The Greens oppose the CPRS not because it is too weak, but because it will point Australia in the wrong direction with little prospect of turning it around in the timeframe within which emissions must peak, says Senator Christine Milne.
Ethics aside, a big day for The Oz
|
The Australian draped two absolutely cracking stories above the fold on its front page today: “EXCLUSIVE: Army base terror plot foiled” and “Grech: Why I faxed email EXCLUSIVE”. Two big stories that again affirmed, in their own intriguing ways, that The Australian is both what it thinks it is — the newspaper that sets the country’s agenda — and what it really is — the newspaper that pushes the boundaries so hard that they sometimes crack under the weight of its own corporate culture. Both stories were scoops. Both stories were important. Surely those two facts alone should have been enough to validate The Australian’s belief in its innate role, as it proclaims every day under its masthead, as “The Heart of The Nation”? Maybe, but as with so much about The Australian there is an unpublished dimension to both stories which, without discrediting their content, raises so many annoyingly ethical questions about whether either story should have been published at all.
To people who write about it, the most irritating aspect of ethics in journalism is when it moves from being the subject of a thumping editorial to becoming a subject that affects annoyingly real people like terrorism police and psychiatric patients. |
|
|
|














3 Comments
I am dreadfully sorry Crikey, you do a lot of good work, but slamming a paper like the Australian over their ethics is the quintessential case of the pot calling the kettle black.
I’m sure there was a lot of back slapping at The Oz this morning, and nominations for Walkleys already being composed. And a lot of beers being passed over the bar at the Aurora tonight.
How credible is the substance of an interview given by an imate of a psychiatric hospital? What could be the affect of giving such an interview on the state of mind of Godwin Grech? Did The Oz consider it might further adversely affect his health? Clearly not.
And, how stupid is it to run a story on a terrorist raid before the raid? Was there any consideration that this might put lives and crucial evidence at risk? Again, clearly not. The Oz, had the story before anyone else and it was therefore imperative to get it out there first. Bugger the possible consequences, because a scoop is a scoop, right guys?
In an age where newspapers are becoming obsolete and other traditional media are being usurped by Twitter, I guess such considerations are also redundant.
It’s time the crusaders on national security at the Oz were held to account for this disgraceful decision to publish - which could have compromised the whole operation. Can’t the editor-in-chief be charged with compromising national security under the Howard-era laws? Surely there is a very strong prima facie case. Go in hard, Simon Overland and colleagues at the Federal Police. The Oz and other outlets need to be taught a lesson about the fact that public security outweighs their precious “right” to a scoop …