Wall St was down 94 overnight, its biggest fall in a month, while the local market is down 66.
Why people smugglers are smug
|
Today Crikey spoke with Joseph Jagadeeswaran, a Sri Lankan currently in Indonesia, who is waiting for the opportunity to board a vessel heading for Australia. Crikey: Joseph, why do you want to come to Australia? Jagadeeswaran: Well, I had a very comfortable middle-class life in Sri Lanka, but whenever our cricket team plays in Australia, the television shows how good life is in Australia. I decided I wanted to live there instead. Crikey: What about the war in your homeland? Jagadeeswaran: Oh, yes, that too. Crikey: And why now? Jagadeeswaran: Well, when I first heard that John Howard had lost office, I was very excited. But I was cautious. I was careful to examine how my claims for asylum would be assessed. Also, I had enough money to fly to Australia on a tourist visa, but I thought it would look better if I arrived on a tiny, overcrowded and highly dangerous boat that might carry me to the bottom of the Indian Ocean at any moment. So I had to wait for a people smuggler to get me on a boat. Crikey: So did the Rudd government’s changes to the process for assessing asylum claims influence your decision? Jagadeeswaran: Absolutely. If you read the Migration Amendment (Immigration Detention Reform) Bill 2009, it makes clear that getting into Australia has never been easier. Crikey: Is that what people smugglers are saying? Jagadeeswaran: Yes, although a number of us are engaged in a dispute over a meaning in the Acts Interpretation Act about what a non-compellable power is. Crikey: But that Bill hasn’t actually become law yet. Everyone who comes to Australia at the moment will be processed under the old Howard-era arrangements. Jagadeeswaran: Don’t spoil my story of being a lazy economic refugee out to exploit Labor’s bleeding heart immigration laxity, mate. |
|
|
|













2 Comments
Awesome.
Spot on! I especially love the bit about the “non-compellable power”.