Obama fails as GOP mobs astroturf health reform

Angry mobs invading public meetings, shouting down speakers, assaulting attendees, using circulated instructions on tactical disruption (“spread yourself around the hall … don’t engage in debate … make sure the speaker can’t be heard”). Some sleazy Latin American populist push? No, it’s north of the border, where Republican mobs have turned thuggish and violent in their attempt to break up “town hall” meetings organised to discuss health care reform in the US.

Most of these groups are what US politicians call “astroturf” — i.e. a false grassroots, local Republican operatives, or a literal rent-a-crowd paid by lobby groups, to pretend to be angry concerned citizens. Some of them are that, but it doesn’t matter — the town hall meetings are set up as open forums to debate the health care issue. Shouting them down, or making them unworkable is simply anti-democratic, and genuinely at the outer edges of fascistic.

Your correspondent has never been comfortable with this when it occurs on the left, and the liberal left in America should be unequivocal in denouncing not only the thugs perpetrating this stuff, but those on the right unwilling to condemn it*.

Are they doing it? Nuh-uh. Check out Huffington Post, and other liberal sites, and you’ll see American liberals doing what they love best — analysing things in terms of race, sitting around treating their enemy as a set of symptoms of social malaise, misinformation etc etc, anything to avoid actual contestation and conflict, which is what politics is.

It doesn’t matter that the crowd are mostly astroturf — nor does it matter that a lot of them are simply shrieking with anger because they have a black President, though they are. What matters is whether civil debate is being destroyed by violence and intimidation, and getting on the side of free speech and against the thugs.

The greatest failure here is the President’s. Obama has retreated into the same position he took this time last year, when John McCain was starting to overtake him with relentlessly aggressive and punchy politics. The retrospective construction of this was that it was an example of “no-drama Obama”, moving gracefully towards victory. Bollox it was — it was Obama flummoxed by the populist appeal of McCain to a huge tranche of American voters. The signal moment was Obama’s frustration with the fun McCain made of Obama’s suggestion that properly inflating your tyres would save as much petrol as could be generated by reviving US offshore drilling.

Even the automobile association says that’s true,” Obama told an audience shaking his head, “these people like being stupid.”

Yeah they do — because support for offshore drilling was purely symbolic, a testament to the US idea of dominating the earth, making it serve you. The idea of kneeling down to pump up your tyres was a picture of self-submission, that thing Europeans do with their bicycles. Hell, we’re America — we’ll drive on our goddam rims if we want to!

Obama’s demeanour then reminded me exactly of befuddled academics, faced with year on year budget cuts, suddenly realising that they have to fight for and argue their case for public funding in the public funding. They shake their heads in disbelief at the stupidity of the people they have to kowtow to — can’t they see how much more important our work is? Just let us get on with it!

Obama shows every sign of displaying the same impatience. After a year of campaigning to get the job — including six months of primaries where he had to adopt an oracular personality that was most people’s first introduction to him, but which was quite unlike his baseline personal style — it looks like he can’t believe he has to keep campaigning for his policies. “Just let me get on with it,” he is reported to have told a bunch of Republicans he’d persuaded to assist in the health-care push, as part of his effort at bipartisanship.

That bipartisanship has generated dividends in getting an actual health care bill closer to getting up than anything that’s come before, but the cost has been huge in terms of its basic provisions — no PBS-equivalent to stop Big Pharma setting huge prices, no use of Medicare (the public fund for 65+ Americans) to set baseline insurance charges.

Now, Dick Durbin**, a “liberal” Democrat, has declared himself open to the “non-public” option — i.e. no public health care provider in the mix, available to all Americans who want to use it (on a fee basis), as competition to the private insurance industry. Instead, Durbin is leaning towards the co-ops model — arm’s-length non-profits as a way of getting the 100 million un- or underinsured Americans some decent cover. Maybe it’s a ploy, or maybe the whole thing has all but fallen apart.

Given the supreme difficulties in the way of getting through a vote in both houses, you can see the need to give significant things away. Politically, the important thing is to get twenty or so million Americans insured for the first time in their lives and worry about the cost blowout later. That then leaves the Republicans with the unappetising task of de-insuring people, and gives the Democrats a whole extension of their political base. Part of Obama’s low key approach to date has been a disciplined attempt to keep the thing from becoming a culture war — to allow the Blue Dog Democrats and moderate Republicans wiggle room to support the bill without being seen to be allying with a black man yelling about the “universal right to health care”.

The Democrats would have to be suicidal to allow that to happen — – but deep Blue Dogs like Senator Ben Nelson in Nebraska are effectively Independents. The party knows that if there’s too much pressure on them, they’ll simply switch to the Republicans, taking half the state’s Democrat votes with them. The possibility of some grand and catastrophic double-cross cannot be ruled out.

