Fake Stephen Fielding: PMS and a One World Government

As you all know I’ve been following the climate change and emissions trading scheme debate very closely. Earlier this year I travelled to the USA to consult widely with the Heartland Institute and they gave me a nifty graph to show to all my friends at Parliament. Nick Xzennophone asked if I made it myself in crayon but he shut his mouth quick smart after I showed him the quality of the laminate and the superb laser printing.

I like to make sure that I look at both sides of the story, and the ETS debate is no different. I’ve looked at the government’s side (anthropomorphic climate change is definitely real and we need an EMS right now) and the opposition’s side (anthrophomorphic climate change is possibly real and we might need an LMS some time in the short or medium term), but Family First’s side of the story is quite different again: anhtro antro antrhop man-made climate change is a myth and the PMS is completely unnecessary and will destroy man’s way of life.

But you wouldn’t believe the trouble I’ve had in getting my view heard! Penny Wong and Ian Macfarlane meet regularly to thrash out a version of the government Bill that the coalition might support, but the way they’ve dismissed Family First’s role in these crucial negotiations is a disgrace to Australian democracy. Imagine a democratically elected Senator being manhandled and ejected from meetings inside Parliament House! It’s not like they didn’t know I was coming; each time I’ve told Xzennophone to tell Barnaby to tell Macfarlane, and Xzennophone to tell Conroy to tell Wong.

Some nights I’ve been in tears at home, burning up with the indignity of the way the other MPs treat me. I tried telling David Hawker about the teasing and bullying but he didn’t seem to care. Even my son, when he got home from school the other day and found me on the lounge with Blanky, told me to “harden the fuck up”. I told him that’s not very Christian language but he just mumbled something about wishing he was adopted.

So when I heard some people this week start talking about a One World Government that might be formed in Copenhagen soon, I got very excited. Maybe I could run for election to a government that is kinder and more accepting. A government that is inclusive and considerate. A government that looks at all of my sides of the story. I mentioned to Susan that this new government will add significantly to the Pope’s workload given that he’s the head of the world, but Susan told me he’s only the head of the Catholic Church. And you could’ve blown me right there and then when Susan dropped the bombshell that the Pentecostal Church is not part of the Catholic Church so the Pope isn’t even the head of me! A lifetime of delusion, it seems.

Anyway, I’ve started doing some research into how one would go about running a campaign for the One World Government, and I’m trying to book a flight to the Hungarian capital to be at the centre of the action at its inception. Given that Australia is part of the world, and the One World Government will be the world’s boss, I will be able to have much more influence over Australia’s PMT policy from the OWG Parliament than from the chamber of Australia’s Senate.

Until next time.

22 Comments

  1. peterhatch
    Posted Wednesday, 11 November 2009 at 1:46 pm | Permalink

    does one have to berated at every turn to question the ETS or CPRS or whatever label it is?
    If the government were seriouse about this issue
    Wouldn’t they have a straight c02 tax
    Wouldn’t they lay off of Turnbull whilst he tries to get his party behind negotiations.
    Wouldn’t they supply uranium to India.
    The ETS would seem to just give the finance industry a new toy to trade.
    The auditors seem to be a dodgy lot….

  2. peterhatch
    Posted Wednesday, 11 November 2009 at 2:51 pm | Permalink

    according to a recent lowry poll climate change has fallen to a 7th order of priority for Australians. Couldn’t Rudd now for once take a tough decision and say carbon tax is a better and more honest answer than the proposed ETS….

  3. Chris
    Posted Wednesday, 11 November 2009 at 2:59 pm | Permalink

    More FSF!!!

  4. Sexual Lobster
    Posted Wednesday, 11 November 2009 at 3:23 pm | Permalink

    peter hatch: if its the same poll I remember hearing so much about, it was a poll of foreign policy concerns. So looking at climate change through the filter of Australian’s foreign policy concerns does not mean it is 7th in our order of priorities, its 7th in our order of foreign policy priorities, which I think is a major difference.
    It annoyed me greatly that most media coverage of the poll that I encountered fudged what it was about.

  5. peterhatch
    Posted Wednesday, 11 November 2009 at 3:30 pm | Permalink

    sexual lobster you are correct but if you look at the higher ranking priorities such as saving jobs,
    and controlling illegal immigrants, and strenghtening the economy i wonder how many made this fine distinction…

  6. Posted Wednesday, 11 November 2009 at 3:47 pm | Permalink

    I love irony and this is terrific! Very well done.

  7. peterhatch
    Posted Wednesday, 11 November 2009 at 3:49 pm | Permalink

    I also note hat the price of carbon in chicago is 10c a ton with Australian permits starting at $20
    a ton why won’t companies buy the right to “pollute” off shore.
    this will also make it impossible for the government to compensate anyone affected by it’s scheme..
    that is why I say this scheme is not honest so why not a simple tax on c02

  8. Heathdon McGregor
    Posted Wednesday, 11 November 2009 at 4:39 pm | Permalink

    I tried to get my questions answered but all I got were people calling me stupid in order to not answer my questions.

