<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The death penalty: clumsy, costly and morally dubious</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:14:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liquid Len</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38439</link>
		<dc:creator>Liquid Len</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38439</guid>
		<description>I would just like to congratulate LIZ45 on her post which is both accurate and shows that CIVILIZED societies can and do approach the vexed issue of punishing and rehabilitating criminals whilst actually working on reducing recidivist behavior.

The attitude to sex offenders is also based on releasing an offender in a controlled manner and with continuing behavior modification techniques which actually work.

To be noted is that Norway takes many offences such as drink driving seriously as is shown by this incidence as reported by -

http://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/2009/05/my-kind-of-drunk-driving-sentence-in-norway.html

“A Norwegian businessman was ordered on Tuesday to pay a fine of 700,000 kroner for driving 400m while drunk, a court said.  Due to the man&#039;s wealth, the court in the southern Norwegian county of Aust-Agder handed down a heavier-than-usual sentence, which would normally be equivalent to a month-and-a-half&#039;s gross salary for the accused. 

&quot;The principle of proportionality implies that we should take into account the entire wealth of the person in cases where the defendant is more well off than most other people,&quot; a copy of the verdict obtained by AFP read. 
The 49-year-old man is the heir of a rich shipping family.... The man was also ordered to take part in an alcohol rehabilitation programme — failing which he will have to serve 18 days in jail — and he had his driver&#039;s licence suspended for two years and three months. 

The man was arrested in October 2008 after he was found to have more than nine times the permitted blood-alcohol level an hour after he was stopped by police. The man told the court that he had only driven 300 to 400m, and that, aware of his condition, he was going to meet friends to ask them to take him home.”

The United States should be seen as an example of how not to approach Law Enforcement, Punishment and most importantly the levels of society and how some levels are protected from their “just deserts” and other levels receive no justice at all.

Would it not be wonderful if Australia followed the good examples of the enlightened countries rather than fall in behind a nation some call, with some perceived accuracy, “The Great Satan”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would just like to congratulate LIZ45 on her post which is both accurate and shows that CIVILIZED societies can and do approach the vexed issue of punishing and rehabilitating criminals whilst actually working on reducing recidivist behavior.</p>
<p>The attitude to sex offenders is also based on releasing an offender in a controlled manner and with continuing behavior modification techniques which actually work.</p>
<p>To be noted is that Norway takes many offences such as drink driving seriously as is shown by this incidence as reported by -</p>
<p><a href="http://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/2009/05/my-kind-of-drunk-driving-sentence-in-norway.html" rel="nofollow">http://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/2009/05/my-kind-of-drunk-driving-sentence-in-norway.html</a></p>
<p>“A Norwegian businessman was ordered on Tuesday to pay a fine of 700,000 kroner for driving 400m while drunk, a court said.  Due to the man&#8217;s wealth, the court in the southern Norwegian county of Aust-Agder handed down a heavier-than-usual sentence, which would normally be equivalent to a month-and-a-half&#8217;s gross salary for the accused. </p>
<p><span class="dquo">&#8220;</span>The principle of proportionality implies that we should take into account the entire wealth of the person in cases where the defendant is more well off than most other people,&#8221; a copy of the verdict obtained by AFP read.<br />
The 49-year-old man is the heir of a rich shipping family&#8230;. The man was also ordered to take part in an alcohol rehabilitation programme — failing which he will have to serve 18 days in jail — and he had his driver&#8217;s licence suspended for two years and three months. </p>
<p>The man was arrested in October 2008 after he was found to have more than nine times the permitted blood-alcohol level an hour after he was stopped by police. The man told the court that he had only driven 300 to 400m, and that, aware of his condition, he was going to meet friends to ask them to take him home.”</p>
<p>The United States should be seen as an example of how not to approach Law Enforcement, Punishment and most importantly the levels of society and how some levels are protected from their “just deserts” and other levels receive no justice at all.</p>
<p>Would it not be wonderful if Australia followed the good examples of the enlightened countries rather than fall in behind a nation some call, with some perceived accuracy, “The Great Satan”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter obrien</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38426</link>
		<dc:creator>peter obrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38426</guid>
		<description>The death penalty is brutal ritualized murder............it&#039;s hypocritical to force the the terminally ill to suffer indefinite terrible pain because of the criminalization of euthanasia.

