Comments on: Editor on a G-string: the Penberthy-Dye emails http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/16/editor-on-a-g-string-the-penberthy-dye-emails/ now with extra source Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:48:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: damnumalone http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/16/editor-on-a-g-string-the-penberthy-dye-emails/#comment-37886 damnumalone Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:37:56 +0000 http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/16/editor-on-a-g-string-the-penberthy-dye-emails/#comment-37886 The point was, Crikey and the Telegraph are having disagreements this week. Unfortunately, it appears that Crikey's observations are just as petty and biassed as the Telegraph's. The point was, Crikey and the Telegraph are having disagreements this week.

Unfortunately, it appears that Crikey’s observations are just as petty and biassed as the Telegraph’s.

]]> By: Sarah Byrne http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/16/editor-on-a-g-string-the-penberthy-dye-emails/#comment-37852 Sarah Byrne Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:53:09 +0000 http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/16/editor-on-a-g-string-the-penberthy-dye-emails/#comment-37852 Me neither. Are Blomfeld's lawyers trying to suggest that a woman who flirts with one man must necessarily be inviting overtures from all men? Can't see how these would be relevant to anything - if Dye were suing Penberthy, they might have a point. Me neither. Are Blomfeld’s lawyers trying to suggest that a woman who flirts with one man must necessarily be inviting overtures from all men? Can’t see how these would be relevant to anything - if Dye were suing Penberthy, they might have a point.

]]> By: Murray Hall http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/16/editor-on-a-g-string-the-penberthy-dye-emails/#comment-37818 Murray Hall Wed, 16 Sep 2009 05:26:37 +0000 http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/16/editor-on-a-g-string-the-penberthy-dye-emails/#comment-37818 Not sure what the problem is. Not sure what the problem is.

]]>