<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Suncorp remuneration a case of market failure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/14/suncorp-remuneration-a-case-of-market-failure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/14/suncorp-remuneration-a-case-of-market-failure/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:48:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: james mcdonald</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/14/suncorp-remuneration-a-case-of-market-failure/#comment-37616</link>
		<dc:creator>james mcdonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/14/suncorp-remuneration-a-case-of-market-failure/#comment-37616</guid>
		<description>And free global currency markets would not have enabled China&#039;s undervalued yuan (which amounts to a tarriff on all imports and subsidy of all exports), their quarantining of excess trade profits from the domestic economy, and purchase of all the bonds the US could print no matter how low the interest rate, using those excess profits. Thus enabling the Reserve to keep those rates ridiculously low, so that consumers could borrow too much, too cheaply, to buy too many subsidized Chinese exports.  And then there&#039;s the artificially easy money for housing which has been commented many times.

Come to think of it, where was this free market we keep hearing about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And free global currency markets would not have enabled China&#8217;s undervalued yuan (which amounts to a tarriff on all imports and subsidy of all exports), their quarantining of excess trade profits from the domestic economy, and purchase of all the bonds the US could print no matter how low the interest rate, using those excess profits. Thus enabling the Reserve to keep those rates ridiculously low, so that consumers could borrow too much, too cheaply, to buy too many subsidized Chinese exports.  And then there&#8217;s the artificially easy money for housing which has been commented many times.</p>
<p>Come to think of it, where was this free market we keep hearing about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 446/456 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 14:15:18 -->