Strangely most of those US citizens who support the death penalty see euthanasia to stop suffering as murder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The death penalty is brutal ritualized murder&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;it&#8217;s hypocritical to force the the terminally ill to suffer indefinite terrible pain because of the criminalization of euthanasia.</p>
<p>Strangely most of those US citizens who support the death penalty see euthanasia to stop suffering as murder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38257</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38257</guid>
		<description>Euthanasia is a different topic Most Peculiar Mama, and needs to be paid more than just lip service on a blog site. Just about anyone who has watched somebody die slowly and horribly, has a particular view on this topic. I would hate to see anyone belittled for either supporting or not supporting it. But I would like to see it opened up for a national debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Euthanasia is a different topic Most Peculiar Mama, and needs to be paid more than just lip service on a blog site. Just about anyone who has watched somebody die slowly and horribly, has a particular view on this topic. I would hate to see anyone belittled for either supporting or not supporting it. But I would like to see it opened up for a national debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Loggie</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38248</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Loggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38248</guid>
		<description>&quot;..I find it hilarious that the same people who find capital punishment “abhorrent” fully support partial birth abortions up to 23 weeks and enthusiastically support euthanasia...&quot;

I find nothing hilarious with the hypocrisy of so many &quot;right to lifers&quot; who also clamor for death as a form of penalty. 

The real question that needs to be thoroughly tested is; does bringing forward a persons death deliver true justice, is the act of terminating a persons life relevant as a penalty in civilised communities?

I suggest not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221;..I find it hilarious that the same people who find capital punishment “abhorrent” fully support partial birth abortions up to 23 weeks and enthusiastically support euthanasia&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I find nothing hilarious with the hypocrisy of so many &#8220;right to lifers&#8221; who also clamor for death as a form of penalty. </p>
<p>The real question that needs to be thoroughly tested is; does bringing forward a persons death deliver true justice, is the act of terminating a persons life relevant as a penalty in civilised communities?</p>
<p>I suggest not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Most Peculiar Mama</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38217</link>
		<dc:creator>Most Peculiar Mama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 07:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38217</guid>
		<description>&quot;...I find the death penalty abhorrent - it’s state sponsored murder in my view...&quot;

I find it hilarious that the same people who find capital punishment &quot;abhorrent&quot; fully support partial birth abortions up to 23 weeks and enthusiastically support euthanasia.

The hypocrisy is stunning.

If abortion was illegal America&#039;s population would be closer to 400 million.

That&#039;s a lot of state-sponsored dead kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="dquo">&#8220;</span>&#8230;I find the death penalty abhorrent - it’s state sponsored murder in my view&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I find it hilarious that the same people who find capital punishment &#8220;abhorrent&#8221; fully support partial birth abortions up to 23 weeks and enthusiastically support euthanasia.</p>
<p>The hypocrisy is stunning.</p>
<p>If abortion was illegal America&#8217;s population would be closer to 400 million.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a lot of state-sponsored dead kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: merlot64</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38172</link>
		<dc:creator>merlot64</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 03:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38172</guid>
		<description>I oppose death as a penalty. I believe that  most punitive responses to crime are ineffective at best and counter productive at worst. 

But rabid dogs are shot. There are some crimes where the guilt is beyond doubt and the crime so horrific that the persons responsible can have no place in human society. I&#039;m talking about cases like Anita Cobby. 

It&#039;s not that the persons deserve to die, but they could never be rehabilitated and would remain a constant threat, either to other prisoners or warders or the community at large.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I oppose death as a penalty. I believe that  most punitive responses to crime are ineffective at best and counter productive at worst. </p>
<p>But rabid dogs are shot. There are some crimes where the guilt is beyond doubt and the crime so horrific that the persons responsible can have no place in human society. I&#8217;m talking about cases like Anita Cobby. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that the persons deserve to die, but they could never be rehabilitated and would remain a constant threat, either to other prisoners or warders or the community at large.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38161</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 23:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38161</guid>
		<description>I have to admit, while I am opposed to the death penalty and always will be, I will find it hard to shed a tear for Romel Broom after reading what he did.

But if it were up to me, I would ban capital punishment. It is an outdated form of punishment belonging to a less civilised society (&#039;legalised murder&#039; is a good name for it). Society needs to move forward.

