<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Voters get older while participants get younger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/26/richard-farmers-chunky-bits-30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/26/richard-farmers-chunky-bits-30/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:14:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bennetts</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/26/richard-farmers-chunky-bits-30/#comment-42924</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bennetts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/26/richard-farmers-chunky-bits-30/#comment-42924</guid>
		<description>Richard, you have given it away.

67!

here am I, only young and 60, so of course I forgive you your not bonding with Natasha Stott WhatsHerName.

Besides which, she married a conservative.

Please remind me... what was inflating?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, you have given it away.</p>
<p>67!</p>
<p>here am I, only young and 60, so of course I forgive you your not bonding with Natasha Stott WhatsHerName.</p>
<p>Besides which, she married a conservative.</p>
<p>Please remind me&#8230; what was inflating?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wombat</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/26/richard-farmers-chunky-bits-30/#comment-42923</link>
		<dc:creator>Wombat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/26/richard-farmers-chunky-bits-30/#comment-42923</guid>
		<description>Richard, I normally agree with a lot you have to say.  But the very concept of needing MORE people aged 50+ running this country makes me absolutely f**king furious.  Perhaps it is you that needs to grow up a bit?  &quot;Experience of life&quot; indeed.  Just goes to show that every ageing lefty ends up a conservative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, I normally agree with a lot you have to say.  But the very concept of needing MORE people aged 50+ running this country makes me absolutely f**king furious.  Perhaps it is you that needs to grow up a bit?  &#8220;Experience of life&#8221; indeed.  Just goes to show that every ageing lefty ends up a conservative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Farmer</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/26/richard-farmers-chunky-bits-30/#comment-42920</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Farmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/26/richard-farmers-chunky-bits-30/#comment-42920</guid>
		<description>Kirk - I fear I am talking my own age - 67 on All Saints Day! 
More seriously, though, I worry about people with no experience of life at all having important roles in running the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kirk - I fear I am talking my own age - 67 on All Saints Day!<br />
More seriously, though, I worry about people with no experience of life at all having important roles in running the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bennetts</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/26/richard-farmers-chunky-bits-30/#comment-42878</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bennetts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/26/richard-farmers-chunky-bits-30/#comment-42878</guid>
		<description>Remember the Doc Martin&#039;s?

The age of the wearer is no indication of the fit of the shoe.

Natasha was smart from the start and never lost it.  Pity she gave up, really.  What this country needs is smart, quick-witted, honourable and multi-skilled politicians of whatever age.

Note that Wilson Tucky is not what I have in mind.  Nor yet another lawyer.  Or party hack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember the Doc Martin&#8217;s?</p>
<p>The age of the wearer is no indication of the fit of the shoe.</p>
<p>Natasha was smart from the start and never lost it.  Pity she gave up, really.  What this country needs is smart, quick-witted, honourable and multi-skilled politicians of whatever age.</p>
<p>Note that Wilson Tucky is not what I have in mind.  Nor yet another lawyer.  Or party hack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk Broadhurst</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/26/richard-farmers-chunky-bits-30/#comment-42837</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk Broadhurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/26/richard-farmers-chunky-bits-30/#comment-42837</guid>
		<description>Beg to disagree, Richard.

Although Costello and Nelson are not so old that they are due to retire - like too many other sitting MPs - they are, at over 50 years of age, too old to be entering politics.  Enter at 52 or 53, take a few years to get your footing, and all of a sudden they are 60 years old.

I would much rather have my public officers at 40 years of age than 60 years of age.  There is some &#039;experience&#039; that is gained with age, but the older individual lacks the energy, vigour, and relevance (i.e. being &#039;in touch&#039;) of the younger.

Experience is important, which is why the public prefer those at 40 years over those at 20 years.  But quite simply I prefer not to empower a 60+ year old with making important decisions on my behalf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beg to disagree, Richard.</p>
<p>Although Costello and Nelson are not so old that they are due to retire - like too many other sitting MPs - they are, at over 50 years of age, too old to be entering politics.  Enter at 52 or 53, take a few years to get your footing, and all of a sudden they are 60 years old.</p>
<p>I would much rather have my public officers at 40 years of age than 60 years of age.  There is some &#8216;experience&#8217; that is gained with age, but the older individual lacks the energy, vigour, and relevance (i.e. being &#8216;in touch&#8217;) of the younger.</p>
<p>Experience is important, which is why the public prefer those at 40 years over those at 20 years.  But quite simply I prefer not to empower a 60+ year old with making important decisions on my behalf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 562/572 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 13:26:25 -->
