<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rudd should sink his teeth into reducing sugar consumption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/29/rudd-should-sink-his-teeth-into-reducing-sugar-consumption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/29/rudd-should-sink-his-teeth-into-reducing-sugar-consumption/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:51:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mac</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/29/rudd-should-sink-his-teeth-into-reducing-sugar-consumption/#comment-35788</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/29/rudd-should-sink-his-teeth-into-reducing-sugar-consumption/#comment-35788</guid>
		<description>Sure, sugar consumption is far out ahead of everything else as the number 1 cause of tooth decay, and increasing access to dentistry, necessary though it might be, is no kind of prevention.

There is something else that is NO kind of prevention, but it is touted as just that, with huge dollars thrown at it in every state: WATER FLUORIDATION.

We keep hearing that there is a dental health crisis across this country. We must do something, tooth decay rates are climbing the experts say. But why is nobody speaking about the gigantic elephant in the room - just about all of Australia now has artificially fluoridated water supplies, and yet tooth decay is climbing. In other words FLUORIDATION is failing.

We should have known it was a failure anyway for a long time, because the stats show that Brisbane, never fluoridated through the 60s, 70s, 80s or 90s (till end of last year) has experienced exactly the same decline in tooth decay rates over those decades as the other cities that introduced fluoride. The decay rate just steadily declined, as in the fluoridated cities, and fluoridation altered the declining rate not one iota. Ditto for all of those countries across Europe that consider fluoridation a human rights violation: Sweden, Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Denmark, Norway and others - their tooth decay rates are doing just fine thank you very much, without any fluoride in the water.

None of this might matter too much if the fluoride chemicals were benign and nobody suffered side-effects. Nothing could be further from the truth. There is a large trade off for the imagine dental health benefit. Two to three percent of people get nasty sensitivity reactions (almost like an allergy) to fluoride in their water. They have to employ very expensive fluoride avoidance measures. And then came the bombshell, the USA National Research Council report on fluoride in water (2006). It spent three years reviewing all of the scientific evidence and produced a 500 page report. Daily amounts of fluoride that you can get from daily use of fluoridated water causes ( for some, even for many people) thyroid gland impairment, brittle bones, nervous system effects for infants and children, certainly tooth discolouration and brittleness, and a range of toxic effects in anyone with kidney disease that prevents them from excreting the chemical properly.

Time to join Europe and quit the practice, since it is failing in its allotted task anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, sugar consumption is far out ahead of everything else as the number 1 cause of tooth decay, and increasing access to dentistry, necessary though it might be, is no kind of prevention.</p>
<p>There is something else that is NO kind of prevention, but it is touted as just that, with huge dollars thrown at it in every state: WATER FLUORIDATION.</p>
<p>We keep hearing that there is a dental health crisis across this country. We must do something, tooth decay rates are climbing the experts say. But why is nobody speaking about the gigantic elephant in the room - just about all of Australia now has artificially fluoridated water supplies, and yet tooth decay is climbing. In other words FLUORIDATION is failing.</p>
<p>We should have known it was a failure anyway for a long time, because the stats show that Brisbane, never fluoridated through the 60s, 70s, 80s or 90s (till end of last year) has experienced exactly the same decline in tooth decay rates over those decades as the other cities that introduced fluoride. The decay rate just steadily declined, as in the fluoridated cities, and fluoridation altered the declining rate not one iota. Ditto for all of those countries across Europe that consider fluoridation a human rights violation: Sweden, Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Denmark, Norway and others - their tooth decay rates are doing just fine thank you very much, without any fluoride in the water.</p>
<p>None of this might matter too much if the fluoride chemicals were benign and nobody suffered side-effects. Nothing could be further from the truth. There is a large trade off for the imagine dental health benefit. Two to three percent of people get nasty sensitivity reactions (almost like an allergy) to fluoride in their water. They have to employ very expensive fluoride avoidance measures. And then came the bombshell, the USA National Research Council report on fluoride in water (2006). It spent three years reviewing all of the scientific evidence and produced a 500 page report. Daily amounts of fluoride that you can get from daily use of fluoridated water causes ( for some, even for many people) thyroid gland impairment, brittle bones, nervous system effects for infants and children, certainly tooth discolouration and brittleness, and a range of toxic effects in anyone with kidney disease that prevents them from excreting the chemical properly.</p>
<p>Time to join Europe and quit the practice, since it is failing in its allotted task anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AR</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/29/rudd-should-sink-his-teeth-into-reducing-sugar-consumption/#comment-33010</link>
		<dc:creator>AR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 11:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/29/rudd-should-sink-his-teeth-into-reducing-sugar-consumption/#comment-33010</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not as if BigSugar growers can plead &quot;we&#039;ll all be rooned..&quot; as it would be THE ideal feedstock for ethanol, producing far more per acre than grain starch. BigSugar SELLERS however, well, that&#039;s a different bag of donations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not as if BigSugar growers can plead &#8220;we&#8217;ll all be rooned..&#8221; as it would be THE ideal feedstock for ethanol, producing far more per acre than grain starch. BigSugar SELLERS however, well, that&#8217;s a different bag of donations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gillespie</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/29/rudd-should-sink-his-teeth-into-reducing-sugar-consumption/#comment-32827</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gillespie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/29/rudd-should-sink-his-teeth-into-reducing-sugar-consumption/#comment-32827</guid>
		<description>Bronwyn, in the article I provide a link to a World Health Organisation report which (after an extensive review of the available population studies both before and after fluoride) concludes that the biggest single determinant of tooth decay is the presence of sugar in the diet.