Finally, I could not connect the dots in Liz45&#039;s arguement about Norway having those super friendly jails and crime being down. I believe there would have to be other contributing factors for the low crime rates - any ideas anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit, while I am opposed to the death penalty and always will be, I will find it hard to shed a tear for Romel Broom after reading what he did.</p>
<p>But if it were up to me, I would ban capital punishment. It is an outdated form of punishment belonging to a less civilised society (&#8216;legalised murder&#8217; is a good name for it). Society needs to move forward.</p>
<p>Finally, I could not connect the dots in Liz45&#8217;s arguement about Norway having those super friendly jails and crime being down. I believe there would have to be other contributing factors for the low crime rates - any ideas anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz45</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38159</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 13:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38159</guid>
		<description>Recently, I watched a documentary on Norway. There is no sentence longer than 20 years, regardless of the crime. The jail is on an island, and the &#039;inmates&#039; aren&#039;t locked up as such, they live in homes/barracks that have all modern conveniences, about 5-6 to a dwelling. They go out to work each day and prepare their own meals etc. The &#039;warders&#039; walk around without any weapons, and the atmosphere is jovial and peaceful. Norway has the lowest murder rate in the world. The police don&#039;t carry weapons either. In recent years, the US wanted Norway to return an american citizen to face serious charges, and the high court in Norway refused, as they believed the prisons in the US were inhumane and should be against International Law. Food for thought? 
In Australia, there&#039;s been the practice for too many years, of politicians of both major parties trying to outdo each other over &#039;law and order&#039; issues leading up to state elections. It has nothing to do with prevention or rehabilitation. We now have a situation in NSW, where juveniles are being locked up in mainstream prisons while awaiting their case being heard - all this does is act as an educational tool for being &#039;smarter&#039; criminals? Sometimes the young person is found to be innocent, and/or doesn&#039;t face a prison sentence, but the damage could already be done. We also lock up too many people with drug or alcohol problems, and sadly, too many with a mental illness. The State health systems are in such a mess, that the  so-called leaders are obviously quite content for the prison system to do the job???In the NT, an overwhelming number of people in prison are aboriginal; and usually for &#039;crimes&#039; that non-aboriginal people would possibly/probably not get a custodial sentence. Life in prison without any hope of release should only be kept for the most heinous crimes - like Ivan Milat and the killers of Anita Cobby for example. If you remove the hope that people can be rehabilitated somewhere down the track, it says more about the rest of us, and our attitudes to any ability for change. There are plenty of examples of people, with the right programs and time, who&#039;ve been able to leave jail and become a &#039;good&#039; citizen.

In the US, the overwhelming number of people in jail are black and poor! I recall the hypocrisy of George W and the poor woman who was brain dead, but he fought to prevent her life support being switched off - this from a person who signed 137 death warrants, and is responsible for 1.3 million dead Iraqis, and who knows how many Afghanis. The hypocrisy really gets to me. The woman&#039;s family won the court appeal, and the poor woman did die soon after. To some, there are people and then there&#039;s the others - the &#039;unpeople&#039;?

