tip off

Bloody-minded promises in Bangkok’s sea of red

On Monday two Thai Army personnel were injured by 4 M79 grenades fired at camp on the outskirts of Bangkok, though no political motive has been ascribed yet. Red Shirt leader Jatuphon Promphan told the Thai government the demonstrators will spill their blood tomorrow — a gesture to seek the dissolution of the current government, which they regard as illegitimate.

However, the Red Shirts have pledged a peaceful demonstration, and do not intend a World War I-style “blood sacrifice” by hurling themselves in some suicidal assault on the Thai security forces. As Crikey went to press, at about 8am Thailand time, some of the estimated 10,0000-plus protesters will give blood to a 1000-litre “donation”, which the Reds intend to throw all over Government House if the current administration refuses accede to their demands.

There will be blood, then, as the government is refusing to budge, saying only it will listen to the demonstrators’ demands, and so long as the demonstration is peaceful will not use force against it.

How long can the Red Shirts keep going? On Monday morning, I hitched a ride with the demonstrators from central Bangkok, where the Reds have been gathering since Friday night, to the army barracks where the PM is holed-up.

I haven’t slept properly in four nights, and haven’t washed for five days,” said Naran, a 63-year-old farmer from the Isaan region in the north-east. Nonetheless he was up and on the road early Monday morning, as the rally made the slow trek through extra-heavy Bangkok traffic to the army barracks to hear Jatuphon make his blood pledge.

Temperatures reach the mid-30s by mid-morning, and hold at that until well into the evening, so the demonstrators might soon get fatigued even if they are used to the hot sun on their farms. “I have just this set of clothes with me,” added Chanchai, who clung to a Thai flag festooned across the back of the Toyota pick-up, all the way out to the army barracks.

Until Monday’s sanguine (to use the old definition of the word) outburst and grenade attack, the high political stakes largely belied what has been a carnival atmosphere so far. Though some of the rhetoric from the Red shirt leaders has been as spicy as the Thai snacks being cooked all along Bangkok’s Ratchadamnoen Avenue.

Not least that used by Thaksin Shinawatra, the exiled former PM who has been charged with corruption, but remains a hero to many Red Shirts. He phoned in to the rally late Sunday evening, calling the current PM Abhisit Vejajjiva “a child”, according to a translation given to me by a Thai colleague, adding the Reds were there to protest the anti-democratic way Thailand is run.

He told them to keep it peaceful, but as the poet put it, will blood lead to blood?

4
  • 1
    Jean
    Posted Tuesday, 16 March 2010 at 2:47 pm | Permalink

    Not sure who is spinning the international media on this story, but someone is doing a great job.
    TV reports, every press mention I have seen, talk about “anti-government demonstrators”, which implies to me that these are dangerous folks, who really should do what Thailand’s military-backed government tells them to, and stop complaining.

    Just for fun, how about replacing the phrase “anti-government demonstrators” with “pro-democracy activists” ?

  • 2
    Bogdanovist
    Posted Tuesday, 16 March 2010 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

    Jean, I don’t profess to know very much about Thai politics, but I do remember recently that the ‘yellow shirts’ held a large disruptive protest of there own. They would also claim to be ‘pro-democracy activists’ even if they are supports of the current (elected) government.

    anti-government demonstrators” is a neutral and descriptive term, whereas pro-democracy would not be.

    As I say, I have no idea or opinion about whether the current government is more or less democratic or corrupt than Thaksin Shinawatra’s was. You clearly seem to, but then to phrase it the way you want would require the media to spin it the way you want.

  • 3
    klewso
    Posted Tuesday, 16 March 2010 at 4:11 pm | Permalink

    What did Shinawatra, in his position, with all his “accumulated” wealth, ever do for the rural poor and less educated, that he’s now using to disrupt the country, so he can get back in?
    And what did he do with the proceeds from the sale of the countries “telstra” to a foreign entity but pocket the procedes or channel them to his family? And there was the list of his institutionalised nepotism.
    Hasn’t he been found guilty of a crime by the courts of Thailand? Besides the feezing of assets, isn’t there 2 years to be served in the poky, “when he comes back home”?
    He wants to get back because he “forgot” something?

  • 4
    green-orange
    Posted Tuesday, 16 March 2010 at 5:09 pm | Permalink

    No, the current government was not ‘elected’, it was installed by the King.

    Yes, there was a large, rowdy and violent demostration by the ‘yellow shirts’, yet the army didn’t arrest any of them, only a few ‘red shirts’ who were attacked - funny that !

Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...