Wednesday, 27 July 2011 at 3:44 pm | Permalink

    if it’s more ethical to buy books from a bricks and morter book store than from book depository, where does that leave me as an almost-exclusive library user?

  • 7
    FOPPSOMMS
    Posted Wednesday, 27 July 2011 at 3:44 pm | Permalink

    Ramastar, the upshot of going online for specialist books (though I fail too see design books as specialist) is that the consumer (ie. me) becomes familiar with the benefits of online service and is now more likely to go to the online service first for any discretionary book purchases.

    I now buy most books, be they travel, fiction, non-fiction, from online services because it is easier, cheaper, and now more familiar.

    I still like nothing more than browsing the shelves at a good independent bookstore, and do still make purchases in this way, but I am less inclined to make the special trip to a bookstore for that sole purpose.

  • 8
    Jimmy Nightingale
    Posted Wednesday, 27 July 2011 at 3:48 pm | Permalink

    REDgroup Retail’s demise had more to do with its business model than overseas sales via the internet.

    Both Borders and Angus & Robertson ran a business model based on largely charging RRP for books and maintaining extensive and expensive bricks and mortar retail spaces. In addition, new releases from popular authors were usually available close by in the major department stores, like K-Mart, Target, Big W and Myer, for $10-$15 less than they were charging.

    REDgroup was poorly managed and carried a high level of debt. In addition, the global financial crisis tightened the reins on its credit and caused a plunge in consumer sentiment - books are nice things to go out and buy when you have some spare cash, but when times are tough you can always go to your local library. From a chat with staff in my local library, they have seen a large increase in borrowing activity over the last two years or so.

    As for the future of book shops in their current form, it isn’t going to be easy. The above factors are all working against them and I can see that e-books are going to do the same for the book industry that Apple’s i-Pod and digital music did for brick and mortar record stores. There will always be people who want to have a physical book in their hands, but it is difficult not to see a massive shift to e-readers in the next few years.

  • 9
    RamaStar
    Posted Wednesday, 27 July 2011 at 4:04 pm | Permalink

    Jimmy, you make excellent points about REDgroup. Something that I was trying to say, and pointed out in the mapping article also on Crikey.

    As for eBooks, we’ll have to wait and see, but seeing that e-book sales make up approximately 5% of all book sales in Australia at the moment, and considering that the kindle has been out for quite some time, I can’t see growth being big enough in that area to threaten bricks & mortar the way same way music has. Also, I think what hurt record stores more, was the piracy of music, which book piracy is not as a big an issue or as threatening (yet).

  • 10
    Simon Mansfield
    Posted Wednesday, 27 July 2011 at 4:13 pm | Permalink

    Wow what a value loaded article - on the one hand Matthia is happy to hand over hundreds if not thousands of dollars more a year to a local bookshop than would need be the case if purchased online, but then is not willing to spend a few hundred dollars extra on some quality bookshelves made from real wood that doesn’t sag or comes apart after a few years in Sydney’s heat and humidity as Ikea shelves invariably do.

    When you buy the a book from an online store or from a bookstore you get the exact same merchandise - or more often than not the hardcover version printed on quality paper if bought online from an overseas print run - rather than the junk our local publishing houses sell at double the price - meanwhile if you buy cheap bookshelves from Ikea you get junk pure and simple - whereas if you buy a slightly dearer one made from solid pine you get something of quality that will last 30 years or more.

    Seriously, if you want to care about the value chain and ensuring that local employment is kept strong - save money buying books online and use the saving to buy a quality bookshelf from a local shop made from local timbers, fashioned into a long lasting piece of furniture by a local tradesperson.

    If anything this article is an object lesson in the elitist values that so many on the Right side of politics bash us Lefties with day after day after day. But the real kicker is that it’s okay to have a protectionist racket in place to protect local publishers but it’s perfectly okay for a manufacturer like Ikea to flood the market with their crappy furniture that if the Dept of Fair Trading actually did it’s job would require that a sticker be placed on all Ikea products saying this product will most likely break and be unusable with two years. Moreover, local publishers should be required to place a sticker on their locally printed paperbacks saying this book will last no longer than 10 years before its binding dries out and the spine breaks when opened.