I believe the death penalty is state sponsored murder, as I believe the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are state sponsored terrorism on a grand scale! The so-called &#039;leaders&#039; should have to lead the way in any wars they engage in, start or promote - that might change things considerably? Their families should be made to follow them. It&#039;s too easy for some people to send other peoples&#039; kids to kill and be killed! It&#039;s immoral and unjust!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, I watched a documentary on Norway. There is no sentence longer than 20 years, regardless of the crime. The jail is on an island, and the &#8216;inmates&#8217; aren&#8217;t locked up as such, they live in homes/barracks that have all modern conveniences, about 5-6 to a dwelling. They go out to work each day and prepare their own meals etc. The &#8216;warders&#8217; walk around without any weapons, and the atmosphere is jovial and peaceful. Norway has the lowest murder rate in the world. The police don&#8217;t carry weapons either. In recent years, the US wanted Norway to return an american citizen to face serious charges, and the high court in Norway refused, as they believed the prisons in the US were inhumane and should be against International Law. Food for thought?<br />
In Australia, there&#8217;s been the practice for too many years, of politicians of both major parties trying to outdo each other over &#8216;law and order&#8217; issues leading up to state elections. It has nothing to do with prevention or rehabilitation. We now have a situation in NSW, where juveniles are being locked up in mainstream prisons while awaiting their case being heard - all this does is act as an educational tool for being &#8216;smarter&#8217; criminals? Sometimes the young person is found to be innocent, and/or doesn&#8217;t face a prison sentence, but the damage could already be done. We also lock up too many people with drug or alcohol problems, and sadly, too many with a mental illness. The State health systems are in such a mess, that the  so-called leaders are obviously quite content for the prison system to do the job???In the NT, an overwhelming number of people in prison are aboriginal; and usually for &#8216;crimes&#8217; that non-aboriginal people would possibly/probably not get a custodial sentence. Life in prison without any hope of release should only be kept for the most heinous crimes - like Ivan Milat and the killers of Anita Cobby for example. If you remove the hope that people can be rehabilitated somewhere down the track, it says more about the rest of us, and our attitudes to any ability for change. There are plenty of examples of people, with the right programs and time, who&#8217;ve been able to leave jail and become a &#8216;good&#8217; citizen.</p>
<p>In the US, the overwhelming number of people in jail are black and poor! I recall the hypocrisy of George W and the poor woman who was brain dead, but he fought to prevent her life support being switched off - this from a person who signed 137 death warrants, and is responsible for 1.3 million dead Iraqis, and who knows how many Afghanis. The hypocrisy really gets to me. The woman&#8217;s family won the court appeal, and the poor woman did die soon after. To some, there are people and then there&#8217;s the others - the &#8216;unpeople&#8217;?</p>
<p>I believe the death penalty is state sponsored murder, as I believe the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are state sponsored terrorism on a grand scale! The so-called &#8216;leaders&#8217; should have to lead the way in any wars they engage in, start or promote - that might change things considerably? Their families should be made to follow them. It&#8217;s too easy for some people to send other peoples&#8217; kids to kill and be killed! It&#8217;s immoral and unjust!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asdusty</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38152</link>
		<dc:creator>asdusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 07:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38152</guid>
		<description>If citizens dont have the right to take anothers life, then neither should the state.  The harshest punishment the state should be able to give is to take away the ability to participate in society.  That is life in prison with no possibility for release.  Every effort should be made to treat that prisoner with humanity, to remind the criminal how he should behave in society, and serve not to justify any percieved wrongs.  And the convicted criminal can have access to voluntary euthanasia, so he or she can usher themselves off this mortal coil when they so choose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If citizens dont have the right to take anothers life, then neither should the state.  The harshest punishment the state should be able to give is to take away the ability to participate in society.  That is life in prison with no possibility for release.  Every effort should be made to treat that prisoner with humanity, to remind the criminal how he should behave in society, and serve not to justify any percieved wrongs.  And the convicted criminal can have access to voluntary euthanasia, so he or she can usher themselves off this mortal coil when they so choose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Loggie</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38149</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Loggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38149</guid>
		<description>This discussion really forms part of a defining debate in our understanding of life and death and our inherent fear and ignorance of the actual process of dying and death.

I find it totally incongruous that this form of state sponsored euthanasia can be held up as the &quot;ultimate penalty&quot; in justice systems around the world where those same societies prohibit sane and considered decisions of the terminally ill to choose the timing of their own death.

Death has no relationship to penalty or justice. Death brought on in this way is simply wrong and barbaric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This discussion really forms part of a defining debate in our understanding of life and death and our inherent fear and ignorance of the actual process of dying and death.</p>
<p>I find it totally incongruous that this form of state sponsored euthanasia can be held up as the &#8220;ultimate penalty&#8221; in justice systems around the world where those same societies prohibit sane and considered decisions of the terminally ill to choose the timing of their own death.</p>
<p>Death has no relationship to penalty or justice. Death brought on in this way is simply wrong and barbaric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: micae</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38145</link>
		<dc:creator>micae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38145</guid>
		<description>It is hypocritical to have a law against killing and then to kill someone whoever they are and whatever they have done.
&#039;Do as I say not as I do&#039; ...


