Crikey Clarifier: Scientology. WTF?
|
Tom Cruise is their most famous recruit, Wikipedia has banned them from editing its pages, and they’ve even inspired their own episode of Law and Order. So who exactly are the Scientologists and why have they suddenly come up in the news? Crikey waded into the morass… What is Scientology? According to the ABC: “It’s a system of beliefs, teachings and rituals originally established as a secular philosophy by L. Ron Hubbard. His 1950 book Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health, provided the core principles of what would later become Scientology.” What do Scientologists believe? According to Time magazine: “Hubbard argued that unhappiness sprang from mental aberrations (or “engrams”) caused by early traumas. Counseling sessions with the E-meter, he claimed, could knock out the engrams, cure blindness and even improve a person’s intelligence and appearance. Hubbard kept adding steps, each more costly, for his followers to climb. In the 1960s the guru decreed that humans are made of clusters of spirits (or “thetans”) who were banished to earth some 75 million years ago by a cruel galactic ruler named Xenu. Naturally, those thetans had to be audited”. How do they operate? Time magazine reports that the Church of Scientology runs consulting, education, healthcare, drug treatment and book publishing operations to generate income and build influence. In addition, Scientologists also subscribe to a number of controversial operational tactics: Fair game: According to L. Ron Hubbard: “Those who seek to damage the church may be deprived of property or injured by any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the Scientologist. May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed.” Aggressive litigation: According to L. Ron Hubbard: “beware of attorneys who tell you not to sue … the purpose of the suit is to harass and discourage rather than to win. Why are we suddenly talking about it? This week South Australia Independent Senator Nick Xenophon tabled a speech in Federal Parliament calling for Scientology to be stripped of its tax exempt status. According to Xenophon:
How wealthy is the Church of Scientology? As The Australian notes: “Its net worth is almost impossible to measure due partly to its tax exempt status in the US and elsewhere and the labyrinthine structure it operates under but Scientology is worth billions and turns over hundreds of millions every year”. In addition, a Time magazine investigation found that: “In a court filing, one of the cult’s many entities — the Church of Spiritual Technology — listed $503 million in income just for 1987. High-level defectors say the parent organization has squirreled away an estimated $400 million in bank accounts in Liechtenstein, Switzerland and Cyprus.” Why is the Church of Scientology exempt from tax? In Church of the New Faith v Commissioner of Payroll Tax (Vic) 1983, the High Court of Australia ruled that:
What makes it a religion, not a cult? That’s a good question. The Australian argues that:
But then again, why pick on Scientology? After all, haven’t Hillsong, the Anglican church, and the Catholic church all done terrible things with their tax breaks too? What have ex members said? Under protection of parliamentary privilege, Senator Xenophon has told the stories of several former Scientology members:
In addition, the St Petersburg Times recently published several interviews with high level defectors who allege that they were physically assaulted by Scientology leader David Miscavige. How have the Church of Scientology responded to this? The Church of Scientology have criticised Xenophon’s statements for being:
The Church of Scientology has also denied many of the claims made in the St Petersburg investigation. Are Scientologists litigious? Well, as The Australian very succinctly puts it:
In fact, the Church of Scientology has been spending plenty of time in the courts of late: SBS reported that: “A French court convicted the Church of Scientology and one of its leaders of defrauding vulnerable members on Tuesday, but stopped short of banning the group’s activities in France.” The Christian Science Monitor reports that the French case is the latest in a series of legal cases that Scientology has become entangled in, including “Lisa McPherson, an American member of the Church of Scientology, died while in the care of the church, which led to felony charges filed in 1998 and a civil suit filed against the church by Ms. McPherson’s parents in 1997. The felony charges of abuse and unlicensed practice of medicine were dropped in 2000 after a government medical examiner updated her initial finding that the death was “unexplained” to “accidental.” The church settled out of court with McPherson’s parents for an undisclosed sum in 2004. The medical examiner later resigned in the face of a public outcry. The church has also been on the offensive side of court action. In 1991, about 50 Scientologists from around the United States filed a series of lawsuits against the Cult Awareness Network, a leading critic of the church at the time. The Scientologists had all applied to join the network and after being rebuked, argued in their separate legal actions that this constituted unfair discrimination on the basis of their religious beliefs. The church described the network as a “hate group” and the organization eventually filed for bankruptcy under the weight of its legal fees and problems associated with its practice of kidnapping alleged “cult” members for a process it called “deprogramming.” Further reading: 1991 Time magazine investigation into the Church of Scientology. 2009 St Petersburg Times interviews with high level Scientology defectors. *View our Crikey Clarifier archive |
|
|
|









7 Comments
Needless to say, quite a number of “secret” Scientology documents have turned up on Wikileaks, including the “collected Operating Thetan documents” and their organisation charts. Very easy to find, should one choose to look…
Thanks for the heads-up Stil. But I wish I hadn’t read it. Just does not make any sense to me at all.
