<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The $20b CPRS amendments with no budget impact</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/21/the-20b-cprs-amendments-with-no-budget-impact/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/21/the-20b-cprs-amendments-with-no-budget-impact/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:58:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom McLoughlin</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/21/the-20b-cprs-amendments-with-no-budget-impact/#comment-42256</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom McLoughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/21/the-20b-cprs-amendments-with-no-budget-impact/#comment-42256</guid>
		<description>I think we can assume that the Govt from the heights of their polling will stone wall the Coalition on level of specificity in the CPRS  via undefined regulations. Once passed they can judge the vagaries of &#039;events dear boy, events&#039; and turn up or down the carbon price as they prefer, as well as renewable energy investment. A bit like altering the mixture in a carburetor flow of oxygen and fuel.

The ALP can do the legislation by negotiation or DD either way it&#039;s going to be a brute political transaction given those polls, and the sustainability of same. 

How sustainable are the high polls? Well if the economy continues an upswing then the Opposition can shout as loud as they like it&#039;s a tax, farmers will be rooned (aka cows won&#039;t fart anymore), the lights will go out, the illegals whirlwind will swamp us, but the audience won&#039;t really be listening, unless there is pain to make it credible.

And given the commodity driven cushion for years to roll, there isn&#039;t that kind of pain around. This in turn will put more pressure on Turnbull to try another high risk tactic, and he doesn&#039;t have any strikes left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we can assume that the Govt from the heights of their polling will stone wall the Coalition on level of specificity in the CPRS  via undefined regulations. Once passed they can judge the vagaries of &#8216;events dear boy, events&#8217; and turn up or down the carbon price as they prefer, as well as renewable energy investment. A bit like altering the mixture in a carburetor flow of oxygen and fuel.</p>
<p>The ALP can do the legislation by negotiation or DD either way it&#8217;s going to be a brute political transaction given those polls, and the sustainability of same. </p>
<p>How sustainable are the high polls? Well if the economy continues an upswing then the Opposition can shout as loud as they like it&#8217;s a tax, farmers will be rooned (aka cows won&#8217;t fart anymore), the lights will go out, the illegals whirlwind will swamp us, but the audience won&#8217;t really be listening, unless there is pain to make it credible.</p>
<p>And given the commodity driven cushion for years to roll, there isn&#8217;t that kind of pain around. This in turn will put more pressure on Turnbull to try another high risk tactic, and he doesn&#8217;t have any strikes left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 434/444 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 12:34:24 -->