In addition the number of people who are wrongfully convicted is appalling. Thankfully we no longer have capital punishment. In our State we have had John Button and Andrew Mallard convicted and having to spend respectively 12 years and 5 years in jail for murders they did not commit. Button is currently helping to fight for Greer&#039;s case (another convicted murderer) to be reassessed and with good grounds.
Bad enough they have lost years of their lives, been hated on and meanwhile of course the real killers have been allowed to roam the land unrestrained - at least they have not been put to death as they would have been had we still had the death penalty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is hypocritical to have a law against killing and then to kill someone whoever they are and whatever they have done.<br />
&#8216;Do as I say not as I do&#8217; &#8230;</p>
<p>In addition the number of people who are wrongfully convicted is appalling. Thankfully we no longer have capital punishment. In our State we have had John Button and Andrew Mallard convicted and having to spend respectively 12 years and 5 years in jail for murders they did not commit. Button is currently helping to fight for Greer&#8217;s case (another convicted murderer) to be reassessed and with good grounds.<br />
Bad enough they have lost years of their lives, been hated on and meanwhile of course the real killers have been allowed to roam the land unrestrained - at least they have not been put to death as they would have been had we still had the death penalty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dano</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38144</link>
		<dc:creator>Dano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38144</guid>
		<description>Whatever  happened to the  firing  squad? ..  never heard of that  failing ..and it  sends a  loud message to the  crims .  Have the US  forgotten  how to use  guns? ..I don&#039;t think so .   And  to all the bleeding hearts out there please   don&#039;t lecture me on killing or the &#039;rights of  killers&#039; or their  broken  childhoods .. I  don&#039;t  want to hear  .   A  collective  has and always  will defend itself against threats   using  lethal force or it will perish like any other  failed animal species   . Thats how  nature  works  and thats why we have a  military  to protect the us  sheep from the wolves  .  Fact is  there are wolves  out there who are a real threat and  they must be  dealt with or  else the lawless  will control the  lawful . For example witness  Mexico today- its out of control to drug lords  -in fact its a civil  war as big  as  Iraq!! .  In this country  organised  crime gangs are a real threat and must be destroyed .  These wolves- like  bikie  gangs -will destroy us  if we let them .  And  why are  bikie gangs feared and effective ?  Because like wolves  they hunt in packs . They &#039;ve  learned that an organised  collective is   far stronger  than a group of   individualist  rabble  . Wolves  can easily  prey on SHEEP if  there are no  shepherds. 

From some &#039;  gay  liberal pointy headed  imbecile&#039;  comes the  nonsense   &#039; better 99 guilty  go free  than one  innocent  die &#039; ..WHAT  UTTER RUBBISH .. the innocent die every  day -- ask an Afghan --..usually by US  bombs  .. So ok  well lets open the jail  doors and let all the crims   go because  we all know that  there might  ONE  innocent in jail ,and there are .. ....You see how ridiculous the  gay liberals  are ?  With  them its  all about ME and  MY  RIGHTS and  &#039;what if it was you? &#039;  blah blah   and the  universe  revolves  around ME ME and ME  etc etc. You see  how  corrupt selfish  and  perverse gay  liberals are ?  They are  so corrupted with their own  miserable wretched existence..they bring  NOTHING for the rest of us  . They  just  don&#039;t  get it ---only the collective  survives . . Its  not ALL  ABOUT  ME ..it never  was . These perserve individualist  ideals can often  be  traced to the USA with its protestant individual salvation and the  myth of the rugged individual  translated into individual consumer capitalism  which conveniently maximises profits.  The collective rights  are not mentioned.  Well  that&#039;s  them  NOT US  . Frankly the US is   a country  &#039; off the  rails&#039;  and we are fools to follow that wayward sick country which  can&#039;t  even organise an  execution . 

A simple way to deal with  criminals  is to strip them of  citizenship  which ,afterall, most of  us took  for  granted and  got   for  nothing unlike my  father  who fought for it in New Guinea .. But that  was in the days  when it was  God King and Country .... not ME  ME and oh  ME but not you . Western society  today is a decaying  worm eaten corpse  riddled by  CORRUPT individualist gay liberals who have  their voices heard  in a press  controlled  by  THEM  for THEM.

Citizenship should  work like  this ---  No  citizenship due to a serious crime ? then  leave the country  within  30 days or be indefinitely  detained ! Alternatively  you can work to get  you citizenship back by works and deeds and  commit no crime for 10 years . Afterall thats  how  Australia GOT  STARTED FOLKS ..think about it..read your  history .. Citizenship should be kept bright and  shiny for all to see.

We have  become too obsessed with the  rights of the individual and  even the  rights of  criminals- witness Dennis Fergusen for example  with &#039;his rights&#039; being  quoted at us   by gay  liberal noisebags - HE HAS  NO RIGHTS ..  HE  FORFEITED  HIS RIGHTS as a  citizen  DECADES AGO --that wolf belongs on a  rope.    Corrupting gay  liberal  speak- easys  do not understand   the rights of the  collective and the concept of  citizenship and thats why  western society   is slowly and  surely  failing as we can all see every day .  But don&#039;t  worry all you  gay liberals  , Islam is  very patient and will fill the void  you have  created with your  corrupt  &#039;fashionable  views&#039; .  I can  assure  you Islam  can  deal with criminals. 
 