  • 11
    Jarod Collard
    Posted Wednesday, 27 July 2011 at 4:19 pm | Permalink

    Great article - thanks.

    I was in the music industry, which suffered exactly this situation over the past decade - now a huge number of independent stores have closed down. The sadness is the loss of community and culture these stores provided. While the producers and publishers spent fortunes bickering over music being pirated, they ignored the trends and never changed their business models - and the independent retail stores could no longer compete, a whole generational attitude change occurred while they sat playing the blame game.

    Because of this, “High Fidelity” situations no longer exist. The music industry did have other unique issues to contend with (which is why it happened sooner) but the future is looking much the same for all independent retail based business.

    The future (already well on it’s way) will be mass warehouse brand stores with overseas ownership, no customer loyalty, no community support and no soul. Welcome to globalisation - where even the largest Australian companies are piss-ants against direct international competition. Independents will always exist, but much in the way vinyl does compared to compact disc and now digital distribution.

  • 12
    freecountry
    Posted Wednesday, 27 July 2011 at 5:13 pm | Permalink

    I browse books without knowing what I’m looking for. Sometimes I’m after something in particular, but usually I’m just scanning for something to catch my interest. If the first page and a random page or two make me curious, we have a deal. The range of amazing books, authors and subjects that have opened up to me in this way, goes far beyond anything I ever could have discovered by any method less random, such as following the recommendations of others.

    Online shopping can never give me that. Oh, they try. Points for effort. But the heuristic algorithms of “other buyers who like what you like also liked …” leave me cold, and most of the online chats about books are narrowly stuck in genres, like non-fiction books of just the right political flavour, or novels about serial killers. (Did you ever read the one about the serial killer who starts stalking the profiler who can think like a serial killer?) I get the sense of bookreading communities frantically building echo chambers for themselves in which an author’s only means to success is success itself.

    Some people I know go online for the meat-and-vegies books when they know what they want, and make occasional forays into bookshops for variety. This is where Matthia’s point becomes crucial: such people need to understand that to a certain extent they are urinating in their own well, because the physical bookshops cannot long survive without the high volume meat-and-vegies titles.

    I do it the other way round, going online for a particular title only after I’ve given the bookshops every chance to supply it. This is pure self-interest on my part; I’m not interested in making any philanthropic donations for some book retailer’s sob story. But I do become poorer — quite literally poorer, in the sense that my money can no longer buy what it once could — every time I go back to an almost-forgotten bookshop I used to haunt, only to find that it’s dead and gone while my back was turned and a vitamin discount store has taken its place.

  • 13
    Politically Aroused
    Posted Wednesday, 27 July 2011 at 5:45 pm | Permalink

    That’s a lovely story, but nothing is going to change while bookstores have the gall to charge $45 for a book I can purchase online for $10.

  • 14
    AR
    Posted Wednesday, 27 July 2011 at 8:42 pm | Permalink

    When was the last time anyone went into a major chain bookshop and found a staff member who knew shit’bout shit, let alone akshally READ/B> books?
    A&R once had staff who at least knew where to find a book on the shelves rather than a vague wave at the shelves?

  • 15
    Andrew Ballem
    Posted Wednesday, 27 July 2011 at 9:19 pm | Permalink

    The bookshop is the least of the problems with pricing: the RRP of books in Australia can be double what it is in the UK. Quite often the Book Depository will still charge close to RRP (UK) for a paperback but you come out way ahead. This indicates to me that the Australian arms of the publishers are to blame, not the retailers.

