Over to you, Combet
|
“Just before the Mexican dawn on Saturday, the UN got its mojo back in guiding global action on pollution and climate change,” writes the Climate Institute’s Erwin Jackson in Crikey today.
Rooted blogger Phillip Ireland captured the moment on tape: But what exactly were the delegates cheering, especially given some of the headlines coming out of the talks don’t amount to much more than an underwhelmed yawn? This was all about process, writes Giles Parkinson in Climate Spectator — about patching up the process of multilateral talks and setting new building blocks for a legally binding treaty. In short, meeting a set of pretty low expectations, care of Copenhagen. The Cancun talks produced a formal UN decision anchoring pollution limitation and reduction targets covering more than 80% of global emissions — the first time the US together with China and all other major emitters have anchored their national pollution targets in a formal UN agreement. This is significant. But it comes with a dozen different qualifiers, one being that the targets do not add up to a safe upper limit level of warming. So what’s next? Having “saved the process,” writes Parkinson, “the task remains to come up with an agreement to save the planet, or at least the things that live on it.” The best way Australia can hope to help in this progress? The same old same old. A carbon price. After all, writes Jackson today, “Without a domestic pollution limit and price Australia will not be in a position to fulfill the commitments made in Cancun. Without a domestic pollution price Australia will continue to be out-competed by countries dominating the emerging low pollution economy.” Climate change minister Greg Combet reportedly impressed in talks in Cancun. Now it’s all eyes on him to see if he can get this over the line. |
|
|
|









One Comment
The Games are over, let the action begin — - perhaps?