Oh  and bring  back the  death penalty and  get  rid of the   wolves before they eat us .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever  happened to the  firing  squad? ..  never heard of that  failing ..and it  sends a  loud message to the  crims .  Have the US  forgotten  how to use  guns? ..I don&#8217;t think so .   And  to all the bleeding hearts out there please   don&#8217;t lecture me on killing or the &#8216;rights of  killers&#8217; or their  broken  childhoods .. I  don&#8217;t  want to hear  .   A  collective  has and always  will defend itself against threats   using  lethal force or it will perish like any other  failed animal species   . Thats how  nature  works  and thats why we have a  military  to protect the us  sheep from the wolves  .  Fact is  there are wolves  out there who are a real threat and  they must be  dealt with or  else the lawless  will control the  lawful . For example witness  Mexico today- its out of control to drug lords  -in fact its a civil  war as big  as  Iraq!! .  In this country  organised  crime gangs are a real threat and must be destroyed .  These wolves- like  bikie  gangs -will destroy us  if we let them .  And  why are  bikie gangs feared and effective ?  Because like wolves  they hunt in packs . They &#8216;ve  learned that an organised  collective is   far stronger  than a group of   individualist  rabble  . Wolves  can easily  prey on SHEEP if  there are no  shepherds. </p>
<p>From some &#8217;  gay  liberal pointy headed  imbecile&#8217;  comes the  nonsense   &#8217; better 99 guilty  go free  than one  innocent  die &#8217; ..WHAT  UTTER RUBBISH .. the innocent die every  day&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;ask an Afghan&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;..usually by US  bombs  .. So ok  well lets open the jail  doors and let all the crims   go because  we all know that  there might  ONE  innocent in jail ,and there are .. &#8230;.You see how ridiculous the  gay liberals  are ?  With  them its  all about ME and  MY  RIGHTS and  &#8216;what if it was you? &#8217;  blah blah   and the  universe  revolves  around ME ME and ME  etc etc. You see  how  corrupt selfish  and  perverse gay  liberals are ?  They are  so corrupted with their own  miserable wretched existence..they bring  NOTHING for the rest of us  . They  just  don&#8217;t  get it&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;-only the collective  survives . . Its  not ALL  ABOUT  ME ..it never  was . These perserve individualist  ideals can often  be  traced to the USA with its protestant individual salvation and the  myth of the rugged individual  translated into individual consumer capitalism  which conveniently maximises profits.  The collective rights  are not mentioned.  Well  that&#8217;s  them  NOT US  . Frankly the US is   a country  &#8217; off the  rails&#8217;  and we are fools to follow that wayward sick country which  can&#8217;t  even organise an  execution . </p>
<p>A simple way to deal with  criminals  is to strip them of  citizenship  which ,afterall, most of  us took  for  granted and  got   for  nothing unlike my  father  who fought for it in New Guinea .. But that  was in the days  when it was  God King and Country &#8230;. not ME  ME and oh  ME but not you . Western society  today is a decaying  worm eaten corpse  riddled by  CORRUPT individualist gay liberals who have  their voices heard  in a press  controlled  by  THEM  for THEM.</p>
<p>Citizenship should  work like  this&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;-  No  citizenship due to a serious crime ? then  leave the country  within  30 days or be indefinitely  detained ! Alternatively  you can work to get  you citizenship back by works and deeds and  commit no crime for 10 years . Afterall thats  how  Australia GOT  STARTED FOLKS ..think about it..read your  history .. Citizenship should be kept bright and  shiny for all to see.</p>
<p>We have  become too obsessed with the  rights of the individual and  even the  rights of  criminals- witness Dennis Fergusen for example  with &#8216;his rights&#8217; being  quoted at us   by gay  liberal noisebags - HE HAS  NO RIGHTS ..  HE  FORFEITED  HIS RIGHTS as a  citizen  DECADES AGO&thinsp;&#8212;&thinsp;that wolf belongs on a  rope.    Corrupting gay  liberal  speak- easys  do not understand   the rights of the  collective and the concept of  citizenship and thats why  western society   is slowly and  surely  failing as we can all see every day .  But don&#8217;t  worry all you  gay liberals  , Islam is  very patient and will fill the void  you have  created with your  corrupt  &#8216;fashionable  views&#8217; .  I can  assure  you Islam  can  deal with criminals. </p>
<p>Oh  and bring  back the  death penalty and  get  rid of the   wolves before they eat us .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesK</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38138</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38138</guid>
		<description>@Altakoi. The &quot;technically capabable people&quot; are anesthetists and they rightly refuse to  assist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Altakoi. The &#8220;technically capabable people&#8221; are anesthetists and they rightly refuse to  assist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Altakoi</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38132</link>
		<dc:creator>Altakoi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 07:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38132</guid>
		<description>Leaving aside the debate about the merits of the death penalty itself, I have often wondered why it is that there are so many horror stories of bungled lethal injections. Death by lethal injection is just a bad anaesthetic. It takes years of training to avoid killing people by lethal injection, so how can people fail to be able to acheive it reliably when its their job to do so. Perhaps they need more technically capabable people and a better mix of drugs. Up the dose, add some barbiturates. Its not like side effects are an issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leaving aside the debate about the merits of the death penalty itself, I have often wondered why it is that there are so many horror stories of bungled lethal injections. Death by lethal injection is just a bad anaesthetic. It takes years of training to avoid killing people by lethal injection, so how can people fail to be able to acheive it reliably when its their job to do so. Perhaps they need more technically capabable people and a better mix of drugs. Up the dose, add some barbiturates. Its not like side effects are an issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz45</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38124</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38124</guid>
		<description>RENA  - I didn&#039;t agree with the so-called Bali bombers being executed. The main reason, I&#039;m against capital punishment, full stop. I&#039;m still not convinced that the Indonesian Military weren&#039;t involved; let&#039;s face it, the &#039;accused&#039; weren&#039;t really very bright were they? The guilty people should&#039;ve been in jail for ever, like GEF05 said.