Are your floating needles under control?
@Evan Beaver: Oh, in the names of all the gods, man, do not attempt to understand that stuff! Only someone with the intellectual fortitude of Tom Cruise can handle The Truth!
Well, or maybe John Travolta too.
And Kate Ceberano.
And Isaac Hayes and Beck and various others.
No article about scientology is complete without reference to the ‘Fishman papers’ - go to http://www.xs4all.nl/~waa/scientology/affidavit.html Scientologists have tried at least twice to get this material removed, but failed.
A reference to the relevant episode of South Park is also useful. It’s got what is probably the best and most succinct summary of what scientologists believe.
Scientology is standard ‘mystery religion’ stuff, ie you come up with something that is conceptually ambiguous, then tell potential recruits that all will become clear (‘scuse scientologist pun) and they will be saved from something nasty if they join, pay for courses, submit to sex with cult leaders etc. Ambiguity like Christianity’s treatment of Jesus- a man, or a god, both simultaneously, and also separate simultaneously??? This ambiguous duality idea was borrowed from Greek/Roman religion by early christians. Being asked to meditate on the sound of one hand clapping is probably in the same category.
Why pick on Scientology? Alternative belief structures incorporating such as illogical aspect such as transmutation of wine into blood, virgin birth, miracles, the parting of the Red Sea etc are similarly based mindless credulity on the part of the followers.
It is unfortunate that social evolution involving slavish adherence to leaders which makes groups strong and powerful intertribal conflict has as its very basis a requirement for credulous belief in the leader without the exercise judgement. Otherwise millions of young men would not have marched to their deaths in World War I.
Scientology is just another manifestation of a long line the abuse of followers by charismatic leaders generally masquerading under the title of religion. The essential structure of all of these processes is “deliverance” only by slavishly following the proclamations of leaders. These leaders of course have to be housed and fed in the manner to which they have become accustomed thereby requiring their followers to make generous donations towards their upkeep and continuing ministrations.
Compared to the impact of Marxism or the Roman Catholic Church, the abuse of power by Scientologists is relatively insignificant and hardly worthy of comment. If it was not for the puerile fascination with the lifestyle of so-called “film stars” Scientology would hardly rate a mention.
As we can document the emergence of Scientology is a recent phenomenon in the last 50 years or so, it is a pity that we cannot document the origins of Judaism or the Catholic Church in the same basis. If so I’m sure we would have a similar basis for derision.
Greg- in case you didn’t hear about it, we’re picking on Scientology because it’s the subject of examination due to Sen. Xenophon’s recent statement. If he had got stuck into fervent christian evangelicalism or militant islam, we might be discussing those instead. Sure, Scientology hasn’t yet been responsible for major disastrous events like the Crusades, but that’s a fairly weak reason to avoid examining it- better to do it now, rather than wait until it’s laid waste to a continent or two, eh?
As for your last para, it’s time for some reading, m’lad. Thanks to modern archaeology, we know quite a bit about the origins of Judaism, and the development of early Christianity. For starters on Judaism, try ‘the Bible Unearthed’ by Finkelstein & Silberman; for early Christianity, try ‘Lost Christianities’ by Bart Ehrman.
Extra
I thought I made my point fairly clear. I was not defending Scientology. On the contrary I don’t see it as being any different from other absurd belief structures.
I am quite aware that there is a lot of documentation concerning the the rise of religion. Once established, the original reasons become irrelevant once the initial message is hijacked by the priesthood.
In relation to Scientology is clearly documented path from L Ron Hubbard’s delusional ravings to the current exploitative cult. I am not aware of any independent contemporary observation concerning Jesus, Abraham, Moses etc , and we appear to be entirely dependent on the communications already packaged by the priesthoods, as a tool for social management and exploitation.
If we had the same independent information as we have for Scientology, we would have a better understanding concerning the evolution of these alternative belief structures.