<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Della Bosca sexes up NSW politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/02/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups-72/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/02/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups-72/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:48:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: meski</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/02/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups-72/#comment-36426</link>
		<dc:creator>meski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/02/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups-72/#comment-36426</guid>
		<description>@Sharon:  So you &#039;treasure&#039; our national parks, and at the same time are willing to let feral animals destroy them?  Seems like a contradiction there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sharon:  So you &#8216;treasure&#8217; our national parks, and at the same time are willing to let feral animals destroy them?  Seems like a contradiction there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamas Calderwood</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/02/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups-72/#comment-36410</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamas Calderwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/02/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups-72/#comment-36410</guid>
		<description>Thanks Bakerboy - care to comment on the Medieval and Roman warming periods, which were both warmer than now?  Did the world face a crisis back then?

And my point was really that 0.18C of warming just doesn&#039;t seem like a crisis or something that is going to fundamentally change our society.  Care to comment on how 0.18C of warming will lead to an apocalypse?

Oh, I know - the computer models say that it&#039;s going to get much, much warmer.  Just that there&#039;s no sign of that happening yet so please rouse me to a panic when it actually does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Bakerboy - care to comment on the Medieval and Roman warming periods, which were both warmer than now?  Did the world face a crisis back then?</p>
<p>And my point was really that 0.18C of warming just doesn&#8217;t seem like a crisis or something that is going to fundamentally change our society.  Care to comment on how 0.18C of warming will lead to an apocalypse?</p>
<p>Oh, I know - the computer models say that it&#8217;s going to get much, much warmer.  Just that there&#8217;s no sign of that happening yet so please rouse me to a panic when it actually does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bullmore's Ghost</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/02/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups-72/#comment-36406</link>
		<dc:creator>Bullmore's Ghost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/02/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups-72/#comment-36406</guid>
		<description>Gavin Moodie writes: Re. “Uh oh. Could Australia be headed for negative growth?” (yesterday, item 2). Would Crikey please stop using that neologistic oxymoron “negative growth” and use instead the perfectly good English word: contraction.

Yes, indeed, the question really should be: Will we have two consecutive periods of positive contraction?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gavin Moodie writes: Re. “Uh oh. Could Australia be headed for negative growth?” (yesterday, item 2). Would Crikey please stop using that neologistic oxymoron “negative growth” and use instead the perfectly good English word: contraction.</p>
<p>Yes, indeed, the question really should be: Will we have two consecutive periods of positive contraction?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bakerboy</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/02/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups-72/#comment-36378</link>
		<dc:creator>bakerboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/02/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups-72/#comment-36378</guid>
		<description>Tamas Calderwood - there it is for you and Andrew Bolt to ponder - Australia has just had the warmest winter on record, irrefutable proof that the planet is warming. (just as sensible as the climate change deniers)  Alex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tamas Calderwood - there it is for you and Andrew Bolt to ponder - Australia has just had the warmest winter on record, irrefutable proof that the planet is warming. (just as sensible as the climate change deniers)  Alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 530/540 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 16:14:45 -->