  9. Heathdon McGregor
    Posted Wednesday, 11 November 2009 at 4:44 pm | Permalink

    Dear Peterhatch

    The ETS would seem to just give the finance industry a new toy to trade.

    Hear hear

    Did anybody else feel ill when Mr Marr started referring to EcoNazis rather than answer a question about this in his debate with Mr Akerman on insiders on Sunday morning?

    It may be beneath you to continually answer the sceptics questions with patience but isn’t the planet worth it?

  10. Heathdon McGregor
    Posted Wednesday, 11 November 2009 at 4:53 pm | Permalink

    If the government was serious about the planet and not the economy then why wasn’t an environmentalist/ecologist hired to write the report and not Mr Garnaut, an economist? It could have been co-authored. Perhaps because the government are concerned with the economy above all else. They can blame Mr Fielding from My Family First (with thanks to Leaping Larry L) call him stupid and make their followers feel happy, smarter and superior but it wont fix the planet.

  11. peterhatch
    Posted Wednesday, 11 November 2009 at 6:27 pm | Permalink

    even Marr on insiders queried about who was going to Audit…
    someone has to go around to every site and measure their c02 output then return and measure again if they have reduced they get credits to trade…
    This is so open to corruption, that in Europe they the UN has had to sack one of the two large auditing firms for accepting bribes….

  12. AR
    Posted Wednesday, 11 November 2009 at 7:57 pm | Permalink

    I’m noit convinced this is a fake Fielding - sounds very much like our (un)esteemed Senator.

  13. peterhatch
    Posted Wednesday, 11 November 2009 at 8:20 pm | Permalink

    are their any Fairfax/ABC pinko luddites out their who can speak in favour of krudds ETS

  14. peterhatch
    Posted Wednesday, 11 November 2009 at 9:32 pm | Permalink

    my view is as a climate realist that is the earth warming maybe but not at the moment are the seas rising no more than in the years since he last ice age.. so lets deal with the consequences…
    but what i would like to see from Australian politicians is some guts..
    if you believe that global warming is man made tell us the truth about what you propose..
    do what England is doing and stop producing electricity with coal and convert to gas
    start building nuclear…
    and in addition stop exporting coal..
    and introduce a c02 tax with no one compensated..
    anything else is a fudge…and is denying us a choice….

  15. Posted Wednesday, 11 November 2009 at 10:08 pm | Permalink

    Why is it that very few people seem to be aware of the greatest problem facing humanity. And that is over-population. The minute people take this reality into account with Climate Change will be the moment something will be done which will be of lasting good. At the moment whatever steps are taken on ETS are merely marching on the spot.

    As I have noted elsewhere, there seems to be a direct link between CC denialists and an abiding belief in god. And the chances of these people agreeing to a two-child family are exceedingly slim.

  16. peterhatch
    Posted Wednesday, 11 November 2009 at 10:25 pm | Permalink

    this is old news we already know the future poulation of the world it will rise to 9billion then rapidly decline…

  17. peterhatch
    Posted Wednesday, 11 November 2009 at 10:46 pm | Permalink

    i actualy don’t agree with you climate panics are the new religion…
    I don’t beleive in any religion..including jesus or gore…

  18. peterhatch
    Posted Wednesday, 11 November 2009 at 11:22 pm | Permalink

    silence is golden

    as usual the left seem bereft of ideas.. never mind krudd the micro manager will tell you what to think

  19. kebab shop pizza
    Posted Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 1:28 pm | Permalink

    erm, most fundies/happyclappers don’t even regard Catholics as christians, let alone part of the same church. I think ‘Fake Stephen Fielding’ may be bearing false witness !

  20. Posted Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 6:52 pm | Permalink

    Peter Hatch: IMHO this so called by you, old news, IS news to the greater majority of people. Which is why I linked CC denial to a devout belief in god. As the divine (?) Steve Fielding (the original version) said after his world trip to find the truth about CC. ‘Climate Change doesn’t exist because god didn’t invent it’. Further, I have mentioned in other comments that Tony Abbott, the Jesuit-trained, failed priest, also is a vehement denialist, and doubtless for the same reason. God didn’t invent it.

    As long as people believe there is a god, so long will they be easily led by the above-mentioned clowns. Reason apparently doesn’t grow in such foetid soil. Whereas the population explosion is actually seen as godly by the religious. And if you can see the reason for that, then you are a better man than I am Gunga Din.

  21. Posted Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 6:54 pm | Permalink

    PS: Peter Hatch, where are all the manifold, and beneficial ideas of the Coalition?

  22. peterhatch
    Posted Thursday, 12 November 2009 at 10:50 pm | Permalink

    if you are talking about the right we have many ides which are based on taking decisions at the lowest level and maximum freedom for the individual.

Register now to join the conversation instantly, or log in to post a comment now.