The Greens oppose the CPRS not because it is too weak, but because it will point Australia in the wrong direction with little prospect of turning it around in the timeframe within which emissions must peak, says Senator Christine Milne.
UN envoy: NT intervention racist
|
Statement of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms of indigenous people, James Anaya, as he concludes his visit to Australia. The Government of Australia is to be commended for taking significant steps to improve the human rights and socio-economic conditions of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples of Australia, as well as for its recent expression of support for United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and for its apology to the victims of the Stolen Generation. After several days in Australia listening and learning, however, I have observed a need to develop new initiatives and reform existing ones—in consultation and in real partnership with indigenous peoples—to conform with international standards requiring genuine respect for cultural integrity and self-determination. Over the past 11 days, I have met with Government authorities, representatives of indigenous communities and organisations, and others, in Canberra, South Australia, Western Australia, the Northern Territory, Queensland and New South Wales. I have visited a number of indigenous communities in both remote and urban areas, and have collected information from several sources. I would like to express my appreciation for the support of the Government and to the indigenous individuals and organisations that provided indispensible support in planning and coordinating the visit. I would also like to express my appreciation to the United Nations Information Centre. While I must now take some time to review and analyse the substantial amount of information I have received, and to follow up with further exchanges of information with the Government, indigenous peoples of Australia, and other sources, I would like to provide here a few preliminary observations. During my time in Australia, I have been impressed with demonstrations of strong and vibrant indigenous cultures and have been inspired by the strength, resilience and vision of indigenous communities determined to move toward a better future despite having endured tremendous suffering at the hands of historical forces and entrenched racism. It is clear that these historical forces continue to make their presence known today, manifesting themselves in serious disparities between indigenous and non-indigenous parts of society, including in terms of life expectancy, basic health, education, unemployment, incarceration, children placed under care and protection orders, and access to basic services. Given these disparities, the Government has developed and implemented a number of important initiatives in order to “close the gap” of indigenous disadvantage within a wide range of social and economic areas, with a stated emphasis on women and children, and these programmes must continue to be improved and strengthened. I would also like to stress that I have learned of numerous programmes in place by indigenous authorities and organisations at the local, regional and national levels that have been working effectively to address the many problems that their communities face. Aspects of the Government’s initiatives to remedy situations of indigenous disadvantage, however, raise concerns. Of particular concern is the Northern Territory Emergency Response, which by the Government’s own account is an extraordinary measure, especially in its income management regime, imposition of compulsory leases, and community-wide bans on alcohol consumption and pornography. These measures overtly discriminate against aboriginal peoples, infringe their right of self-determination and stigmatize already stigmatized communities. I would like to stress that affirmative measures by the Government to address the extreme disadvantage faced by indigenous peoples and issues of safety for children and women are not only justified, but they are in fact required under Australia’s international human rights obligations. However, any such measure must be devised and carried out with due regard of the rights of indigenous peoples to self-determination and to be free from racial discrimination and indignity. In this connection, any special measure that infringes on the basic rights of indigenous peoples must be narrowly tailored, proportional, and necessary to achieve the legitimate objectives being pursued. In my view, the Northern Territory Emergency Response is not. In my opinion, as currently configured and carried out, the Emergency Response is incompatible with Australia’s obligations under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, treaties to which Australia is a party, as well as incompatible with the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, to which Australia has affirmed its support. I note with satisfaction that a process to reform the Emergency Response is currently underway and that the Government has initiated consultations with indigenous groups in the Northern Territory in this connection. I hope that amendments to the Emergency Response will diminish or remove its discriminatory aspects and adequately take into account the rights of aboriginal peoples to self determination and culture integrity, in order to bring this Government initiative in line with Australia’s international obligations. Furthermore, I urge the Government to act swiftly to reinstate the protections of the Racial Discrimination Act in regard to the indigenous peoples of the Northern Territory. Beyond the matter of the Northern Territory Emergency Response, I am concerned that there is a need to incorporate into government programmes a more holistic approach to addressing indigenous disadvantage across the country, one that is compatible with the objective of the United Nations Declaration of securing for indigenous peoples, not just social and economic wellbeing, but also the integrity of indigenous communities and cultures, and their self-determination. This approach must involve a real partnership between the Government and the indigenous peoples of Australia, to move towards a future, as described by Prime Minister Rudd in his apology to indigenous peoples last year, that is “based on mutual respect, mutual resolve and mutual responsibility,” and that is also fully respectful of the rights of Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander peoples to maintain their distinct cultural identities, languages, and connections with traditional lands, and to be in control of their own destinies under conditions of equality. Given what I have learned thus far, it would seem to me that the objectives of the closing the gap campaign, the Emergency Response, and other current initiatives and proposed efforts of the Government will be best achieved in partnership with indigenous peoples’ own institutions and decision-making bodies, which are those that are most familiar with the local situations. It is worth stressing that during my visit, I have observed numerous successful indigenous programmes already in place to address issues of alcoholism, domestic violence, health, education, and other areas of concern, in ways that are culturally appropriate and adapted to local needs, and these efforts need to be included in and supported by the Government response, both logistically and financially. In particular, it is essential to provide continued funding to programmes that have already demonstrated achievements. I did observe a number of Government partnerships with local initiatives that appear to be succeeding, but I also heard many accounts of situations in which Government programmes fail to take into account existing local programmes already in place, hampering their ultimate success. In this connection, I am concerned about any initiatives that duplicate or replace the programmes of Aboriginals and Torres Straight Islanders already in place, or that undermine local decision-making through indigenous peoples’ own institutions. In addition, international human rights norms, including those contained in the United Nations Declaration, affirmatively guarantee the right of indigenous peoples to participate fully at all levels of decision-making in matters which may affect their rights, lives and destinies, as well as to maintain and develop their own decision-making institutions and programmes. Further, adequate options and alternatives for socio-economic development and violence prevention programmes should be developed in full consultation with affected indigenous communities and organisations. It is also necessary to ensure the meaningful, direct participation of Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander peoples in the design of programmes and policies at the national level, within a forum that is genuinely representative of the rights and interests of indigenous peoples. In this regard, I welcome the initiative that is supported by the Government to move towards development of a model for a new national indigenous representative body and emphasise that indigenous participation in the development of this body is fundamental. At the same time, I would like to echo the statements I have heard from indigenous leaders of the need for indigenous peoples themselves to continue to strengthen their own organisational and local governance capacity, in order to meet the challenges faced by their communities, and in this connection I note the importance of restoring or building strong and healthy relationships within families and communities. I would also note a need to move deliberately to adopt genuine reconciliation measures, such as the proposed recognition of the rights of Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander peoples in a charter of rights to be included in the Constitution. I am pleased that the Government has expressed its willingness in this regard, and I urge it to provide a high priority to this initiative. As has been stressed to me by the indigenous representatives with whom I have met, constitutional recognition and protection of the rights of Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander peoples would provide a measure of long-term security for these rights, and provide an important building block for reconciliation and a future of harmonious relations between indigenous and non-indigenous parts of Australian society. Furthermore, it is important to note that securing the rights of indigenous peoples to their lands is of central importance to indigenous peoples’ socio-economic development, self-determination, and cultural integrity. Continued efforts to resolve, clarify, and strengthen the protection of indigenous lands and resources should be made. In this regard, government initiatives to address the housing needs of indigenous peoples, should avoid imposing leasing or other arrangements that would undermine indigenous peoples’ control over their lands. I also urge the Government to comply with the recommendations concerning indigenous lands and resources made by the treaty-monitoring bodies of the United Nations, including the recommendation of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination to advance in discussions with Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islanders about possible amendments to the Native Title Act and finding solutions acceptable to all. Finally, I would like to reiterate the importance of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples for framing and evaluating legislation, policies, and actions that affect the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders Peoples. The Declaration expresses the global consensus on the rights of indigenous peoples and corresponding state obligations on the basis of universal human rights. I recommend that the Government undertake a comprehensive review of all its legislation, policies, and programmes that affect Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders in light of the Declaration. Click here to view the original. |
|
|
|







11 Comments
As a passive supporter of despotic and dictatorial regimes and wholesale genocide worldwide, the UN has ZERO credibility on ANY issue, least of all being fit to pass judgement on what is the only reasonable solution to a desperate situation that up until now has been dominated by black-armband idealogues and poverty-sustaining academics who ascribe to the continued folly of “self-determination”.
Any intervention will take generations to have a material affect on the blights now facing Aborignial society.
They won’t be fixed by next Thursday week as is the demand of mouth-for-hire career public officials like James Anaya.
A negative UN human rights report on any western nation should basically be viewed as a badge of honour within that country.
It certainly is by all clear thinkers the world over.
