<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Europe gets a new constitution &#8212; sort of</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/05/europe-gets-a-new-constitution-sort-of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/05/europe-gets-a-new-constitution-sort-of/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:48:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Richardson</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/05/europe-gets-a-new-constitution-sort-of/#comment-44669</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/05/europe-gets-a-new-constitution-sort-of/#comment-44669</guid>
		<description>Thanks everyone for the feedback. Yes, I was aware of the other meaning of &quot;teabagging&quot;, but the crazies in the US applied it to themselves - evidently without first looking it up on urbandictionary.

Italy is interesting: the right is certainly racist, or at least pandering to racism. But I think the immigration issue is a bit of a special case in Europe - it plays into &quot;national identity&quot; issues in a differen way from anything in the US or Australia. Berlusconi&#039;s government actually isn&#039;t very right wing in other ways - he refused to send troops to Iraq, for example, until the invasion was safely over.

The distinction between left &amp; right supposedly goes back to the French national assembly of the revolutionary period, where the more radical members sat on the left of the chamber. It&#039;s one of those things that&#039;s hopelessly muddled in theory but nonetheless still works in practice. I criticise it myself, but can&#039;t help using it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks everyone for the feedback. Yes, I was aware of the other meaning of &#8220;teabagging&#8221;, but the crazies in the US applied it to themselves - evidently without first looking it up on urbandictionary.</p>
<p>Italy is interesting: the right is certainly racist, or at least pandering to racism. But I think the immigration issue is a bit of a special case in Europe - it plays into &#8220;national identity&#8221; issues in a differen way from anything in the US or Australia. Berlusconi&#8217;s government actually isn&#8217;t very right wing in other ways - he refused to send troops to Iraq, for example, until the invasion was safely over.</p>
<p>The distinction between left &amp; right supposedly goes back to the French national assembly of the revolutionary period, where the more radical members sat on the left of the chamber. It&#8217;s one of those things that&#8217;s hopelessly muddled in theory but nonetheless still works in practice. I criticise it myself, but can&#8217;t help using it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomboy</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/05/europe-gets-a-new-constitution-sort-of/#comment-44204</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/05/europe-gets-a-new-constitution-sort-of/#comment-44204</guid>
		<description>Can anyone please enlighten how the designations &quot;left&quot; and &quot;right&quot; came about?  I mean, how come it isn&#039;t the other way around?  And furthermore, where to anarchists sit?  Maybe the distinctions &quot;left&quot; &quot;right&quot; and &quot;centre&quot; are no longer appropriate - they are two-dimensinal.  How can one describe political philosophies that are based on deconstructed versions of &quot;left&quot;, &quot;right&quot;, and &quot;centre&quot;?  Maybe it&#039;s time (no pun intended) to do away with two-dimensional views, and replace them with multidimensional perspectives...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone please enlighten how the designations &#8220;left&#8221; and &#8220;right&#8221; came about?  I mean, how come it isn&#8217;t the other way around?  And furthermore, where to anarchists sit?  Maybe the distinctions &#8220;left&#8221; &#8220;right&#8221; and &#8220;centre&#8221; are no longer appropriate - they are two-dimensinal.  How can one describe political philosophies that are based on deconstructed versions of &#8220;left&#8221;, &#8220;right&#8221;, and &#8220;centre&#8221;?  Maybe it&#8217;s time (no pun intended) to do away with two-dimensional views, and replace them with multidimensional perspectives&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Cleverick</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/05/europe-gets-a-new-constitution-sort-of/#comment-44181</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Cleverick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/05/europe-gets-a-new-constitution-sort-of/#comment-44181</guid>
		<description>You might want to look up the meaning of &quot;teabagging&quot;. Unless you meant that, of course. It&#039;s entirely precise, but whether it&#039;s appropriate...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to look up the meaning of &#8220;teabagging&#8221;. Unless you meant that, of course. It&#8217;s entirely precise, but whether it&#8217;s appropriate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bogdanovist</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/05/europe-gets-a-new-constitution-sort-of/#comment-44178</link>
		<dc:creator>Bogdanovist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/05/europe-gets-a-new-constitution-sort-of/#comment-44178</guid>
		<description>This certainly does not reflect the situation in Italy. The mainstream ruling political parties of Berlusconi and his allies the Lega Nord (Northern League) would make Pauline Hanson blush! I&#039;m living in northern Italy at the moment and the campaign posters put during the recent EU parliament elections were horrendous. Here are some examples of Lega Nord posters (they get around 20-30% of the vote in northern electorates and are as I say a coalition partner of Berlusconi&#039;s party):

&quot;They had rapid immigration and now they live in a reservation&quot;. Complete with cartoon picture of a native American Chieftain.