I also abhor state sponsored terrorism, that is, the illegal invasion of countries and murdering innocent people, who were no threat to the US or Australia - over 1.3 million in Iraq, and maybe the same in Afghanistan. Nobody cares enough to even keep count of the dead! We &#039;regret&#039; the deaths of Australian service people; we express moral outrage at over 80 Australians killed in Bali, but we remain silent over the x number of &#039;Balis&#039; every day in Afghanistan &amp; Iraq. We&#039;ve destroyed those countries, and enabled horrific injuries and diseases to take over. There are too many innocent men and boys still in Iraqi jails, just because they oppose being occupied and seeing their family members killed and maimed! I despair!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RENA  - I didn&#8217;t agree with the so-called Bali bombers being executed. The main reason, I&#8217;m against capital punishment, full stop. I&#8217;m still not convinced that the Indonesian Military weren&#8217;t involved; let&#8217;s face it, the &#8216;accused&#8217; weren&#8217;t really very bright were they? The guilty people should&#8217;ve been in jail for ever, like GEF05 said.</p>
<p>I also abhor state sponsored terrorism, that is, the illegal invasion of countries and murdering innocent people, who were no threat to the US or Australia - over 1.3 million in Iraq, and maybe the same in Afghanistan. Nobody cares enough to even keep count of the dead! We &#8216;regret&#8217; the deaths of Australian service people; we express moral outrage at over 80 Australians killed in Bali, but we remain silent over the x number of &#8216;Balis&#8217; every day in Afghanistan &amp; Iraq. We&#8217;ve destroyed those countries, and enabled horrific injuries and diseases to take over. There are too many innocent men and boys still in Iraqi jails, just because they oppose being occupied and seeing their family members killed and maimed! I despair!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gef05</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38120</link>
		<dc:creator>gef05</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38120</guid>
		<description>It is sad that we still debate such issues. Personally, I believe killing is wrong, and therefore the death penalty should not exist. 

