Boycotting Skype, Littlely reads the riot act
|
So where have all the Canwest shares in the Ten Network ended up? So far substantial shareholding notices have come from a handful of big investors, leaving the new owners of around half the Canwest holding to reveal themselves. Macquarie Capital took all the 50.57% of Ten from Canwest (or 523.249 million shares) and placed them in the market at $1.30 a share. Settlement was October 1 (Wednesday). Macquarie says it’s no longer a substantial holder, having advised the market of the fact at 4.01pm on September 29. (Its initial substantial holding notice was processed late and was filed at 5.42 pm on the same day). So far three new substantial holders have emerged holding more than 5% of Ten. They are Paradice (5.01%), UBS Nominees (5.4%) and Ausbil Dexia,(7.28%) while the Common Bank has lifted its stake to around 13.97% from 6.44%. According to a filing this week, the CBA (through Colonial First State) seems to have lifted its stake by around 7.5% Those disclosures account for around 25-26% of Ten’s shares, leaving just under 25% unaccounted for so far. Meanwhile the Ten Network has announced that two Canwest representatives have left the board in the shape of Leonard Asper and Tom Strike. Peter Viner, another senior Canwest executives remains on the board because of his long association with the Network, having been CEO at one stage. Ten’s chairman, Nick Falloon said in the statement: “We are delighted that Peter Viner, a former CEO of The Ten Group and currently President of Canwest Broadcasting, will remain as a Director of Ten Holdings. Peter’s valuable combination of local and international experience in the television sector ensures he is well placed to continue to make a significant contribution to the Board.” Mr Viner also has valuable contacts in the US TV business. — Glenn Dyer Australian media should brace for a stagnant 2010: Australian advertising spend will finish further behind than previously predicted in 2009, and won’t grow in 2010 either, media agency Carat has warned. After growth of 3.7% last year, Carat predicts that by the end of 2009, Australian ad spend will have fallen by 6.5% — a much more pessimistic figure than its previous prediction of a fall of 1.9%. — Mumbrella Littlely reads the riot act:
Answer the question — yes or no? Who is writing the daily question polls for ninemsn? Today’s poll question is: Are you more worried about nuclear war or climate change? Yes or no being the only response open. Classic! — Crikey reader John Cox Local government media black ban: Many people will find this hard to believe, but in parts of Australia local government politicians are being prevented, under threat of legal action, from talking to the media. I know. It’s ridiculous. What kind of a democracy is it when a polly can’t talk to the electorate? Yet it is happening. I have become aware of this phenomenon over the last year or so, through the work I do with suburban and rural newspaper reporters. — Margaret Simons, The Content Makers You are being shagged by a rare parrot: Stephen Fry and zoologist Mark Carwardine head to the ends of the earth in search of animals on the edge of extinction. In New Zealand the travellers make their way through one of the most dramatic landscapes in the world. They are on a journey to find the last remaining kakapo, a fat, flightless parrot. The creature then offers a hint as to why it’s facing extinction… Watch here. — BBC’s Last Chance to See An open letter to Aaron Sorkin:
— Wired Ten reasons why you should boycott Skype: If you want to understand what Skype actually is, it might help to picture an almighty telephone and mail company. This company cannot only spy on your private conversations and has total control over them, but it also forces you to use it. It owns the telephone lines and all mail transportation and does not let other companies use them. — Freedom Blog |
|
|
|








3 Comments
The Skype article is real tinfoil hat stuff.
Marg, when I helped close the Waterloo Incinerator as a Waverley Councillor 1997 the nice ALP Left majority faction held a special meeting indicating I should show cause why speaking out against the facility was not grounds for report to the Dept of Local Govt (run by their own patronlocal MP Ernie Page MP), and be removed from my position.
However a prior visit to the EDO office and referral to their copy of the ground breaking Local Govt Act (NSW) (pre Austlii and web data bases) meant I was well prepared - quoting the legal duties and objectives of councillors all about ‘educating, informing, consulting with the public’.
Cr Norman Lee (father of Ben Lee in fact) as conservative independent was particularly p*ssed off at hearing this intellectual rebuttal of what I am pretty sure he thought was a lay down misere: I was an ex officio board member/co-director of the very same facility half owned by Waverley and Woollahra councils, campaigning to close it down, as per the express election platform.
What I imagine particularly upset the power clique was sending a media release to then EPA director Neil Shepherd (the guy 5 years earlier who bumped Terry Metherell MP from a sinecure by refusing to move on, presaging an ICAC inquiry into him and Tim Moore MP and Nick Greiner back in 1992). And not just any media release - I called Shepherd’s secretary and had it delivered off their hot fax machine into a live meeting with same ALP Mayor and co lobbyists out at Chatswood EPA head office. Sort of spoiled their whole vibe.
The dioxin spewing monster was closed courtesy EPA, and diverse other forces including developer lobby South Sydney Council under Vic Smith. The Waverley council leadership spilled to a greener hue. AND Waverley no longer had any reason to be matey with co-owners Woollahra and annexed the rest of Bondi Junction which is why Westfield is all in Waverley now, but not then. And I still had a diabolical 2 years to serve, 2 years ahead of schedule. Mmm.
God bless the LG Act clauses on role and objectives of councillors to exercise free speech. It also helps if you have no assets and a law degree.
Re: Skype… one reason why you shouldn’t read that article: it’s rubbish.