That would blow a deep hole in the Obama presidency — worse in a way than the Clintons’ failure on healthcare, which was a clearer push by the executive of a take it or leave it option to the legislature (they left it). It would be all the more bitter to swallow given that — as Howard Dean has pointed out — the whole bill could be put through as part of the “reconciliation” (i.e. budget) process, where only a simple majority in the Senate is required, a vote the Democrat core has handily. But that would have buried the process as half a dozen separate initiatives, without any core legislative achievement to point to. Obama wants a health-care bill he can claim as his own.

And that’s where the NUBO rule comes in.*** The seas are rough at the moment, but the passage of a health care bill, and the gradual realisation that it was making a difference to people’s lives and bottom-lines would be a powerful accumulator moving towards 2012. In that sense Obama is holding steady to a political task that Carter never got to, and Clinton abandoned after one go.

But God man, lead from the front. Be out there every morning at a press conference, denouncing the town hall disruptors as “un-Americans” whom every believer in democracy and debate should be ashamed of. When Sarah Palin says that Obama’s plan would have killed her down syndrome baby, denounce her as a disgusting user of her child’s condition to spread lies.

Maybe then, with some political leadership, supine American left-liberals would stop blogging and making DVD-release documentaries about each other long enough to go to toe-to-toe with the thugs. Jesus, these people. They’re either operators invested in the permanent liberal political establishment, or fey college grads on Zoloft and food-exclusion diets twittering about Darfur and crowdsourcing, or bitter old new leftists a la Counterpunch, so jaundiced about Obama that they won’t even turn out when the basic conditions of civil life are being threatened. Even reliably forthright unions like the SEIU haven’t been stumping up a force to basically defend people’s right to speak.

Fwere me, I’d turn up to a town hall with twenty burly guys and gals in matching “town hall defender” t-shirts***, pick off and physically throw out anyone who was obviously trying to make a meeting unworkable. You’d only need to do it in one place, and it would go viral from news reports, and the Zoloft-and-soy crowd tweetdecking it from Wi-Fi juice bars.

The Democratic Party will not get in a street-fight to win the Presidency,” Warren Christopher, epitome of the liberal establishment, said at the time of the 2000 Florida recount. They didn’t and they didn’t. Unlike the tango, it doesn’t take two to start a street-fight. If the other guy decides that’s what it is, then that’s what it is, and you better get in it to win it. Labour groups and the left should be able to win these things with less violence — indeed by restoring order — because we’re better organised and more disciplined than the right-wing crazies. But only if we turn up. Even the impressively organised “Alliance For America” is so kum-bay-yah they can’t seem to conceive of a process that doesn’t involve people “telling their stories” over cups of rescue remedy tea.

Mind you, it’s quite possible that more is happening on the ground in the US than can be told from the reports. But when you look at these grinning thugs, the proverbial worst, full of passionate intensity, waving swastikas and lynched effigies, as town-hall attendees stand around gormless, you have to wonder once again what happened to the American liberal-left, what complex of social transformation, identity politics, residual puritan influence, absence of a political wing of the labour movement, and much more, turned them into such diffident pussies. Subject for a dissertation — which no doubt hundreds are writing, instead of organising a pushback against the thugs.

Could be totally missing the pushback. Fair warning. Could be totally. Don’t think I am, but I could be. So we’ll see.

May I say in closing, nyarrggghhhhhh. Gak. Mugurk. And add. Nyarrrgghhh.

*Civil disobedience and insurrection towards corporate, military or state power is quite a different matter.

**Not a slang term for a condom — “mate if you don’t put your dick turban on, you’ll get santorum all over yourself”. Or santosantoro, as the substance is called in Australia. (santorum? Wikipedia it).

***Never Underestimate Barack Obama. Keep up or you’ll never pass the exam.

****Not the pathetic “Bill and Ben” t-shirts the union movement got dolled up in so that Julia Gillard could tear them a new arsehole while they sat there and took it like the teary little porcelain kittens they are at the moment.


15 Comments

  1. Matt C
    Posted Monday, 10 August 2009 at 1:34 pm | Permalink

    Rundle is worth the price of subscribing to Crikey. Good stuff.

  2. paddy
    Posted Monday, 10 August 2009 at 1:50 pm | Permalink

    Fire in the belly? Light on the hill?
    Nah, it’s Rundle in full flight, *NOT* going quietly into the night. :-)

  3. malcolm grant
    Posted Monday, 10 August 2009 at 1:51 pm | Permalink

    Hey if you are giong to reference Santorum then you can pay credence to Dan Savage who invented the definition.

  4. Susan Timmins
    Posted Monday, 10 August 2009 at 2:04 pm | Permalink

    Go Guy go…great stuff. So hard to understand from this end why the anger many feel isn’t harnessed in reply.

