<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goodbye exclusivity: Gawenda on the Fairfax Canberra merger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/19/goodbye-exclusivity-gawenda-on-the-fairfax-canberra-merger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/19/goodbye-exclusivity-gawenda-on-the-fairfax-canberra-merger/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:51:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Moodie</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/19/goodbye-exclusivity-gawenda-on-the-fairfax-canberra-merger/#comment-29056</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Moodie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/19/goodbye-exclusivity-gawenda-on-the-fairfax-canberra-merger/#comment-29056</guid>
		<description>I understand Melburnians&#039; senstivity at being a branch office of Sydney, Geelong&#039;s sensitivity at being a branch office of Melbourne, Tourquay&#039;s reluctance to be an outpost of Geelong, etc.  

But surely rationalising bureaux is an obvious efficiency that Fairfax should have achieved in the distance past when the Age and the Sydney Morning Herald were first included in the same group.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand Melburnians&#8217; senstivity at being a branch office of Sydney, Geelong&#8217;s sensitivity at being a branch office of Melbourne, Tourquay&#8217;s reluctance to be an outpost of Geelong, etc.  </p>
<p>But surely rationalising bureaux is an obvious efficiency that Fairfax should have achieved in the distance past when the Age and the Sydney Morning Herald were first included in the same group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom McLoughlin</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/19/goodbye-exclusivity-gawenda-on-the-fairfax-canberra-merger/#comment-29041</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom McLoughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/19/goodbye-exclusivity-gawenda-on-the-fairfax-canberra-merger/#comment-29041</guid>
		<description>Any thoughts about whether the Age (Vic paper) breaking the Joel Fitzgibbon (NSW MP)  as minister for Defence imbroglio is more or less likely to happen in the future with a merged bureau, Sydney and Melbourne press?

What about icon Michelle Grattan for The Age - that journo is a class act. Sydney has got nothing on her demonstrated daily on ABC Radio National pre 7.45 am.

But what I really think is that Big Press journos and their executives are all overpaid, especially the latter. Or I am woefully underpaid. Or the truth is somewhere in the middle perhaps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any thoughts about whether the Age (Vic paper) breaking the Joel Fitzgibbon (NSW MP)  as minister for Defence imbroglio is more or less likely to happen in the future with a merged bureau, Sydney and Melbourne press?</p>
<p>What about icon Michelle Grattan for The Age - that journo is a class act. Sydney has got nothing on her demonstrated daily on ABC Radio National pre 7.45 am.</p>
<p>But what I really think is that Big Press journos and their executives are all overpaid, especially the latter. Or I am woefully underpaid. Or the truth is somewhere in the middle perhaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 465/475 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 18:56:23 -->