  • 16
    Grant Regan
    Posted Wednesday, 27 July 2011 at 9:51 pm | Permalink

    Matthia, I commend you for looking to the attendant knock-on effects of making purchasing decisions based purely on price; the affect it has on community, on the local industry and on the writing as a craft but why are you know equally concerned about where you source your bookshelves from. The same considerations apply to furniture as they do to books or indeed any other ‘consumable’

    As Simon Mansfield stated if you’re genuinely serious about the ethics of the supply chain and fostering local employment thereby strengthening local community why are not equally choosing to support local craftspeople who invest many years into honing their craft, who invest a great deal of time, money and energy into fostering links with local suppliers of raw materials thus strengthening local supply chains and who take on apprentices. They equally contribute to the health of the local community as much as any local bookstore, perhaps more so. Why not support those who craft furniture not to be wealthy but for the very ethical considerations you’ve outlined?

    A book I would strongly recommend you reading is Richard Sennett’s ‘The Craftsman’ for a more nuanced appreciation of craft and for those who invest so much of their lives to their craft.

  • 17
    Posted Wednesday, 27 July 2011 at 10:27 pm | Permalink

    I also find it interesting that you can buy books published in Australia for half the price in the U.K. How can a book be published here (with the very high costs and pressures so often mentioned in the local industry), then shipped to the U.K., warehoused, inventoried, sold and shipped back here for half the price it would be at source?

    In any case, due to illness I am now unable to read paper books. There hasn’t been a bookshop in my entire region for many years. So what are my ethical choices?

    Ebooks from major publishers aren’t sold to us mangy Australians anyway. I quote HarperCollins, “We haven’t turned on any of our ebooks for Australia yet”. Yeah, I know: the statement is wildly inaccurate and ignorant of the facts, which is a fair representation of Agency 6 ebook-publishing currently.

    Ebooks.com in Perth won’t sell ebooks to us either. Most ebooks there are by default only available if you live in the U.S. So why bother having the site in Perth (Western Australia)?

    Ebooks we bought from Borders Online in an attempt to support our local bookshop have suddenly been shifted to Kobo in Canada. That wouldn’t matter if this were simply a global market, but we’re stuck behind the imposed glass walls of geolims, staring hungrily at all the ebooks we’re not allowed to buy, while being told we should be buying from our local bookshop.

    Who is that, again?

  • 18
    krissd6
    Posted Thursday, 28 July 2011 at 8:55 am | Permalink

    As an addicted reader and book purchaser I am sick of the willful ignorance being expressed by book retailers in Austraila. When i go into a shop which only stocks UK editions when I know that US editions are cheaper where is the incentive to buy. Where there is a US paperbook RRP $7.99 fo sale at $26.99 where is the incentive to buy. Until Australian book shops stock the best priced edition and then pvovide some parity with the Australian dollar I will continue to find alternatives. The same principles will apply as book retailers move into the download business if they continue to go with the overpriced UK editions then its priate bay for me.

  • 19
    freecountry
    Posted Thursday, 28 July 2011 at 9:18 am | Permalink

    KrissD6, my understanding is that’s out of the booksellers’ control.

    Industry insiders, please correct me if I’m wrong. UK publishers include all Australian and New Zealand rights in their standard contracts when buying the rights to a book for the UK market. They take their good time choosing a few low-risk bestsellers for Australiasia, which they believe to be a dumb outpost of civilization (in spite of the fact that Australasians are more literate and read more books than Brits). After some time limit elapses in which our colonial masters have declined to send a book to the sheep-shaggers at the bottom of the world, US publishers are allowed to send their editions (which are generally better quality, better designed, and cheaper) but by then all the marketing and reviews of the book are last year’s news so there’s little point in doing so.

    Protectionist laws in Australia attempt to remedy this problem by giving the local publishers first printing option, before those rights pass by default to our old colonial masters. But the Australian publishers are just as lazy and condescending as the British ones, so they usually just sit on their first printing rights until they expire, in the hope that Australian readers will give up overseas books and settle for whatever dreary literary exercise in self-flagellation is being called a must-read in the Fairfax papers that month.

    You can’t blame the book retailer for that.

  • 20
    Jean
    Posted Thursday, 28 July 2011 at 10:30 am | Permalink

    I don’t have an opinion on this article in stock, but I can get one in for you.