I&#039;m not arguing for or against including dentistry in Medicare.  I am simply pointing out that it is shutting the door after the horse is well and truly in the neighbour&#039;s paddock and suggesting that before the next generation of foals bolt, we consider addressing the cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bronwyn, in the article I provide a link to a World Health Organisation report which (after an extensive review of the available population studies both before and after fluoride) concludes that the biggest single determinant of tooth decay is the presence of sugar in the diet.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not arguing for or against including dentistry in Medicare.  I am simply pointing out that it is shutting the door after the horse is well and truly in the neighbour&#8217;s paddock and suggesting that before the next generation of foals bolt, we consider addressing the cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bronwyn Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/29/rudd-should-sink-his-teeth-into-reducing-sugar-consumption/#comment-32823</link>
		<dc:creator>Bronwyn Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/29/rudd-should-sink-his-teeth-into-reducing-sugar-consumption/#comment-32823</guid>
		<description>The consumption of sugar is not the sole reason that teeth rot, and  if you use sugar in moderation and long as you practice good dental hygiene (at least brush your teeth a couple of times a day and visit a dentist at least once a year (though mine tries to get me to go twice a year NO THANKS)) then you should minimise the decay caused by sugar. 

Acidic foods also cause decay. I was told by my dentist not to have a acidic food or drink (such as citrus juice or fruit) for at least an hour after brushing my teeth as it wears away enamel (which in turn can lead to tooth decay) and was for some reason more likely to do so immediately after brushing.

I personally think it&#039;s about time that dental health is finally up there with mainstream health. A person&#039;s dental health can affect the health of the rest of their body. Inflammation and infection in your mouth equals inflammation and infection throughout your blood system. The lack of public dentists means that if you have a low income and no health insurance you most likely cannot afford to go to the dentist unless it is one of the handful of public dentists at major public hospitals. 
In dental health this country definitely has a two tiered system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The consumption of sugar is not the sole reason that teeth rot, and  if you use sugar in moderation and long as you practice good dental hygiene (at least brush your teeth a couple of times a day and visit a dentist at least once a year (though mine tries to get me to go twice a year NO THANKS)) then you should minimise the decay caused by sugar. </p>
<p>Acidic foods also cause decay. I was told by my dentist not to have a acidic food or drink (such as citrus juice or fruit) for at least an hour after brushing my teeth as it wears away enamel (which in turn can lead to tooth decay) and was for some reason more likely to do so immediately after brushing.</p>
<p>I personally think it&#8217;s about time that dental health is finally up there with mainstream health. A person&#8217;s dental health can affect the health of the rest of their body. Inflammation and infection in your mouth equals inflammation and infection throughout your blood system. The lack of public dentists means that if you have a low income and no health insurance you most likely cannot afford to go to the dentist unless it is one of the handful of public dentists at major public hospitals.<br />
In dental health this country definitely has a two tiered system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Georgina Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/29/rudd-should-sink-his-teeth-into-reducing-sugar-consumption/#comment-32646</link>
		<dc:creator>Georgina Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 05:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/29/rudd-should-sink-his-teeth-into-reducing-sugar-consumption/#comment-32646</guid>
		<description>This is one heck of an eye opening article. I actually didn&#039;t know about 90% of what it contained; I&#039;m not going to look at my morning cuppa the same way again, that&#039;s for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one heck of an eye opening article. I actually didn&#8217;t know about 90% of what it contained; I&#8217;m not going to look at my morning cuppa the same way again, that&#8217;s for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 561/571 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 18:51:22 -->
