tip off

That other former Labor leader…

He’s feisty, he’s a pugilist, a former Labor leader and he lives, mainly, in his own political past.

No, we’re not talking about Mark Latham. The most exciting ex-leader in Australia is Paul Keating, and he’s at it again today, defending himself against, of all people, his former speechwriter.

Keating’s subject de jour is his famous 1992 Redfern speech about the misdeeds perpetrated against aboriginals. He has written an entire op-ed in The Age to “make clear Watson was not the author of the speech”, accusing him of attempting to take credit for the oration.

In July, the target of Keating’s elegant vitriol was Bob Hawke, about whom he wrote:

The fact is, Bob, I was exceedingly kind to you for a very long time. I knew the state you were in in 1984 and notwithstanding a lot of unhelpful advice from Garnaut and other obsequious members of your staff, I carried you through the whole 1984-1987 parliament, insisting you look like the prime minister, even if your staff, the Manchu Court I called them, were otherwise prepared to leave you in your emotional hole. No other prime minister would have survived going missing for that long. But with my help, you were able to.”

So much talent, so much anger, so many recriminations.

When he presses the button to vaudeville, there’s no-one on the political stage quite like Keating. If only he could devote even a small portion of that intellectual prowess to current or important issues, rather than spending his time slagging off at his former colleagues.

5
  • 1
    mark
    Posted Thursday, 26 August 2010 at 1:25 pm | Permalink

    Dont understand why do you attack Paul on this one. In both situations he was responding to the other’s public utterances.

    And he is quite right to say that it is the person who has attained the public position and then stakes that position on giving voice to a particular stance that should rightly get any bouquets just as they get the brickbats. I’m sure Watson writes a good line but he is a backroom boy and that’s where he should stay.

  • 2
    Posted Thursday, 26 August 2010 at 1:27 pm | Permalink

    Well, actually, he does, doesn’t he?

    Urban planning in Sydney would be one.

    Privacy laws another.

    I’m sure there must be others.

  • 3
    Dr Rapunzel
    Posted Thursday, 26 August 2010 at 3:36 pm | Permalink

    Is Crikey suggesting that Paul Keating is less entitled than anyone else to correct perceived inaccuracies in reporting about his time in office because of his personality? Why is that? Surely not because he is feisty, articulate and unapologetic? Damn, an Australian public figure who refuses to fake humility. Unforgiveable.

    History is ultimately created/written from analysis of the public record and what is available of private records, so Mr Keating is forced respond to “the public utterances” ( thanks Mark) that he disagrees with, or contests. If he does not respond he would effectively be endorsing what he considers inaccurate reports. I think in debating this is known as rebuttal.

  • 4
    cairns50
    Posted Thursday, 26 August 2010 at 5:31 pm | Permalink

    mr sole subscriber, do not you understand that paul keating is not an elected person any more

    so if he were to start commenting on the issues of the day im sure crikey, not long after the bastards at news limited, they would surely be first, would be one of the news organisations to tell him to shut up

    what mr keating is doing, and what he is entitled to do, is to challenge those who lie or try to besmirch his legacy as a truly great australian prime minister

  • 5
    Truth hurts
    Posted Friday, 27 August 2010 at 9:28 am | Permalink

    Yeah, but you know, Paul Keating is right…..

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...