  • 21
    Shane Nixon
    Posted Thursday, 28 July 2011 at 10:39 am | Permalink

    I have a vested interest in not been gouged at the checkout and that is why I buy books from on-line retailers.

    IF the book is a locally published Australian publisher and Australian author I will go out of my way to purchase locally. I will even buy foreign authors published by some of the local indie publishers. I will not buy, for example, a locally published Stephen King just because the publisher is big enough to do a local print run too. It will cost 20% to 100% more than importing anyway.

  • 22
    RamaStar
    Posted Thursday, 28 July 2011 at 11:31 am | Permalink

    @Shane Nixon
    Maybe, but as put in article, it’s those print runs of overseas books that allows Australian publishers to invest in and publish Austrailan authors who’s sales won’t cover the expense of publishing them. For example, without doing print runs of Lord Archer, publishers wouldn’t have the money to gamble on Matthew Riley.

  • 23
    Captain Planet
    Posted Thursday, 28 July 2011 at 11:48 am | Permalink

    Appealing to the buyer’s altruism to encourage the buyer to spend considerably more money on a local product is a highly unreliable business plan.

    Purchasers have an extremely poor track record of opting for local products at a higher price than imported products, even when the quality of the local product is significantly better than that of the imported product. To suggest that a local industry which produces a poorer quality product at a higher price than imported alternatives, can be saved by well - meaning purchasers being willing to voluntarily pay a premium price for a crap product, in order to nostalgically prop up a blatantly uncompetitive local industry, is a serious exercise in wishful thinking.

  • 24
    freecountry
    Posted Thursday, 28 July 2011 at 12:11 pm | Permalink

    Ramastar - Maybe, but they do so by using the parallel import law to handicap the overseas competition.

    Overseas publishers have to wait until 30 days after a book has been published elsewhere before they even know if any Australian publisher will exercise its local cartel option. Of course, Australian publishers don’t inform the overseas rights holder whether they’re interested, they just wait for it to expire. Until that happens, the overseas publisher can’t risk all the advance logistics and marketing to prepare for an Australian release. It will be months before the book can appear in Australian bookshops, and by then the moment has passed, the book reviews are forgotten and the literary world has moved on, and there’s little point in the book appearing here at all. Especially when shoppers can go online and avoid the local publishing cartel pricing, as well as GST, local marketing expenses, and the risk premium of shipping an exotic title to Australia.

    Protectionists always have someone to hold hostage in the public eye to justify kneecapping their overseas competitors in this way. According to Australian publishers, local authors and local culture will be ruined if they are no longer able to us the parallel import rule to limit our reading choices in this way. Our government seems to think that’s a small price to pay.

  • 25
    freecountry
    Posted Thursday, 28 July 2011 at 12:19 pm | Permalink

    http://www.alia.org.au/advocacy/copyright/your.ques.answered.html

  • 26
    Shane Nixon
    Posted Thursday, 28 July 2011 at 1:12 pm | Permalink

    Ebooks are another example of the cartel at work. Anybody wonder why the take up of eBooks is so low in Australia? Because half the titles on Kindle, for example, aren’t available to Australians. A little while ago I tried to get an eBook version of a best selling Australian author. The Kindle version was about 7.99 but it wasn’t available to Australians. I finally managed to wade deep into the Australian publishers website to find an E version available that was about the same price as trade paperback or the hardcover. Now why would I jump through hoops to pay an extortionate amount for something that is available elsewhere for 1/4 the price?

    Something is rotten in the Australian (big) publishing industry. I don’t have a problem with Aussie small press, and as I mentioned earlier, I go out of my way to buy direct from them.

    And really? As a consumer I should have the honour of paying 2, 3, 4 or 5 times as much just so the Aussie publisher can find and make millions off the the next Matthew Riley? Maybe the publishers should apply for charity status so we can get a tax deduction book purchases.

    Then there is the publisher’s lament at just how tiny the Australian market is. Apparently we turn over about 30% of what the UK does - about AU$1.4 billion in 2010 (UK was about AU$4.4 billion). That doesn’t suggest as tiny a market as what we’re lead to believe.