@ Rena
&quot;We do not mind capital punishment for i.e Bali bombers...&quot; 
Really? You&#039;ve heard people take this position? For me, they need to sit in jail for the rest of their lives after facing trial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is sad that we still debate such issues. Personally, I believe killing is wrong, and therefore the death penalty should not exist. </p>
<p>@ Rena<br />
&#8220;We do not mind capital punishment for i.e Bali bombers&#8230;&#8221;<br />
Really? You&#8217;ve heard people take this position? For me, they need to sit in jail for the rest of their lives after facing trial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rena Zurawel</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38110</link>
		<dc:creator>Rena Zurawel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38110</guid>
		<description>Our attitude towards the death penalty is sometimes intriguing, to say the least. We do not mind capital punishment for i.e Bali bombers, &#039;islamic terrorists&#039;, or Iraqi scientists or many, many civilians being killed without a trial  because &#039;they might be associated with terrorists&#039;.
I would probably support capital punishment providing we, in the West at least, had independent juidiciary and squeaky clean lawmakers..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our attitude towards the death penalty is sometimes intriguing, to say the least. We do not mind capital punishment for i.e Bali bombers, &#8216;islamic terrorists&#8217;, or Iraqi scientists or many, many civilians being killed without a trial  because &#8216;they might be associated with terrorists&#8217;.<br />
I would probably support capital punishment providing we, in the West at least, had independent juidiciary and squeaky clean lawmakers..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz45</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38095</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38095</guid>
		<description>PS. This man was a guest on Richard Fydlers, Conversation Hour on ABC Radio. The interviews can be accessed on the internet! Very interesting person with an amazing story to tell. How he selects his clients; how his students go about the research etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS. This man was a guest on Richard Fydlers, Conversation Hour on ABC Radio. The interviews can be accessed on the internet! Very interesting person with an amazing story to tell. How he selects his clients; how his students go about the research etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz45</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38094</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38094</guid>
		<description>There was a  lawyer from the US visiting Australia a month or so ago. He&#039;s a Professor who teachers at a major University in the US. He takes up cases of people on death row who have always asserted their innocence. This started with his students becoming involved in a case - they do the &#039;leg work&#039; which includes interviewing relevant people, visiting the crime scene and having many discussions with the convicted person - all too frequently poor and black! His relevations were horrifying. They included the fact, that all too frequently the neighbourhood cop has little or no experience in homicides; doesn&#039;t ensure that the crime scene is forensically examined and protected; takes the word of so-called witnesses who, in too many cases aren&#039;t definite, or even not been able to pick the person in a line-up; and all too frequently, racism is a factor - every black person looks the same scenario! If the convicted person admitted guilt somewhere along the line, then that&#039;s it - it often involves innocent people being executed. 

What I found really chilling, was the Judges often comment, that to reopen the case or admit that the convicted person is innocent, would result in the people losing faith in the justice system. Killing innocent people is better than the justice system being embarrassed? As the Professor said, they don&#039;t wonder what impression the people have when they know that innocent people have been executed. I recall reading, that while George W Bush was Governor of Texas, he signed 137 death warrants. At the time of the article, there were at least  9 of those subsequently found to be innocent - there&#039;s probably more now. Too late after the person is dead! Oooopppps! Sorry! doesn&#039;t really suffice does it?

I find the death penalty abhorrent - it&#039;s state sponsored murder in my view. It&#039;s saying, &#039;we don&#039;t know what to do with you, so we&#039;ll kill you&#039;? It&#039;s been proven, that it doesn&#039;t act as a deterrent, and it&#039;s all about revenge, not justice. White rich criminals, including murderers, frequently/always get off. You get the justice you can afford to pay for in too many cases!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a  lawyer from the US visiting Australia a month or so ago. He&#8217;s a Professor who teachers at a major University in the US. He takes up cases of people on death row who have always asserted their innocence. This started with his students becoming involved in a case - they do the &#8216;leg work&#8217; which includes interviewing relevant people, visiting the crime scene and having many discussions with the convicted person - all too frequently poor and black! His relevations were horrifying. They included the fact, that all too frequently the neighbourhood cop has little or no experience in homicides; doesn&#8217;t ensure that the crime scene is forensically examined and protected; takes the word of so-called witnesses who, in too many cases aren&#8217;t definite, or even not been able to pick the person in a line-up; and all too frequently, racism is a factor - every black person looks the same scenario! If the convicted person admitted guilt somewhere along the line, then that&#8217;s it - it often involves innocent people being executed. </p>
<p>What I found really chilling, was the Judges often comment, that to reopen the case or admit that the convicted person is innocent, would result in the people losing faith in the justice system. Killing innocent people is better than the justice system being embarrassed? As the Professor said, they don&#8217;t wonder what impression the people have when they know that innocent people have been executed. I recall reading, that while George W Bush was Governor of Texas, he signed 137 death warrants. At the time of the article, there were at least  9 of those subsequently found to be innocent - there&#8217;s probably more now. Too late after the person is dead! Oooopppps! Sorry! doesn&#8217;t really suffice does it?</p>
<p>I find the death penalty abhorrent - it&#8217;s state sponsored murder in my view. It&#8217;s saying, &#8216;we don&#8217;t know what to do with you, so we&#8217;ll kill you&#8217;? It&#8217;s been proven, that it doesn&#8217;t act as a deterrent, and it&#8217;s all about revenge, not justice. White rich criminals, including murderers, frequently/always get off. You get the justice you can afford to pay for in too many cases!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acannon</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38088</link>
		<dc:creator>acannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/the-death-penalty-clumsy-costly-and-morally-dubious/#comment-38088</guid>
		<description>Are the other alternatives? I&#039;d be interested to hear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the other alternatives? I&#8217;d be interested to hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1040/1050 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 18:24:57 -->
