<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News Corp revenue slumps 4.1%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/05/news-corp-revenue-slumps-4-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/05/news-corp-revenue-slumps-4-1/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:48:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: meski</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/05/news-corp-revenue-slumps-4-1/#comment-44216</link>
		<dc:creator>meski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/05/news-corp-revenue-slumps-4-1/#comment-44216</guid>
		<description>@MPM:  If you look at the fine print:

Mediaite’s “Power Grid” objectively ranks media professionals across a dozen categories based on their real-time relevance. Power Grid rankings rely on an array of metrics, including anything and everything from circulation to Twitter followers to Google buzz depending on the category.

Twitter followers?  Well, that *is* authoritative. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@MPM:  If you look at the fine print:</p>
<p>Mediaite’s “Power Grid” objectively ranks media professionals across a dozen categories based on their real-time relevance. Power Grid rankings rely on an array of metrics, including anything and everything from circulation to Twitter followers to Google buzz depending on the category.</p>
<p>Twitter followers?  Well, that *is* authoritative. <img src='http://www.crikey.com.au/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Most Peculiar Mama</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/05/news-corp-revenue-slumps-4-1/#comment-44157</link>
		<dc:creator>Most Peculiar Mama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/05/news-corp-revenue-slumps-4-1/#comment-44157</guid>
		<description>&quot;...Fox News is obviously making a lot of money out of bagging President Obama and his administration...&quot;

Oh boo-hoo.

What a fatuous statement.

Barry enjoys the overwhelming support of all the other major Cable and FTA channels as well as the editorial support of many of the country&#039;s biggest newspapers.

Yet ONE news outlet is so pervasive and persuasive that it reduces Obama to a quivering gelatinous mess.

But then again...

CNN the &quot;most trusted name in news&quot; comes in a shocking 4th on election night

PRIMETIME (8-11 PM/ET)

FOXNEWS: 4,043,000 viewers (1,130,000 in A25-54) 

MSNBC: 974,000 viewers(308,000 in A25-54) 

HEADLINE NEWS: 842,000 viewers(341,000 in A25-54) 

CNN: 826,000 viewers (227,000 in A25-54)

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/wake-up-call-cnns-election-coverage-finishes-fourth/

Maybe there is something into this speaking truth to power.

The audience has obviously decided who they choose to believe. 

Your thoughts on this excellent result for News Limted Glenn?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="dquo">&#8220;</span>&#8230;Fox News is obviously making a lot of money out of bagging President Obama and his administration&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh boo-hoo.</p>
<p>What a fatuous statement.</p>
<p>Barry enjoys the overwhelming support of all the other major Cable and FTA channels as well as the editorial support of many of the country&#8217;s biggest newspapers.</p>
<p>Yet ONE news outlet is so pervasive and persuasive that it reduces Obama to a quivering gelatinous mess.</p>
<p>But then again&#8230;</p>
<p>CNN the &#8220;most trusted name in news&#8221; comes in a shocking 4th on election night</p>
<p>PRIMETIME (8-11 PM/ET)</p>
<p>FOXNEWS: 4,043,000 viewers (1,130,000 in A25-54) </p>
<p>MSNBC: 974,000 viewers(308,000 in A25-54) </p>
<p>HEADLINE NEWS: 842,000 viewers(341,000 in A25-54) </p>
<p>CNN: 826,000 viewers (227,000 in A25-54)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/wake-up-call-cnns-election-coverage-finishes-fourth/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mediaite.com/tv/wake-up-call-cnns-election-coverage-finishes-fourth/</a></p>
<p>Maybe there is something into this speaking truth to power.</p>
<p>The audience has obviously decided who they choose to believe. </p>
<p>Your thoughts on this excellent result for News Limted Glenn?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 469/479 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 14:51:18 -->