  • 27
    RamaStar
    Posted Thursday, 28 July 2011 at 2:13 pm | Permalink

    Freecountry.

    Your premise rest on the fact that retailers will drop their prices for books imported from overseas. Book retailers may import cheaper books yet not pass on the savings to the consumer and take more profit from themselves. Considering that on firm sale from publishers, retailers get up to 50% of RRP anyway and don

  • 28
    RamaStar
    Posted Thursday, 28 July 2011 at 2:13 pm | Permalink

    My post seemed to get cut off

    Considering that on firm sale from publishers, retailers get up to 50% of RRP anyway and don’t pass that onto consumers, there is no evidence to suggest that lifting the rights will improve the cost of books. Also considering the coalition pushing for the lift of the important rights is made up of major chain retailers (Woolworths et. al), they’ll use the lift to fatten their profit margins at the expense of local publishers and local authors.

    Again
    “assumption that so long as prices are getting lower the consumer must be benefiting is a pretty naive one.” Market efficiency comes from asymmetric information, not from the cheapest price. An market that is the cheapest can still be an inefficient market.

    Also, where is this notion that Publisher are gluttonous and making ‘millions’ off consumer bucks. Publisher profits (if the make profit) are paper thin. Many publishers, including Penguin, & Harper Collins have been laying off staff and implement hiring freezes. It’s amazing this ‘publishers are the problem’ attitude. Yes they need to evolve, and charging eBook version at trade paperback price is ridiculous, but the state of the industry is hardly because of millionaire publishers kicking back in swimming pools of your hard earned. (and no I don’t work for a publisher, or even in the industry, I just take note of all the information)

  • 29
    freecountry
    Posted Thursday, 28 July 2011 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

    Ramastar - How much mark-up business people charge on goods is a function of various things, including how much competition they face. It’s got nothing to do with whether they go to church, have haloes around their heads, or vote for progressive parties. If a business has to choose between dropping its prices or being undercut, it will drop prices if it can afford to do so.

    If you read the Australian Library and Information Association link I posted above, they draw on the Productivity Commission report to explain why the parallel import law results mainly in overcharging Australian consumers for books. That’s less choice, for higher prices, and most of the excess prices go to foreign publishers anyway. The PC report explains this in detail, but essentially we’re ripped off by legislative barriers to entry, giving us less competition, less choice, and higher prices.

    By the way, ALIA is not in the book selling business; it is made up of librarians, who are book buyers, who want more choice for less price like the rest of us. It’s worth having a read of what they say and what the PC said.

  • 30
    Smithee
    Posted Thursday, 28 July 2011 at 10:12 pm | Permalink

    The main thing Matthia Dempsey needs is a good sub-editor. Twice as much has been said in half as many words. And I suppose she does own a computer? The old cliche about “personal serice and reviews” is bollocks: you get much better reviews and in-depth discussions on any number of interantional forums.

    She’s closest to the mark when she says she has a vested interest in the industry. Well stuff ‘em I say. They’ve gouged us for years and now it’s too late to make friends. I buy all my books overseas and couldn’t be happier.

    Unlike the author of this piece, I buy books for the actual book, not all the social palaver and worthy causes that are tacked on like toys-in-the-cereal-box.

  • 31
    Bellistner
    Posted Friday, 29 July 2011 at 11:13 am | Permalink

    Another thing to chew on: one of the arguments above is that we need to keep buying books locally so that publishers can use the cream off the top to ‘take chances’ on unknown authors. Well, the phenomenon of print-on-demand sets this to rights. Authors can now write their book, and list it with a PoD website. Buyers can then buy a single copy of the book, which then gets printed, boxed up, and mailed off to them, for still less then the cost of a book in a traditional bookstore, because there’s no *cough*value-adding*cough* middlemen to pay salaries to. Author wins, website wins, buyer wins, high-overhead retail loses, high-overhead publishers lose.

