A NYT editorial has slammed Goldman Sachs for its role in the financial crisis, Ten must work out what to do with Australian Idol in 2010, how the media downturn will affect higher education, newsreaders get emo, and more.
Murdoch talks journalism but lacks credibility
|
James Murdoch, the eponymous empire’s heir apparent, gave the annual James MacTaggart lecture at the Edinburgh Television Festival late last week. Just like his father did 20 years before. James was “chilled” by the expansion of public broadcasting in the UK:
But one day we will all pay:
It’s the market, stupid:
Which is all very well. His views, however, have a major credibility problem — they are the views of a Murdoch. How can the Murdochs talk about preserving quality journalism given their own so often dubious, self serving sensationalist, damaging, socially corrosive, biased, power crazed, doctrinaire contributions to quality journalism? How can they talk about profits being everything when they run The Times at a huge loss and The Australian at dubious profit in order to maintain their political influence? If these arguments came from any credible quarter they could and should be debated seriously. Coming from the son of the Sun King they are part of a consistent pattern of rhetoric aimed only at entrenching one family’s global power and making more and more money from downmarket journalistic trash and entertainment — which is precisely the reason for the existence of importance of organisations like the BBC (and, in Australia, the ABC) — to offer the public an alternative to the pap the Murdoch family so lucratively dominate. |
|
|
|






