Abbott’s mate on Q&A … are Age readers big prudes?
|
Q&A watch. As a public service, Crikey will each week subject questioners on ABC1’s Monday night gabfest Q&A to a rigorous Googling. This week’s winner is Kieran Morris, who threw a suspicious Dorothy Dixer Tony Abbott’s way from the Ultimo back benches: TONY JONES: We’re going to go to Kieran Morris at the back. Abbott answered by claiming Labor’s “compassionate” approach to boat people had created a “product” for people smugglers to infiltrate the Australian mainland. Working beautifully, especially when some casual research reveals Kieran is not only committed supporter of NSW upper house hardliner David Clarke, but also runs the Tony Abbott Appreciation Society on Facebook. Morris has previously taken a special interest in Abbott’s stance on population policy, posting his hearty congratulations over his party’s apparent commitment to “stand up to boat people”. Not surprisingly, Kieran’s Facebook profile includes a cosy picture of himself and his hero arm in arm. In the wake of the debacle over Kevin Rudd’s grilling at the hands of undeclared Young Lib Angela Samuels, Q&A management reportedly launched a valiant attempt to weed out partisan hacks from its studio audience. But last night wasn’t Kieran’s first appearance on Q&A. Last August, he appeared in the audience to lob a question at Christopher Pyne over the left’s “hypocrisy” on Stern Hu, channeling a line trotted out by Julie Bishop just days before. — Andrew Crook Are Age readers more conservative than SMH readers? The debate over the sale of soft porn continues, after a group of child advocates, psychologists, academics and other experts called for a ban on its sale in newsagents and supermarkets. Two Fairfax websites polled their readers on the issue, but with rather different results. On The Age website, 48% of respondents agreed that ‘soft’ porn should be banned from sale in newsagents, milk bars and service stations. A similar poll on the SMH portal found only 32% of respondents would support a ban. — Crikey intern Elizabeth Redman Finally, the iPad launches. More than 300,000 iPads have been sold on the device’s first day on the market, the New York Times reported. But analysts expected this figure would be even higher:
The first reviews are mixed. The Wall Street Journal’s Walt Mossberg points out the iPad isn’t for everyone: “My verdict is that, while it has compromises and drawbacks, the iPad can indeed replace a laptop for most data communication, content consumption and even limited content creation, a lot of the time. But it all depends on how you use your computer.” Meanwhile, Silicon Alley Insider praised the design: “The display is incredibly beautiful, and both text and graphics look very nice on it. Web pages are fun to zoom around. It’s zippy. And the battery life is more than enough. The iPad user interface — in some senses, a sized-up version of the iPhone, but with new techniques — was really done well. The natural textures, which grace the UI in a few places, are a nice touch.” — Elizabeth Redman ABC staff use lego for team-building exercise
Will Twitter replace the White House journalists?
AP tells staff: we’re investing in investigative journalism
How to deal with information overload
Surfing journalism not just about dreams
|
|
|
|









6 Comments
Something else “funny”, how many questions were posed by people that didn’t appear to be introduced, but whose christian names Abbott seemed to know when he answered?
What is it with Rudd? You need to play the game hard. Cleaning out the rightards from the ABC should have been the first job on the agenda. What a sorry bunch of arse lickers we have as reporters in the ABC these days. Just start crying rightwing bias, it worked wonders for the rightards. Never forget untruths have a conservative bias.
The facts smash rightards, stop pussy footing around. Hit’em loud and hard as bullies should be and watch’em run home to mum.
I thought Abbott was fiddling with a worm control in his pocket, anally connected to the Rent-a-clap army on the front row.
@Phil - I’m intrigued by your comment that “untruths have a conservative bias”. Please explain.
These planted hacks, no matter from which side, don’t do their side or leader any favours by engaging in these “praise my supported leader by denigrating the opposing leader” tactics.
Kieran Morris would have been more effectual asking Tony Abbott for detail on his immigration policy rather than throwing in a Dorothy Dixer in a lame attempt to put down Kevin Rudd on asylum seekers. All this line of questioning did was further frame Abbott as being all negative with nothing positive to contribute, especially in the light of the public being far more informed on boat people than they were in the days of Howard’s demonisation by keeping them faceless days. In other words the scaremongering on them is mostly ineffectual so the Dorothy Dixer by Kieran was more a minus for Abbot than a plus.
Kate, Study the known and provable facts on just about any topic and you’ll find it’s not the conservatives pushing that position.
A great example is religion and morals. An honest study of this topic will lead you to the fact that religion gets it’s morals from humans (the good ones that is) not humans get their morals from religion.
“Reality has a liberal bias”, that’s why conservatives fight so hard to keep the truth hidden and their constant efforts to rewrite history whenever they gain power.
My twist on the saying is because here in Australia we have an excellent example of what I ‘am writing about.
Why is it that the conservatives hide behind the untruthful tag as liberals?