<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How do CPRS schemes work?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/12/crikey-clarifier-cprs-schemes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/12/crikey-clarifier-cprs-schemes/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:59:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Aveling</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/12/crikey-clarifier-cprs-schemes/#comment-34191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Aveling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/12/crikey-clarifier-cprs-schemes/#comment-34191</guid>
		<description>I would rather see no subsidy, but if we must, let&#039;s have one tied to the positive externalities, not the negative externalities.  If you can produce more power per unit of carbon than the average then you can sell the extra credits for a profit; vice-versa if you can&#039;t.

As is, the subsidy will be biggest for the biggest polluters, and smallest for the most efficient - exactly backwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would rather see no subsidy, but if we must, let&#8217;s have one tied to the positive externalities, not the negative externalities.  If you can produce more power per unit of carbon than the average then you can sell the extra credits for a profit; vice-versa if you can&#8217;t.</p>
<p>As is, the subsidy will be biggest for the biggest polluters, and smallest for the most efficient - exactly backwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jillian Blackall</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/12/crikey-clarifier-cprs-schemes/#comment-34180</link>
		<dc:creator>Jillian Blackall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/12/crikey-clarifier-cprs-schemes/#comment-34180</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t read this yet but have printed it out to read on the train. It looks very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read this yet but have printed it out to read on the train. It looks very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Bower</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/12/crikey-clarifier-cprs-schemes/#comment-34163</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Bower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/12/crikey-clarifier-cprs-schemes/#comment-34163</guid>
		<description>Gawd, if this is a clarifier from an economist, no wonder we are in deep trouble! In my view the more complex you make it the more easily it can be rorted, especially if you leave it to the market to sort things out for you. Heaven help us is all I can say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gawd, if this is a clarifier from an economist, no wonder we are in deep trouble! In my view the more complex you make it the more easily it can be rorted, especially if you leave it to the market to sort things out for you. Heaven help us is all I can say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 498/508 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 13:08:55 -->
