Comments on: Shock! Tom and Katie in predictable paparazzo bust up http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/24/shock-tom-and-katie-in-predictable-paparazzo-bust-up/ now with extra source Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:14:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Sean http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/24/shock-tom-and-katie-in-predictable-paparazzo-bust-up/#comment-35977 Sean Sun, 30 Aug 2009 03:41:25 +0000 http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/24/shock-tom-and-katie-in-predictable-paparazzo-bust-up/#comment-35977 Should be 'lies in wait' in the last para, not 'lies in wake'. Little eggcorn there, thought I'd mention it. Keep up the nauseating ALP branch stacking stories, they really cheer me up. You might also look at ALP policy one day and ask why, for instance, Tanya Plibersek/Wayne Swan/the collective Cabinet hand out a lot of taxpayers money on FHOBs only to see first home buyers ruined within a year with crippling housing repayments, and run an NRAS which gives $8K to landlords to provide $3K of benefit to tenants. The real winners are developers and vendors. That's all. Should be ‘lies in wait’ in the last para, not ‘lies in wake’. Little eggcorn there, thought I’d mention it.

Keep up the nauseating ALP branch stacking stories, they really cheer me up. You might also look at ALP policy one day and ask why, for instance, Tanya Plibersek/Wayne Swan/the collective Cabinet hand out a lot of taxpayers money on FHOBs only to see first home buyers ruined within a year with crippling housing repayments, and run an NRAS which gives $8K to landlords to provide $3K of benefit to tenants. The real winners are developers and vendors.

That’s all.

]]> By: banistersmind http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/24/shock-tom-and-katie-in-predictable-paparazzo-bust-up/#comment-35371 banistersmind Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:39:33 +0000 http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/24/shock-tom-and-katie-in-predictable-paparazzo-bust-up/#comment-35371 I routinely like to claw my eyes out when ever I see a celebrity. Then I think of the theorem I created called the Deep Impact theorem. This holds that - should a ELE (Extinction Level Event) ever happen upon the Earth and we are forced to build an underground "Ark" such as what happened in th film "Deep Impact" then society would prioritize candidates to go into the Ark by potential contribution to a society that survives the event. In this event I can be reasonably sure that the majority of celebs including these vacuous twats would be left to fend for themselves because, really, they provide no useful function to the community at large... I routinely like to claw my eyes out when ever I see a celebrity. Then I think of the theorem I created called the Deep Impact theorem. This holds that - should a ELE (Extinction Level Event) ever happen upon the Earth and we are forced to build an underground “Ark” such as what happened in th film “Deep Impact” then society would prioritize candidates to go into the Ark by potential contribution to a society that survives the event. In this event I can be reasonably sure that the majority of celebs including these vacuous twats would be left to fend for themselves because, really, they provide no useful function to the community at large…

]]> By: AR http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/24/shock-tom-and-katie-in-predictable-paparazzo-bust-up/#comment-35347 AR Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:42:04 +0000 http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/24/shock-tom-and-katie-in-predictable-paparazzo-bust-up/#comment-35347 Any more of this dross and you can kiss my subscription goodbye. Any more of this dross and you can kiss my subscription goodbye.

]]> By: meski http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/24/shock-tom-and-katie-in-predictable-paparazzo-bust-up/#comment-35306 meski Mon, 24 Aug 2009 06:57:21 +0000 http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/24/shock-tom-and-katie-in-predictable-paparazzo-bust-up/#comment-35306 Agreed, Paddy. Crikey, if you've got to have these stories, can't you put them in the metaphorical brown wrapper? (In other words, just link to them off your home page, don't post them in the email) Agreed, Paddy. Crikey, if you’ve got to have these stories, can’t you put them in the metaphorical brown wrapper? (In other words, just link to them off your home page, don’t post them in the email)

]]> By: David Crookes http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/24/shock-tom-and-katie-in-predictable-paparazzo-bust-up/#comment-35305 David Crookes Mon, 24 Aug 2009 06:54:08 +0000 http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/24/shock-tom-and-katie-in-predictable-paparazzo-bust-up/#comment-35305 I was just about to renew my subscription when I came across this highly edifying and wonderfully illuminating piece of journalism. . I was just about to renew my subscription when I came across this highly edifying and wonderfully illuminating piece of journalism. .

]]> By: paddy http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/24/shock-tom-and-katie-in-predictable-paparazzo-bust-up/#comment-35278 paddy Mon, 24 Aug 2009 05:48:50 +0000 http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/24/shock-tom-and-katie-in-predictable-paparazzo-bust-up/#comment-35278 Oh FFS Crikey!! *Please* tell me that this dross isn't the future of the all new, singing and dancing, Crikey for busy chicks. :-( What an appalling waste of electrons. (And everybody's time.) Bring on the women writers and p*iss this rubbish off to the tabloids where it belongs. I seem to recall, not so long ago, Crikey lecturing Fairfax, about trashing its brand online and hiding its "serious" stories behind an avalanche of tabloid tack. Pot....meet kettle. Oh FFS Crikey!!
*Please* tell me that this dross isn’t the future of the all new, singing and dancing, Crikey for busy chicks. :-(

What an appalling waste of electrons. (And everybody’s time.)
Bring on the women writers and p*iss this rubbish off to the tabloids where it belongs.

I seem to recall, not so long ago, Crikey lecturing Fairfax, about trashing its brand online
and hiding its “serious” stories behind an avalanche of tabloid tack.
Pot….meet kettle.

]]>