  • 32
    RamaStar
    Posted Friday, 29 July 2011 at 11:45 am | Permalink

    Bellistner

    “because there’s no *cough*value-adding*cough* middlemen to pay salaries to. Author wins, website wins, buyer wins, high-overhead retail loses, high-overhead publishers lose.”

    Not really. Authors aren’t editors, they’re writing and story structuring can be appalling. I’ve read manuscripts from authors, and even from the established authors, and they are awful, riddeled with plot inconsistencies, grammar, punctuation and spelling mistakes.

    If books were published straight from the Author into the consumer the quality would be shocking, and consumers would be worse off. If you think that books now contain say 3-9 errors in it, after a copy-edit, a proof read and a structural edit by fully trained and experienced professionals, imagine how bad the final product will be without that process. There is a lot of value add done by the “middlemen”. This in a way comes back to market efficiency, the whole ‘lemon concept –used car theory’ that cheapest isn’t better. If consumers know they’ll be getting a bad product, even if it’s cheap, they’ll stop buying leading to market failure. Publishers in a way are provide the asymmetric information needed to create an efficient market. As they will not publish crap written by anyone who thinks they can write.

  • 33
    jonathan mallalieu
    Posted Friday, 29 July 2011 at 5:10 pm | Permalink

    The success of Amazon & Book Depository proves that book buying is not dead, and they succeed because they stock New Books AND Used Books.
    Most bricks and mortar booksellers only do one OR the other.
    Bad business model. The snobbery of new book selling is killing them.
    Combining New Book stock with Used Book stock (and antiquarian) is a good sustainable model, ethically and economically too.
    Buying books back off people they no longer use and selling them, and abandoning the old wasteful model of endlessly displaying new titles, most of them mediocre, would free them from the struggle.
    In the USA, Half-Price Books is a chain that thrives and each store has a very local feel. Australia could benefit from similar ‘half price bookstores’ (where new and used books are sold at half the cover price, dvds and cds too).

  • 34
    Hawkwind
    Posted Friday, 29 July 2011 at 6:17 pm | Permalink

    I have worked in retail for the past decade, most of that time in specialist shops - books and otherwise.

    I will not disagree with anyone who states that changes need to be made in the Australian publishing industry - books are often too expensive in this country through the local publishers and distributors. But for those of you who believe we can match the cost of overseas books - it’s just not going to happen.

    An average discount from a US distributor is 40% to a retail store, whether it’s in the US or Australia doesn’t matter. Freight is about $6.50 per kg. So, if a store buys a book that has a $10 RRP in the US, it costs $6. If it weighs 300 g (not unusual), the cost is now about $8. Then there’s GST, so now it’s nearly $9. So it’s almost the same cost to land it in Australia as the RRP in the US.

    Now you have to add the local expenses. Wages in Australia are expensive - retail assistants in Australia get paid around $18-20 per hour, those in the US get paid $7-8 per hour, so that’s 2 1/2 times the cost. Retail rent is incredibly expensive, particularly in Sydney and Melbourne. Cost of living in Australia is higher than most places in the world. And the store owner, well he probably wants to make some money also. So, in order to get the same benefit that a US store owner gets by selling the book at $10, the Australian store owner has to sell it at $18.

    So for those of you wondering why a book in Australia is nearly twice the price that it is overseas, there’s your answer.

  • 35
    Bob the builder
    Posted Friday, 29 July 2011 at 7:39 pm | Permalink

    No mention in the article about the feelings of local furniture-makers. Another demonstration of how narrow self- (or industry-) interest harms us all. If you don’t care about furniture-makers, why do you expect anyone to care about bookshop owners?

  • 36
    Bellistner
    Posted Saturday, 30 July 2011 at 6:25 am | Permalink

    RamaStar, I accept the requirement for proof-readers and editors (although having them does not, of course guarantee a good book. Kim Stanley Robinson would have been well advised to discontinue work on Antartica well before it got to the publishing stage). I was referring to the layers of people like managers and “talent scouts”.
    That said, you can also hire proof-readers etc on the net as well. :)

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...