<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seven dominates with Rafters and The Zoo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/08/last-nights-tv-ratings-49/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/08/last-nights-tv-ratings-49/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:34:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heathdon McGregor</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/08/last-nights-tv-ratings-49/#comment-30730</link>
		<dc:creator>Heathdon McGregor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/08/last-nights-tv-ratings-49/#comment-30730</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr Dyer

I was waiting to see if there was any comment on the four corners from Monday night as I wasn&#039;t sure if I was watching the abc or tt or aca with the questioning and&quot;evidence&quot; supplied. Was the interviewer looking for a headline when asking people the same question &quot;if the ambulance arrived would your loved one be alive?&quot; at least the interviewees had enough maturity to respond with statements that drew no conclusions. I refer to tt and aca because that kind of explanatory/instructive interviewing (not aimed at getting information but in forming/dictating conclusions) is more at home there.

maybe I was having a bad night but it was reminiscent of the Andrew Johns program. Get a headline grabbing story, investigate enough to get the grabs and presto. I thought that four corners would try to protect its reputation more than that but I have not watched for a while. 

Is this the norm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr Dyer</p>
<p>I was waiting to see if there was any comment on the four corners from Monday night as I wasn&#8217;t sure if I was watching the abc or tt or aca with the questioning and&#8221;evidence&#8221; supplied. Was the interviewer looking for a headline when asking people the same question &#8220;if the ambulance arrived would your loved one be alive?&#8221; at least the interviewees had enough maturity to respond with statements that drew no conclusions. I refer to tt and aca because that kind of explanatory/instructive interviewing (not aimed at getting information but in forming/dictating conclusions) is more at home there.</p>
<p>maybe I was having a bad night but it was reminiscent of the Andrew Johns program. Get a headline grabbing story, investigate enough to get the grabs and presto. I thought that four corners would try to protect its reputation more than that but I have not watched for a while. </p>
<p>Is this the norm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 433/442 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 11:05:46 -->
