<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The University of Melbourne gags VCA staff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/07/the-university-of-melbourne-gags-vca-staff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/07/the-university-of-melbourne-gags-vca-staff/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:48:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Moodie</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/07/the-university-of-melbourne-gags-vca-staff/#comment-33752</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Moodie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 03:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/07/the-university-of-melbourne-gags-vca-staff/#comment-33752</guid>
		<description>This article conflates the Victorian College of Arts&#039; inability to operate within its revenue which led to its full merger - takeover, really - by the University of Melbourne and the curriculum changes introduced by the &#039;Melbourne model&#039;.

The University of Melbourne&#039;s earlier merger with (again, takeover of) the former Melbourne College of Advanced Education was reasonably successful, as was the University of Wollongong&#039;s takeover of the Wollongong Institute of Education, James Cook University&#039;s takeover of the Townsville College of Advanced Education, the University of Tasmania&#039;s takeover of the Tasmanian State Institute of Technology, the University of Queensland&#039;s takeover of the Queensland Agricultural College . . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article conflates the Victorian College of Arts&#8217; inability to operate within its revenue which led to its full merger - takeover, really - by the University of Melbourne and the curriculum changes introduced by the &#8216;Melbourne model&#8217;.</p>
<p>The University of Melbourne&#8217;s earlier merger with (again, takeover of) the former Melbourne College of Advanced Education was reasonably successful, as was the University of Wollongong&#8217;s takeover of the Wollongong Institute of Education, James Cook University&#8217;s takeover of the Townsville College of Advanced Education, the University of Tasmania&#8217;s takeover of the Tasmanian State Institute of Technology, the University of Queensland&#8217;s takeover of the Queensland Agricultural College &#8230; .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rena Zurawel</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/07/the-university-of-melbourne-gags-vca-staff/#comment-33730</link>
		<dc:creator>Rena Zurawel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 08:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/07/the-university-of-melbourne-gags-vca-staff/#comment-33730</guid>
		<description>I have never heard about a &#039;successful merger&#039;  in Australia, as yet. .  Anyway, it does not really matter since the Australian universities, albeit very expensive,  are not world famous for their performance.   
They also lack the tradition and a traditional concept of the &#039;universitas&#039;. (common and fee-free). 
Thus, it does affect the contents of the curriculum and traditionally &#039;independent&#039; status of a university. And, as long as our tertiary education  existence is dependent upon money from i.e. overseas students - as far as I am concerned- our university education is mainly a commercial establishment, never mind the academic contents and discipline.
Or: Lucri bonus est odor ex re qualibet ? (Juvenal xiv.204) - the smell of the money is good whenever it comes from.

Is it the smell of the money we are talking about discussing academic standards and freedom of our universities?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never heard about a &#8216;successful merger&#8217;  in Australia, as yet. .  Anyway, it does not really matter since the Australian universities, albeit very expensive,  are not world famous for their performance.<br />
They also lack the tradition and a traditional concept of the &#8216;universitas&#8217;. (common and fee-free).<br />
Thus, it does affect the contents of the curriculum and traditionally &#8216;independent&#8217; status of a university. And, as long as our tertiary education  existence is dependent upon money from i.e. overseas students - as far as I am concerned- our university education is mainly a commercial establishment, never mind the academic contents and discipline.<br />
Or: Lucri bonus est odor ex re qualibet ? (Juvenal xiv.204) - the smell of the money is good whenever it comes from.</p>
<p>Is it the smell of the money we are talking about discussing academic standards and freedom of our universities?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 465/475 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 16:43:53 -->