This represents an indictment of the UN not that any more are necessary.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/26/opinion/26sun2.html?_r=2&n=Top%2fOpinion%2fEditorials%20and%20Op-Ed%2fEditorials&oref=slogin
lol at the two posters above, awsome posts guys.
UN=massive fail boat
No point in trying to blame the messenger here
Whichever way you look at it the “intervention”
is “Special Treatment” a separate line at the
supermarket and an army doctor looking up your kids arse.
Well, rather predictable response Jamesk and MIA
MPM - Zero credibility still earns a lot financial support for the UN from the worlds richest nations- even if they are a bit late with the payments.
Look, this is a complicated issue, and I think there is something positive about getting a nudge from someone from the UN, so the Gov to stops wringing its hands and winds back some of the most repugnant measures of the ‘emergency response’. Let’s not get all haughty about it. We know about failure of UN to be hard on those that don’t do as they say, but that is no reason to re-assemble a motley cheer squad for Bolton and the Dubberya Bush regime.
J-boy like myself believes the push back to this shouldn’t be focussed on the UN. I think it should be more on the government’s need to get serious about some community focused and community engaged programs that are not cookie cutter solutions for the original Australians; rather, programs that take into account the many separate motivations of tribal indigenous peoples, giving back their respect by engaging in their world view and taking on their criticisms of past failings, allowing dignity to prevail for all of us under a secure contract of equality of rights and sanctity of original possession - where demonstrated.
I reckon this would prevent more of these guilt ridden knee jerk reactions like the “emergency response” where the dire needs of indigenous people are suddenly recognised, but just for a political moment, only to be forgotten again.
So … the alternative to the UN is … ?
(A US health care system perhaps, and a very, very, selective system of sanctions against proven human rights violations)
” As has been stressed to me by the >>indigenous representatives<>indigenous leaders<< of the need for indigenous peoples themselves to continue to strengthen their own organisational and local governance capacity “
indigenous leaders ?!?! Self, Media and Gubberment appointed !!!! Leaders of Nobody !!!!
This bloke has been has obviously been Influenced and Misled by the articulate and tricky Les Melzer, well before he arrived here. Les has been traveling overseas for a while now misrepresenting himself as some sort of spokesperson or representitive of the Aboriginal and Islander people of Australia. Les has stated that he, Has A Mandate. This is “ABSOLUTE CRAP.” He has been encouraged by the Aboriginal Victim Industry ( A.V.I. ) including ANTaR ( qld ) and associates.
What were his views on the U.Ns poverty levels ? ie. one dollar ($1) a day, as everyone get’s a minum thirty dollars ( $30 ) a day here on the dole. With Fifty Eight (58) venues for free and nourishing food including BBQs and hot meals in the inner city Brisbane alone!
>>”As has been stressed to me by the indigenous representatives with whom I have met “<>”At the same time, I would like to echo the statements I have heard from indigenous leaders of the need for indigenous peoples themselves to continue to strengthen their own organisational and local governance capacity “<< Indigenous leaders? Self and Media appointed and leaders of Nobody.
This bloke has been has obviously been Influenced and Misled by the articulate and tricky Les Melzer, well before he arrived here. Les has been traveling overseas for a while now to the United Nations. Presenting and Misrepresenting himself as some sort of spokesperson or representitive of the Aboriginal and Islander people of Australia. Les has stated that he has A Mandate. This is not true and Les knows it. He has been encouraged by the Aboriginal Victim Industry ( A.V.I. ) including ANTaR ( qld ) and associates. He has gotten a lot of milage from his association with the defunded F.A.I.R.A.
What views re. the U.Ns poverty levels ? ie. one dollar ($1) a day, as everyone get’s a minum thirty dollars ( $30 ) a day here on the dole. With Fifty Eight (58) venues for free and nourishing food including BBQs and hot meals in the inner city Brisbane alone!
…..for more info on these and issues…. aboriginalvictimindustry.bigblog.com.au
So Arthur - You don’t like the UN, you clearly don’t like Aboriginal people. You claim in one breath to listen to Aboriginal leaders, then in the next slam any sign of indigenous leadership. You spew venom and hate, ignorance and arrogance in every post I have read of yours. And your making a sport of spreading misinformation, seemingly stalking the blogs on this subject and generally muddying up whatever water you wade into.
