The blogger banned from parliament … Nine’s live — from the carpark
|
Whistleblower’s blog banned. Rob McKibbin has been a “workplace bully and corruption whistleblower” in South Australia for ten years. His 5000-hits-a-day blog has kept the South Australian government honest over the last year, but it seems the powers that be might have had enough. On Monday McKibbin got word that his many followers within South Australia’s parliament house couldn’t get access to the blog, instead getting the error message “Unable to connect to destination. Reason: This Category: Blogs and Personal Sites”. A spokesperson for the SA Parliamentary Network Support Group (PNSG) told Crikey that McKibbin’s site was not the only site blocked, with parliament house workers restricted from accessing all Blogspot blogs. McKibbin remains convinced the ban was enacted as a result of his most recent post, a rather scathing attack on new SA attorney-general, John Rau. Access to McKibbin’s blog has been restored after an independent member of SA’s upper house, Ann Bressington, campaigned for access. An internal email sent to Ann Bressington from the PNSG explained that access to other Blogspot blogs would still be blocked. — Crikey intern Matt de Neef Nine News — live from the car park. On Monday we pointed out how Channel Nine was reporting on the Bangkok riots from Brisbane — outside its own barbed wire-fenced studios, in fact. Well it didn’t take long for Channel Seven to make hay, contrasting its own on-the-ground reporting with its bitter rival — “IN CHANNEL 9 CARPARK”. The Age’s confusion at phone-cancer link. The Age recently reported that “A major international study has been unable to rule out links between mobile phone use and brain tumours.” And yet the following day, The Age declared “The largest study into the risks of mobile phone use has shown no significant evidence of a link to brain cancer”. If you search for “mobile phones” on the site, the difference in headlines becomes even more apparent. They are linked with the bylines “Mobile phones linked to brain cancer risk” and “Cancer study finds no clear link to mobile phone use” respectively. Both stories include the same video. The question is: which should we believe? — serial commenter Halo Jones
The 200 moments that changed journalism
Syria and Israel turn to bloggers to advance peace talks
Mediagazer’s top 100 media news sites
A peek behind the UK Times paywall
Google ordered to destroy Wi-Fi data
Yahoo! acquires Associated Content
Is CNN’s Bangkok coverage biased?
Twitter not for sale
|
|
|
|









2 Comments
PNSG blocking Blogger sites would be more about stopping staff members from doing their own blogs on company time, so to speak.
I know quite a few political staffers and many have their own blogs and, trust me, most of the work on them is done at work, rather than at home.
In the past PNSG also blocked access to Facebook, Twitter, My Space and other non workd-related sites. They have had to restore access in every case because of protest from the pollies - who also use “company time” to do this sort of social networking.
CHINDA63. Yeah. These I acknowledge. And having been in ICT management for close to 30 years, I understand. What took ME by surprise, though, was that up until last Friday, the day I decided to include all members of the ruling Labor Party to my circulation list, my Blog was accessible. Monday morning it was not. And from docs I have sourced, I firmly reject the notion of being part of some big picture filtering extravaganza that simply coincided with my usual regular mailout. The story now being told by the PNSG does not match the reality. Hell, I can just download as HTML and attach to the email. Still get the Post out there.