Obama in danger of Hoovering the economy

As the US teeters on the brink of a truly great depression, one that may engulf the world, it is time to be brutal. We can see the shape history is taking  — it is to steal from Marx and Twain, both repeating and rhyming. The ringmasters of Obama’s economic policy must  — to paraphrase Cromwell  — go, in the name of God, go. For the ghost of Hoover hovers.

Obama, who might have been a towering President, a Lincoln, or a Roosevelt, is becoming another Hoover incapable of turning from the advice of the money masters.

While the great presidents decided and enforced their decisions on a fractious land, Obama is the ultimate victim of regulatory capture and increasingly a physical target for those millions of white Americans who never accepted their President.

Obama’s first and immediate problem is the role of the three worldly wise men  — Geithner, Summers and Bernanke  — who have moulded the man to be the tool of the Too big To Fail entities that have come to rule Washington from Wall Street.

This is a clear and present danger to the Democratic Party’s hold on the House next year. It is also an element of the threat to the President himself and by that I mean his life.

Obama is 47. He was 22 when Reagan took office. Just checking his age, I stumbled over theories that had me wondering if he was born and suckled by Joseph Stalin and parachuted into Cuba as a child and swears daily to bequeath his office to the militant feminist wing of the Black Panther. Obama hate is so evident that it is palpable. And this lunatic fringe is up in arms because a people that have never been told No! are now being held to ransom by complicated forces that can be, in the minds of millions, directed at Obama personally.

The trap the economists surround the policymakers with is so complete that there is almost a scientific certainty to it. Train an economist to be a thief and they won’t leave a soup spoon. They take the lot. They do so by reversing logic, maths and sense. Marx sure got the downside of capital right when he said theft is the first stage thereof. Now, as the US borrows, begs and tries to burrow from the hole it has so completely constructed, President Obama now finds he is caught in the grasp of history when it is grasping as never before. The nightmare mounts.

There are 50 million Americans on food stamps. I remember seeing my first food stamp and had lived in the US for months. That was under Bush 1.

Permanent, vast unemployment levels currently above 17% and sure to go to the twenties.

A thoroughly corrupt financial system that has its tentacles throughout every tiny rat hole in his administration  — and everywhere else between the beltways and avenues of Washington-Wall Street.

Billions more government handouts needed immediately to keep some sort of pretence of a single green shoot.

Afghanistan, Pakistan, China, the Middle East …

Then you get into the tricky bits. And yesterday Obama faced reducing the deficit or reducing more of the workforce. Guess who got reduced.

He fears a double-dip recession will occur if foreigners lose confidence in the US dollar, causing interest rates to spike,” an observer said, exactly explaining what he fears. Oh for the President that feared fear.

But we are way beyond that.

Obama told us in an interview with the hated Fox News, an organisation dedicated to his destruction by foul means preferably:

I think it is important though to recognise that, if we keep on adding to the deficit  — even in the midst of this recovery  — that at some point people could lose confidence in the US economy in a way that could actually lead to a double-dip recession.”

Pure Hoover?

Obama doesn’t seem to understand how the economy works. Reducing deficits by cutting spending decreases demand. This will, as it did for Roosevelt in 1937, induce a double-dip recession. The forces that wish Obama ill will be even more powerful as the US dips deeper into the economic morass.

Fact is this is a sure way into a double-dip depression, which merely extends the one the US is in to the one it is about to enter. Now, as the economic judgement mounts and the inevitability of decline is so apparent that the US enemies are taking tap-dancing lesson, some men must go.

Yesterday, at last a muttering of discontent from Oregon congressman Peter Defazio, demanding Geithner and Summers be dismissed and saying dissent in the progressive section of the party is acute. All members looking at re-election next year are getting the same feed from their base. Defazio has merely brought this out into the open.

For if Obama were to fire Summers and Giethner and allow Bernanke  — when his term expires next year  — to move on, he might just save his nation and his presidency.

There was a time when national security had the first ear of the President but now that is the case with the economy for they are one and the same. Perhaps Obama never realised what being President of the United States was all about.

He had served a mere four years in the Senate while Bush junior was president. It is a meagre background with almost no economic experience. His adult political life included eight balmy years when Clinton revived America. The next eight was the train wreck of the Bush 43 presidency.

From inauguration things might have looked simple enough. Responsible attentive government could reverse the effects of the Bush follies just as Clinton did with those of his Bush’s father and Reagan. Obama is young and inexperienced but compared with Bush he is almost an elder statesman.