&quot;For the defense of radical christianity and for saying no to the Turkish in Europe&quot;

&quot;Enough Burqas&quot;. This one was accompanied by photo of the candidate literally tearing a burqa off a woman he was holding down. That one was really scary, especially the cheesey shit eating grin he was wearing while doing it.

There are also plenty of eastern European mainstream political parties that hold some pretty scary views, so it&#039;s not all rosey and enlightened in Europe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This certainly does not reflect the situation in Italy. The mainstream ruling political parties of Berlusconi and his allies the Lega Nord (Northern League) would make Pauline Hanson blush! I&#8217;m living in northern Italy at the moment and the campaign posters put during the recent EU parliament elections were horrendous. Here are some examples of Lega Nord posters (they get around 20-30% of the vote in northern electorates and are as I say a coalition partner of Berlusconi&#8217;s party):</p>
<p><span class="dquo">&#8220;</span>They had rapid immigration and now they live in a reservation&#8221;. Complete with cartoon picture of a native American Chieftain.</p>
<p><span class="dquo">&#8220;</span>For the defense of radical christianity and for saying no to the Turkish in Europe&#8221;</p>
<p><span class="dquo">&#8220;</span>Enough Burqas&#8221;. This one was accompanied by photo of the candidate literally tearing a burqa off a woman he was holding down. That one was really scary, especially the cheesey shit eating grin he was wearing while doing it.</p>
<p>There are also plenty of eastern European mainstream political parties that hold some pretty scary views, so it&#8217;s not all rosey and enlightened in Europe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Reiher</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/05/europe-gets-a-new-constitution-sort-of/#comment-44140</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Reiher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 03:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/05/europe-gets-a-new-constitution-sort-of/#comment-44140</guid>
		<description>Interesting observations. I lament the so called &quot;middle&quot; or &quot;centre&quot; in Australia. 

Go back a couple of decades (just before Hawke became PM - around that time) and you had from left to right:

Labor / Democrat / Liberal / National 

and with the appearance and growth of the Greens:

Green / Labor / Democrat / Liberal / National 

The centre in those days was kind of Democrat - you know: economically like the Libs but socially progressive and reasonable on the whole..... 

But then... under Hawke and especially Keating, Labor shifted:

Green /                 / Democrat / Labor / Liberal / National

And then with the demise of the Democrats:

Green /                                         / Labor/ Liberal/ National

And now the so-called centre (shifting centre) is somewhere in the ?Liberal? camp!  

But it is not really &quot;centre&quot; at all. It is right. We just don&#039;t have much to fill the gap that has been left behind by movement of Labor and loss of Democrats. 

And in the end, for someone with my bias and my lens that I see things through... who wants the middle anyway? Middle is a relative term. More power to the Greens I say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting observations. I lament the so called &#8220;middle&#8221; or &#8220;centre&#8221; in Australia. </p>
<p>Go back a couple of decades (just before Hawke became PM - around that time) and you had from left to right:</p>
<p>Labor / Democrat / Liberal / National </p>
<p>and with the appearance and growth of the Greens:</p>
<p>Green / Labor / Democrat / Liberal / National </p>
<p>The centre in those days was kind of Democrat - you know: economically like the Libs but socially progressive and reasonable on the whole&#8230;.. </p>
<p>But then&#8230; under Hawke and especially Keating, Labor shifted:</p>
<p>Green /                 / Democrat / Labor / Liberal / National</p>
<p>And then with the demise of the Democrats:</p>
<p>Green /                                         / Labor/ Liberal/ National</p>
<p>And now the so-called centre (shifting centre) is somewhere in the ?Liberal? camp!  </p>
<p>But it is not really &#8220;centre&#8221; at all. It is right. We just don&#8217;t have much to fill the gap that has been left behind by movement of Labor and loss of Democrats. </p>
<p>And in the end, for someone with my bias and my lens that I see things through&#8230; who wants the middle anyway? Middle is a relative term. More power to the Greens I say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 561/571 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 15:01:56 -->