  5. James Barron
    Posted Monday, 10 August 2009 at 2:26 pm | Permalink

    Sooooo..let me get this straight..the lily-livered Lefties are useless (but decent, loving, civic-minded citizens) and the crazy Conservatives are violent vandals and thugs and a threat to everything we hold dear (and should be opposed with every resource available)…so what’s the problem here? BHO was after all a community-organiser himself..surely he knows what to do? If not, Nancy, Harry, Dick & Barbara are on it..what could possibly go wrong?

  6. Michael James
    Posted Monday, 10 August 2009 at 3:01 pm | Permalink

    Guy is feeling that awful gut-wrenching, sinking feeling just like what happened in the middle of the campaign. When every observer screeched about Obama and his team being on valium instead of vigorously attacking McCain.
    Almost every week there is panic that Obama is not doing enough, is not activist enough (or of course doing way too much by way of spending). Yet, he is POTUS. The US economy has averted meltdown and is slowly coming back to life. The car industry averted total implosion. And the health debate makes painful progress. Perhaps like the tea-parties, the townhall organized rage may simply flame out, and be more likely to without adding fuel to the fire. Dunno.
    As an original sceptic (during the campaign, and I so wanted Hillary to win) I am willing to NUBO. But the frustration is exacerbated by not knowing the answer to the question: would he still be president if the GFC didn’t happen when it did (almost perfect timing), and/or if McCain had not nominated Sarah Palin?

  7. Guy Rundle
    Posted Monday, 10 August 2009 at 3:38 pm | Permalink

    Malcolm - Dan Savage has explicitly said he doesn’t want the term credited to him each time - he wants it to become a part of the English language (like boycott, after Mr Boycott) in general use.

  8. malcolm grant
    Posted Monday, 10 August 2009 at 3:48 pm | Permalink

    Fair call Guy.

    I am pleased to see that you are using it in its correct context.

    I seriously believe that ther Seattle Stranger has one of the best blogging models out there and I would love to see Crikey adopt the structure and technology.

    Viva la Slog.

  9. Jack
    Posted Monday, 10 August 2009 at 4:37 pm | Permalink

    When Sarah Palin says that Obama’s plan would have killed her Down Syndrome baby, denounce her as a disgusting user of her baby’s condition to spread lies”….Is that what Palin actually said Guy????? It would KILL here Baby? let’s go to the tape….

    The Democrats promise that a government health care system will reduce the cost of health care, but as the economist Thomas Sowell has pointed out, government health care will not reduce the cost; it will simply refuse to pay the cost. And who will suffer the most when they ration care? The sick, the elderly, and the disabled, of course. The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s “death panel” so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgement of their “level of productivity in society”, whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil.”

  10. Down and Out of Sài Gòn
    Posted Monday, 10 August 2009 at 5:50 pm | Permalink

    The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s “death panel” so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgement of their “level of productivity in society”, whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil.”

    No, Jack. The America you know and love is one in which your parents or (hypothetically) your baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of private insurance companies’ “death panels” so that their bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgement of their “level of productivity in society”, whether they are worthy of health care.

    And yes, such a system is downright evil.

  11. Kevin Herbert
    Posted Monday, 10 August 2009 at 6:24 pm | Permalink

    Obama is taking on the AMA, the Jewish lobby & the arms industry concurrently…..I don’t like it, but he either knows something the rest of we mortals don’t know, or he’s dead meat after one term.

    Who’s the next President going to be?

    Anyone???

  12. AR
    Posted Monday, 10 August 2009 at 6:54 pm | Permalink

    KevinH - if it’s Jedd Shrub, stop the world I’ll want to get off.

  13. jose carreras
    Posted Tuesday, 11 August 2009 at 5:51 am | Permalink

    Guy the thing that has always impressed me most about political parties but in particular those on the hard right is their ability to get ordinary people of modest means to vote for policies that areagainst their own self interest.

    For instance in light of your article on US Health insurance I thought you’d appreciate this:
    Uninsured conservative activist hurt at health rally
    http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_08/019423.php

  14. wyane
    Posted Tuesday, 11 August 2009 at 3:16 pm | Permalink

    I second Matt C’s comment … and, and, and 1800 words from GR and no bloody “Click here to read the rest of this article”!! Yay!

    Web 101 says that you never create a link that says “Click here”.
    Pay-wall 101 says that, unlike paper, the screen doesn’t need ink and trees to carry the , ahem , content. Keep running the whole darned nine column-yards in the daily emails , please (at least from your best contributors, correspondents and writers, Crikey).
    Cheers!

  15. Mr Denmore
    Posted Thursday, 13 August 2009 at 5:01 pm | Permalink

    It’s not just the thuggish redneck right white-anting Obama on healthcare. The usual suspects in the economics profession are doing it as well, including Chicago School acolyte and fund manager Cliff Asness - which suggests the whole thing is being orchestrated:

    http://www.stumblingontruth.com/