Youth and inexperience didn’t matter for Bush because Bush never doubted himself. Bereft of intellectual curiosity he decided on actions and then never doubted them no matter how insane their application. He made sure that all around him agreed with even the most noxious criminal scheme and malcontents met Karl Rove with his baseball bat. Bush ruled. Cheney implemented but Bush had his way. He was never a victim of regulatory capture  — he captured.

But as America tries to comprehend the end of its economic supremacy, forces dangerous to the life of the President are being unleashed across the land. Unwittingly, I assume, some US TV station is running “pray for Obama” ads that cite Psalm 109:8 but do not quote the verse.

Psalm 109:8, which is appearing on bumper stickers and T-shirts across the land is one more in a long line of coded Obama death threats. The verse in question reads: “May his days be few; may another take his place of leadership.” That leads fairly naturally into the Psalm 109:9, “May his children be fatherless, and his wife a widow.” Obama’s heroes’ wives did become widows.

I pray his day be long in the land but that does not extend to those who have led him in his path of uncertainty into the valley of the shadow of death. By that I mean his three economic chiefs. But these veiled death threats are real and present dangers.

Yesterday Rachel Maddow asked Patience With God author and Huffington Post blogger Frank Schaeffer to explain whether or not the citation of this Biblical text “means something less threatening to people hearing this in a Biblical context.” Schaeffer replied:

No. Actually, it means something more threatening. I think that the situation that I find genuinely frightening right now is that you have a ramping up of Biblical language, language from the anti-abortion movement, for instance, death panels and this sort of thing, and what it’s coalescing into is branding Obama as Hitler, as they have already called him. And something foreign to our shores, we’re reminded of that, he’s born in Kenya. As brown, as black, above all, as not us.

He is, as Sarah Palin’s said, “not a real American”. But now, it turns out, he joins the ranks of the unjust kings of ancient Israel, unjust rulers to which all these Biblical allusions are directed who should be slaughtered, if not by God, then by just men. So there’s a parallel here with Timothy McVeigh’s T-shirt on the day of the Oklahoma City bombing. He said the tree of liberty had to be watered by the blood of tyrants.

That quote, we saw at a meeting where Obama was present, was carried on a placard by someone with a loaded weapon.

The economy will, with a double-dip, deliver the angry, ugly American a victim and a target and add millions to those that see their only power as coming from the barrel of a gun.

Obama must dismiss his economic advisers and look further afield to the many that have so reasonably yet forcefully advocated policies for all Americans. He must talk to his people and explain what has happened. Millions will remain armed and angry but many will turn from the false gods that would, and are, turning this young man into a monster intent on destroying America. Those who must be hurled out of the White House and public affairs.

Obama knows their names and addresses. If he asks his party faithful, they will support him in a course that will transform his policies before time runs out. If it hasn’t already.


12 Comments

  1. Mr Denmore
    Posted Friday, 20 November 2009 at 2:05 pm | Permalink

    Terrifying. What a basket case of a country. It’s medieval. I’m not sure about the author’s claim, though, that there is better economic advice than Obama is currently receiving. The fact is he has little choice. What was he supposed to do - let Citigroup and JP Morgan go under with all the rest?? You think Lehman was bad?? That truly would have been financial armageddon.

    The great irony is that Obama is being branded a socialist for helping bankers, the archest of arch-capitalists. And most of the mess occured during the watch of that great beacon of competence and righteousness, George Dubya. What exactly DO these people want?

    Clearly they are raging against the dying light. But their mad incoherence, their end-of-days paranoia and their threatening references to Biblical tests are truly scarey - as scarey as the mad mullahs of the Taliban. Where are the voices of sanity and reason and moderation in the USA?

  2. Mark Duffett
    Posted Friday, 20 November 2009 at 2:09 pm | Permalink

    I got chills reading this, and I don’t think it was the iced coffee.

  3. Lee Wilkinson
    Posted Friday, 20 November 2009 at 2:23 pm | Permalink

    What a bunch of incoherent ramblings, I’d expect this from the neo-con religious right wing rather than Crikey.

  4. Posted Friday, 20 November 2009 at 2:42 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, I’m with @LEE WILKINSON… come on Crikey, don’t you have any standards?

  5. fleury
    Posted Friday, 20 November 2009 at 2:55 pm | Permalink

    Errr, righto.