I do feel sad for you. There must be little joy in your life. I will thank you though, because your giving me the opportunity to dispel so many of the tired old arguments. I’m putting you and your kind on notice here. Racism has a limited time left in Australia, and if people like yourself are so threatened by Aboriginal people having control of their lives and land, then you must be hiding something pretty nasty.
What is your agenda Arthur? Because you come very close to inciting hatred, and there is a law against that in Australia, for very good reason. So why don’t you come clean and declare your true interests?
PS: Maybe you should lay off the statistics - at least until you can learn to use them properly.
Racism or Prejudice?
We are continually accused of being a racist society. But is it racism? Or plain old Aussie prejudice! For instance, Chinese restaurants dishing up stray cats as rabbit or chicken! This old tale kept me off Chinese food for years! Aussie ex-P.O.Ws from ww 2 refusing to buy Japanese cars because of their treatment. Is this racism? If so, what is color prejudice? If you’re white you’re right, if you’re brown hang around, if you’re black get back. This is a determining factor in Aboriginal society as well. Is this racism? And if you’re Islander (Mud) get back even further! The division between Full-Blood and caste Aboriginal People is legend. An issue not discussed in the public domain. Almost like a taboo subject ! But a fact of life. You won’t hear Macia Langton or Michael Mansell talk about this. A Full-Blood will accept and trust a white person before they would a yella fella or mixed blood Aboriginal they know will exploit them. Is this racism? Torres Strait Islanders are derided by us. Is this racism? This is one reason why they are seeking to annul the marriage “Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders”. On the grounds of non consummation. It was a marriage in name only. Regarding and involving easier and continued access to funding. A marriage of convenience so to speak. ( alb c.9/07 )
BRISBANE BLACKS, CLEAN UP YOUR OWN BACK YARD!
” Unfinished Business in Brisbane ”
A major problem and impediment to progress is the Black Bureaucracy. That layer of people between us and the Government (read money) the middleman (or woman) Mainly Administration and Management of Aboriginal and Islander and associated organizations. i.e. Legal Services, Health Services, Hostels, Youth Services, Education etc, their Supporters in the Public Services, including the mainly Black, One-Eyed Academics.This is why people like Michael Long and others feel the need to Communicate Directly with heads of Government. To Circumnavigate These People. It is the Failure of These People that led directly to the Loss of A.T.S.I.C. There is Absolutely No Doubt! about this. The Accumulation of Blatant Maladministration, Mismanagement and Gross Incompetence in A&I Organisations in Brisbane for instance, led to the Loss of Musgrave Park Aboriginal Corporation (M.P.A.C), a major service provider that was responsible for two A&I hostels in Brisbane. As well as being a day and drop-in center for many A&I and non Indigenous homeless and street people. EVERYONE !!!! in South Brisbane including Non-Indigenous Locals, The Police, the A&I Community, the People that Accept and Accepted the mantle of Community Leaders and Spokespersons and so called Role Models, Was Aware of the Ongoing Maladministration, Mismanagement and Corruption including drug-dealing, Associated With This Organisation, And for years! Yet, NOT ONE !!!! was prepared to say or do anything about it! Many were on the board of M.P.A.C. at various times. A lot of these people are, Still on the Boards of, Running, and Employed in, A&I organisations in Brisbane and Handling 100s of Thousands of Dollars! Everyone Knows Who They Are, and it is No Secret. Inquire of these issues to the so called, Local Leaders and Spokespersons, and they will declare, that they are, Blind and Deaf. This is the reason for the Deafening Silence on the Demise of A.T.S.I.C. Accountability Thrown Out The Door! Yet, With Employment and Funding Secure. It was the same with the dismantling of the Aboriginal Development Corporation (A.D.C.) Much properties and infrastructures, unknown to the general public or discussed, was passed on privately, and to Boards of Organisations. Much was lost! Including monies advanced to staff and management, and unsecured loans. Many people were (a lot still around) Let Off the Hook! And now it looks the same with A.T.S.I.C. Many have been around for to long. The Old Guard a lot of them. Still clinging to their past achievements. A lot done a lot of good. But now it is time for them to Move On. They certainly have No Answers to the Problems in this Country. It is Extremely Doubtful, if they even know what the Problems Are! And some even, Responsible For Them. This is why in the main, A&I people including street -people and the paint sniffers, have No Respect for Them and their, Oppressive, Tunnel-Visioned, One Dimensional, Agendas, and A&I Organisations and Services in general.( alb. c.6/03 )