Say what you like about The Chaser, they’re no Sam Newman

After writing a piece comparing what outrage would have occurred had Sam Newman made the same gaffe on The Footy Show that AFL commentator Ken Judge made on 6PR, this column ended by suggesting that the hypocrisy Geiger-counter was starting to make a funny noise after The Chaser team’s Governor General mannequin sketch in their first show back.

Well a week and a bit later, The Age and Sunday Age couldn’t have taken a more breathtakingly hypocritical stance towards The Chaser and their poor “Make a realistic wish” sketch if they had strategically tried.

The Sunday Age’s editorial (June 7) said in closing:

There is nothing funny about children dying in real life, but black comedy often is offensive, sometimes deliberately hurtful. Without it, we wouldn’t have South Park, Little Britain, even Summer Heights High. At the risk of outraging just about everybody, we hope The Chaser returns, outrageously.

Earlier in the paper they had an in-depth piece on the issue that took a similar apologetic stance, “Is it wrong to laugh at dying kids? Three comedians say sick jokes have their place.”

Pass the bucket while we remind ourselves the closing line from the sketch “why go to any trouble when they are only going to die anyway,” and compare it to the newspaper’s stance towards 2008’s most controversial piece of television, Sam Newman’s  — also poor  — Caroline Wilson/mannequin piece.

We had “Sam Newman’s stupid antics get official rebuke”, there was “Nine deaf to women over the Footy Show”, a tub-thumping editorial “TV show segment demeans women”, written by Samantha Lane with no disclosure that she is a panel member of the only other live AFL based comedy show Before The Game and thus had a strategic commercial advantage in seeing a rival TV show being weakened.

Lane also followed up with “Club Director Alberti Sues Nine Network”, again with no disclosure, there was also “Footy Show watches as ratings slip”, “Sam sorry for sexist stunt” and of course we had the obligatory “vote now” button with the hardly neutral “Are you tuning out?” yes/no button.

Now to state the obvious, the Wilson piece didn’t work, (having spent nine years with the show - 1996-2004 - with the majority of time as Sam’s producer, I probably cumulatively came up with more ideas and sketches that didn’t work than anyone else in the show’s history, so that’s on the table,) but compare the two and decide for yourself which is worse.

Then factor in:

  • The Chaser sketch was not live, so it involved the team writing, debating, filming, editing and reviewing it. The Footy Show piece was live air and clearly only small elements of the cast knew about it.
  • The now infamous Footy Show episode was Newman’s second show back after recovering from a prostate cancer operation. A 63 year old should be sharp as a tack in that situation shouldn’t he? While in Lane’s above mentioned pious piece, she attacked host Garry Lyon for “allowing it to continue”. At that stage Lyon was not only happy that his co-host was back on the show, he was delighted that he was still alive.

No, attacking Newman and The Footy Show has now become more clichéd than critics accuse the show’s humour of being. The latest bandwagon jumper is Sam Stynes, the wife of the Melbourne Demon’s president Jim, who was given the opportunity to provide the address at the official luncheon yesterday due to it being “Women’s round”, and totally fluffed it by using the stage to pull out a mannequin of the Footy Show star and attack him over a 15 month old sketch that he had publicly apologized for.

Meanwhile The Chaser has two weeks off to get some new material in the can and regroup. Make no mistake, the ABC’s decision was pure business, rather morally based given the cash cow that their DVD and merchandise sales are for them.

They’ll ditch the unfunny taped pieces from overseas, go back to their local stock in trade material, and in all probability it will be cack-funny like most of their stuff used to be.

And when they return, they can be assured of a very sympathetic run from one particular section of the media, who have decided that while a ill-judged live sketch towards one of their staff members is worthy of a public outrage campaign, a taped piece lampooning terminally ill children and the organisation that tries to help them and their families cope, is black comedy and should be treated sympathetically.

Racetrack” Ralphy Horowitz is a former producer at The Footy Show, Sunday Footy Show, SEN & 3AW.


7 Comments

  1. Glenn
    Posted Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 2:17 pm | Permalink

    Have to agree, what Sam Newman did was nothing compared to this, well what he did was almost nothing anyway to be frank.

    Chasers must have done this deliberately as surely they aren’t stupid enough to let something this obviously wrong go to air, for goodness sake you wouldn’t say “they’re going to die anyway” even in a private conversation.

    The reason for the hypocrisy in the media ? they don’t like Sam but they do like the Chasers team.

  2. Orin Thomas
    Posted Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 7:29 pm | Permalink

    Starting to get tired of all these “lets justify what Sam Newman Did On The Footy Show” from Horowitz. Is Crikey going to continue publish stories from Horowitz about how the Footy Show is being victimized?

  3. Glenn
    Posted Tuesday, 9 June 2009 at 7:38 pm | Permalink

    Meant to say -

    Chasers must have done this deliberately as surely they aren’t stupid enough to let something this obviously wrong go to air WITHOUT REALISING IT , for goodness sake you wouldn’t say “they’re going to die anyway” even in a private conversation.

  4. Heathdon McGregor
    Posted Wednesday, 10 June 2009 at 1:22 pm | Permalink

    yet another one you lasted one article without the sam good caro bad crud

    Sam is a good bloke really

    All these women writing on football should get back to their sinks eh Ralphy

    Caro, Sam Lane any other writers you dont like or just the female ones?

  5. Ralph Horowitz
    Posted Friday, 12 June 2009 at 8:40 am | Permalink

    Heathdon,
    Pull up will you!
    When have I bagged Caro? Worked with her for a couple of years - whether that is relevant or not is up to others - and working with her close hand confirmed that she is as good as any.
    Nor have I stuck up for THAT sketch on The Footy Show - I pointed out the difference in the media reaction and in this case The Age’s double standards.
    BTW Emma Quayle is a ripping writer and never miss her work.
    Ralph Horowitz

  6. Glenn
    Posted Friday, 12 June 2009 at 9:32 am | Permalink

    I like the game but the people in it are low grade, in the main, with the exception of the likes of James Hird.
    Saw the footy show once with Mel Brookes on it as a guest, every joke he told was met with silence by the crowd and the presenters. Straight over their heads it was embarrassing but shows the mentality of those closest to the game.

  7. Heathdon McGregor
    Posted Friday, 12 June 2009 at 9:46 am | Permalink

    Ralph

    I will pull up when you stop defending your work on the footy show with every article. Gee Sam Lane had a conflict of interest. Isn’t that the afl way since at least when the ceo(owner?manager?) of a catering company oversaw the transfer of the club he was president of moving from a ground where he didn’t have a contract to a ground he did and probably many times before that.

    Perhaps you could do an article on that, great conflicts of interest in the afl. I’m wondering how you could fit yet another defence of Sam into that article.

    The beauty of the internet is you can choose to ignore comments but as long as they aren’t mean or spiteful or illegal then the opinion makers dont have the power to delete them or cut you off like in radio without looking stupid.

    If you want to manage comment go back to radio where there the puff interview is king.