  6. Lucy
    Posted Friday, 20 November 2009 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    Please. When we talk presidential death threats, we are talking about nut-jobs, not people who disagree with Larry Summers about the best direction of funds for a Keynesian-style stimulus. The people who are displaying coded death threats and comparing Obama to Hitler are people who never believed he was elected legitimately, who think that every policy of Obama’s is ipso facto fascist/Marxist/Islamist/anti-American. Do you really think that the lunatic fringe will be mollified by an alteration in the administration’s fiscal policy?

  7. Scott
    Posted Friday, 20 November 2009 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, not great analysis. Where to start…Errors in data (Real figures are Unemployment at 10.2% in the US, 35 million on food stamps), no acknowledgement of the role of monetary policy in economic management (The Fed has shown no sign of increasing interest rates, no inflationary pressure), the disregard of the massive industrial affairs regulation enacted in the 1930’s which were anti-business (a contributing factor to the “double dip”), conspiracy theories..Economic analysis in crikey is going downhill fast (not that it was ever great)

  8. warwick fry
    Posted Friday, 20 November 2009 at 6:54 pm | Permalink

    Well … where to start…
    Good piece David. And it scares the living hell out of me. Time to question the premises of those in Australian policy formulation where and when we should be looking beyong a formal anglo angle.

    Have had a number of encounters with people who say ‘Obama is doing the best he can in a reactionary society’. They get upset when I disagree. Par for the course. His Latin American polices are just a soft spoken extension of second generation Busch regime. None of the ambassadors have been changed, none of the advisors. and an assumption that US Hegemony int he region should not be challenged has been promoted by the most recent State Department statement on the coup in Honduras.

    It’s a worry. Should our Australian asessors be looking forward to to the South East Asia, rather than copying US policy in Latin America … with the expectation that there is a beehive there …

  9. AR
    Posted Friday, 20 November 2009 at 8:33 pm | Permalink

    WIth each of the last several repug Prez’s who claimed to be isolationist I kept hoping that they were telling the truth but, of course the biz of amerika is ..belligerence in defence of biz.
    The question “why are amerikans?” is not satisfactorily answered by “Coz someone has to be..”.

  10. Harvey Tarvydas
    Posted Saturday, 21 November 2009 at 3:52 pm | Permalink

    Dr Harvey M Tarvydas

    David Hirst is a very brave man to be so forthright.
    That gruesomely ugly core to whom he is referring is more gruesome than he has dared to truly describe much less embellish, they with ‘acompaniants’ of power and popularity that we actually trust unthinkingly.
    I have gathered super evidence of their gruesomeness from extremely powerful but open innocent sources (therefore trustworthy for as powerful as they are they have not realised the potent meaning of their evidence against this gruesome ‘sub-culture’) which defines the sheer ugliness of their horror activities (which quite reasonably compare to the horrible Mr H and Mr S recently spoken about). I’ll say it takes a good scientist to be able to follow that evidence trail.

    Furthermore I’ll say that President Obama is fortunate to have that so under-rated Australian intellectual and very knowledgeable, competent doer blessed with such seriously important insight to advise him, the Australian Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd.

  11. Altakoi
    Posted Sunday, 22 November 2009 at 10:59 am | Permalink

    America seems to just be waking up to its loss of pre-eminence, which I think is unavoidable, but its not going to be pretty. The biblical slogans are not a problem because they mean people will turn on the bankers and the politicians, they are a problem because they are biblical quotes. A public which sees American exceptionalism in terms of the world-ending fight of good against evil will easily incorporate economic failure into its narrative of the devil’s work undermining the nation in the form of minorities, extreme greens, and illegals and a false-president. The collapse of the US economy may not actually be fought too hard by the nutter wing of the Republican party given that the only government program they actually like is the DOD. Everything else - education, professional jobs run by hoity urban elites, taxes, benefits to people who don’t go to Church - is not a priority for them. The middle ages were kind to the Church, it was the enlightenment which really sucked for them. So I think, ironically given the hype of the war on terror, the future of America looks a lot more like Iran. Which scares me because I know the US have nukes, and because Australia has never failed to follow where they lead.

  12. wyane
    Posted Tuesday, 24 November 2009 at 5:21 pm | Permalink

    Last night’s (repeat) of Top Gear (SBS) had a great example of why we (and ‘normal’ Americans) should fear the neo-cons and their army of hicks. Did you see it? The Top Gear team drove from Florida to New Orleans in three cars bought for < $1000 each. Scary encounters abound.